Lik

II agree with you points, except
同時實行聯邦制度來解決各分離省份及地區問題。
which is totally not compatible for China. As there is no province that wants to separate from China.

Federalism is only suitable for illegal European colonies like Canada, Australia and the US.
peter236 發表於 2010-12-1 12:42

唔好意思，我笑咗出來～

實行聯邦制就等於 separate from China? Canada, US, and Austrlia are illegal European colonies?

真係唔讚你係天才都唔得～

-力

CWong

这是对台的50年不变誠諾？

Lik

戇鳩就即係戇鳩。

就算有無阿扁果幾年嘅去中國化政策，新一代響臺灣土生土長嘅臺灣人都唔會認為自己係中國大陸嘅人來㗎啦。就好似響呢度出世嘅華裔小朋友，佢大咗之後唔通仲會話自己係香港人、係中國人、係臺灣人咩？

美加兩地都咁多移民，你又唔見第二、第三代嘅移民會話返自己係乜國乜國人？要話嘅都只係會話自己係咩裔咩裔嘅人。

-力

Lik

我揸車落美國半個種都唔使添啦～又唔見我想做美國人？而且，一個鐘飛去大陸？乜大三通係阿扁執政8年裡面所搞出來嘅事？

話你低能真係無講錯。自己指鹿為馬仲要響度發噏風。

-力

peter236

唔好意思，我笑咗出來～

實行聯邦制就等於 separate from China? Canada, US, and Austrlia are illeg ...
Lik 發表於 2010-12-1 13:09

Canada, Australia and the US are based the looting of the native Indians land. That is why they are illegal entities. The individual European colonies then decided to join the so-called federal system.

For China, it is totally different, as the various provinces are all parts of China. There does not exist the need to have any sort of federalism.

It is only the westerners that advocate federalism for China, since federalism would weaken the Chinese central government, thereby easier for the westerners to split China.

sheep

好似話俾連戰定宋楚俞做國家副主席