返回列表 發帖
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

TOP

本帖最後由 lo_pak 於 2011-6-13 20:23 編輯

回復 21# fy789

Cheap talk with M10 without accuracy...
Show me your math with thermodynamics when you are almost at plasma stage...
Are you talking an asteroid? Or you are just BSing...

By the time China has fixed the accuracy, USS vessels will have equipped with laser weapons...

TOP

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

TOP

本帖最後由 lo_pak 於 2011-6-13 22:54 編輯

回復 23# fy789

If you are talking about M10 shooting at an acute angle, you are there. And you have a reason to laugh in front of Peter...
Sometimes I don't really get why you can make fun of yourself that easy...
Thus far, can you show me the leapfrog laser weapon developed by China?

TOP

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

TOP

回復 25# fy789

M5 is reasonable... M10 is, you know the answer... You don't even know where you are shooting at...

TOP

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

TOP

本帖最後由 lo_pak 於 2011-6-13 23:30 編輯

回復 27# fy789

DF-21D, 吹風... . No records showing it's been tested SUCCESSFULLY...
I just don't know how to mention your naive... Sticking with wiki with your professional live...
Theory is one thing, but reality is different.

TOP

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

TOP

本帖最後由 lo_pak 於 2011-6-13 23:42 編輯

回復 29# fy789

What I consider is the accuracy... In the attack mode, DF-21 is a very useful tool if and only if you can tempt the US to send the carrier into the trap, which is the first island chain of the South China Sea along the Japan, Taiwan and Phillipines... If you are that close, I don't think you can achieve M10 before re-entering the lower atmosphere.

TOP

返回列表