返回列表 發帖
回復 90# MoiRhapsody

I don't mind if I'm "renting" the taxi for a short ride...
It looks quite classic though...

TOP

本帖最後由 peter236 於 2010-10-20 01:55 編輯
ski jump ramp~~~咁就要睇下架A貨Su-33同班機師夠唔夠料子玩ski jump ramp 囉~~
原來係taxi~~~車我唔 ...
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2010-10-20 01:49

You claimed that the Chinese need to use the steam catapult. Now you realized the Varyag uses the ski jump, that means they don't need to use the steam catapult for take off. Do you even know how the Varyag looks like?

TOP

本帖最後由 MoiRhapsody 於 2010-10-20 02:18 編輯

第一,國產航母,呢家都係研究緊,
A貨Su-33到底有幾重,take off length可以有幾短都未敢樂觀,唔做好兩手準備,開發個彈射系統出黎,係咪想有船冇機用???
第二,雖然做唔出黎,不過唔用磁力彈射係咪下一代既航母都想續繼ski jump ramp???
第三,要用Ski Jump Ramp take off載重好大限制,唔可以帶太多武器同油,prove to be inferior.
S Internatsionalom
Vospryanet rod lyudskoy!

TOP

回復  MoiRhapsody

I don't mind if I'm "renting" the taxi for a short ride...
It looks quite c ...
lo_pak 發表於 2010-10-20 01:52



    借都免...我驚會爆炸。

TOP

回復 94# MoiRhapsody

Shouldn't be "that" bad, I think...

TOP

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

TOP

回復 93# MoiRhapsody

As far as I know, the new aircraft carrier design that China is proposing will be carrying a lot of missiles & loadings. It's one of the problems most critics are complaining - "overloading" on a single molded carrier. If there's an explosion it turns out to be a catastrophe...

Anyway, it's still the first time ever China starts with its aircraft carrier design. IMO they shouldn't follow the Russian design if they can. We can't expect too much on the performance other than "for demo" only...

TOP

本帖最後由 lo_pak 於 2010-10-20 06:52 編輯

回復 96# fy789

Can that be achieved relying on disel engine output, I doubt... How long do you have to wait to recharge the batteries array after each takeoff...

TOP

你係咪有強迫症??
日日幻想俾日本仔蝦??
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2010-10-19 14:05

你估比d 日本妹妹仔騎唔辛苦架?!?!

TOP

回復 99# mcjohnjohn
日本妹滅我中華億億萬萬子孫蟲之心不滅!!!





















吔咩嗲~~~~~
S Internatsionalom
Vospryanet rod lyudskoy!

TOP

返回列表