zoids

Soli was right, this election showed the full hand of the hk democratic party, 17%.

HK will never get real fair election ever.  The card is out, and it's not even a face card.

Sad but true.  HK is already dead.

ricrick

在特狗政府、民主黨、建制派及主流傳媒打壓的嚴峻考驗下，都有57萬9千人投票，平均有十萬票不能少看
經過今次選舉，帶起了一班年輕人對政治的興趣，帶出政府及建制派的無恥，遲下D牛鬼蛇神一定要還

Lik

What is the value of democratic political system? Shouldn’t the 立法委員represent people in the government? Shouldn’t they do their job according to the will of the people they represent instead for their own political agenda?
rockypath 發表於 2010-5-16 11:30

Funny how you dare to mention "the value of a democratic political system". Given all the oppression and dirty tactics that the Establishment and the HK SAR PK government has used, how is the system even democratic?!

With a complete lack of mainstream media reporting and fair promotion from the HK SAR PK government, the 580k voters turnout is extremely robust.

-Lik

rockypath

Funny how you dare to mention "the value of a democratic political system". Given all the oppressio ...
Lik 發表於 2010-5-16 12:00

Just answer my question direct and straight. Why didn't the 立法委員 do according to the will of Hong Kong people?  65% of people opposed what they do and they just ignore the will of Hong Kong people.

ricrick

在泛民不合作、中共打壓、政府扭曲及主流傳媒不報導的情況下，很多市民跟本得不到應要的知訊
如果你不感興趣都都不會深究問題所在
說真，要廢除功能及落實雙普選，不知要等到何時

Lik

And why don't you answer my question direct and straight for a change? Given all the oppression and dirty tactics that the Establishment and the HK SAR PK government has used in both the de facto referendum and in LegCo, how is the system even democratic?! How is the existence of functional constituency democratic at all?!

Elected council members represent the will of the people. Even according to the so called 65% who are "against" the de facto referendum and new wave democracy movement, that still means a whopping 35% are for it. And I'll bet you anything that the way the stats are collected is biased/skewed towards steering people to produce that 65% result.

And if you want to argue based on numbers and percentages, an overwhelming majority (some 70 or 80%, IIRC?) are for a generally elected HKSAR CEO in 2012, and failing that, no later than 2017. Why does the HK SAR government not comply with the will of the people?!

STFU la, BS rockypath!

-Lik

martintin

進步是需要時間
新血是需要磨練
民主是需要爭取

佢地犧牲咁多為民主 為自由  卻有人反對
"65%人反對花公帑補選" .呢句標題對我呢講只證明2點
1.香港報紙quality差 常誤導人
2.香港人始終眼裡都只有錢 因為佢地先睇1.5億之後先睇(or無睇)補選的意義

我記得早幾個月前係香港  係街邊見到陳淑莊幾次  不停宣傳公投 、民主 (並唔係拉票活動)
就知道好多香港人唔明佢地做緊乜

公投、 普選如果無人爭取難道真係坐係度乜都唔做等中央政府安排呀
真係唔明
用1.5億去爭取民主  為民主放種子就浪費
真白癡

sheep

What is the value of democratic political system? Shouldn’t the 立法委員represent people in the g ...
rockypath 發表於 2010-5-16 11:30

全世界讀統計學嘅都知
所有問卷調查嘅問題
都係為所需要嘅答案而設計的

如果有人問 你應唔應該花超過一億去做補選
應該要有九成以上話唔應該
而無人會問你
會唔會為增加市民嘅認知來爭取民主而花過億去補選？

Catpiano

Um ..   most of my friends .. (70 after) did vote ..   

Well ..

Lik

Kudos to your friends who went out to vote.

-Lik