Littleprince

Don't be silly. The key concept was "as long as it doesn't harm anybody else". You count 殺人放火 doesn't harm anybody else? Cool.
Ultraman 發表於 2009-12-11 12:36

嫖妓又怎可以算為 "as long as it doesn't harm anybody else“呢﹖ 起碼傷害了他的另一半了﹐假設他有的話。。。再者﹐好多人嫖妓唔當個女人係人﹐只係工具﹐報紙成日都有講﹐甘咪傷害埋個妓女囉。

chunsh

再者﹐好多人嫖妓唔當個女人係人﹐只係工具﹐報紙成日都有講﹐甘咪傷害埋個妓女囉。
Littleprince 發表於 2009-12-11 13:11

傷害?
physically or mentally?
if u talked about physical abused, thats why we need laws to protect them

and how come u guys just can't face the truth?
legal or not, 嫖 cannot be stopped. Making it illegal just means no laws to protect those people

Ultraman

48# Ultraman


Yeah...guy may have genes for "call chicken" or cheating no matter what, but if things are illegal, they will "think twice" if they wanna do it, since there are bigger consequences (e ...
fibbi 發表於 2009-12-11 12:07

You missed out another fact (which most gals don't realize). Most guys like to enjoy the feel of "stealing". That means, they might enjoy calling chicken more when it's illegal; but once it's legal, they might feel less interest to do so.

news

oh was I?
Littleprince 發表於 2009-12-11 11:46

put aside those that are forced to be prostitutes..it will be another issue..but for your argument...they can choose to provide or not to provide and receive or not to receive sex service...you can choose to murder or not to murder too but you can't choose to be murdered or not be murdered

if you think they are the same...you have a serious problem

Ultraman

嫖妓又怎可以算為 "as long as it doesn't harm anybody else“呢﹖ 起碼傷害了他的另一半了﹐假設他有的話。。。再者﹐好多人嫖妓唔當個女人係人﹐只係工具﹐報紙成日都有講﹐甘咪傷害埋個妓女囉。 ...
Littleprince 發表於 2009-12-11 12:11

Let's stick with single men but not married men. Then single men have no other half to hurt.
Second, if those men just pay and do the trade in a normal way, which involve no mental illness or violence kind of thing, the chickens are getting paid for what they ask for, considered a fair trade. Still no hurt.

Ultraman

再者﹐好多人嫖妓唔當個女人係人﹐只係工具﹐報紙成日都有講﹐甘咪傷害埋個妓女囉。 ...
Littleprince 發表於 2009-12-11 12:11

If you want to talk about extreme or rare case. How about those church pastors sexual assault church fellows? Can I say going to church and believing in God is very dangerous so people rather not to do so at all?

fibbi

53# Ultraman


haha if guys enjoy the feeling of stealing, then let's bring it bigger consequences. prison for 20 yrs and 打藤, how about that?  

shutterbug

Even if it's legalized, the protection is still very limited, so what's the benefit?  the money to enforce will be high just like the safe injection sites.  Who will be paying for it?  We always emphasize the user pays right?  Even if ther users agree to pay, I don't think the users only can cover the cost.  So at the end the other taxpayers have to fund it or the price for using prostitute goes double or triple.  Then we'll be back to square one where prostitudes will opt out of this program and do it under the table again.

Moreover, prostitution is tied to many other crimes, if prostitution is easily available it will open doors for these crimes.

Littleprince

put aside those that are forced to be prostitutes..it will be another issue..but for your argument...they can choose to provide or not to provide and receive or not to receive sex service...you can  ...
news 發表於 2009-12-11 13:20

oh did you missed this sentence? "但係當你無限上崗"
I don't mean to compare anything so your argument 並不成立﹐所以你話咩 COMPARE APPLE TO ORANGE 我先覺得奇怪﹐我有COMPARE 過咩野嗎﹖

Littleprince

If you want to talk about extreme or rare case. How about those church pastors sexual assault church fellows? Can I say going to church and believing in God is very dangerous so people rather not to  ...
Ultraman 發表於 2009-12-11 13:25

甘你即係話嫖妓無傷害任何人﹖