MSN04

原帖由 rockypath 於 2009-1-15 04:30 發表


First, Chritians are ordinary people as well. They are called "Christians" just because of what they believe in. Second, whether someone is truely a Christian or not is not up to him/her to claim or ...

Ordinary? 你好謙囉. 唔係一班自命清高既人咩?  咪玩啦, 你死q左會去天堂, 我呢d平民會去地獄喎.

照你咁講, 咁我就唔明喇, 個教裡面無規矩, 無 standard 架?
最緊要就係信, 做乜都唔關個教既事 (好事就關??)  似黑社會多d喎.

shutterbug

原帖由 一代烈士 於 2009-1-15 05:47 發表
蘇牧師已經完全指出同要求同性伴侶唔應該受家庭暴力條例保護. 變相係無人道之言, 換句話基既就唔應該受法律保護. 咁膠既要求都有. 咁如果係唔係人民都有權要求神經人唔可以受法律保護, 因為神經人受擺佈所指既耶人保 ...

rockypath, don't waste your time explaining to someone who is just ignoring what you said and keep yelling at and falsely accusing people.

chunsh

原帖由 shutterbug 於 2009-1-15 11:48 發表

rockypath, don't waste your time explaining to someone who is just ignoring what you said and keep yelling at and falsely accusing people.

tell me, in the video, who is attacking who?
who treat other group of people lower than who?
this is what I call "religious rape"

u just....helpless

rockypath

原帖由 一代烈士 於 2009-1-15 05:47 發表
蘇牧師已經完全指出同要求同性伴侶唔應該受家庭暴力條例保護. 變相係無人道之言, 換句話基既就唔應該受法律保護. 咁膠既要求都有. 咁如果係唔係人民都有權要求神經人唔可以受法律保護, 因為神經人受擺佈所指既耶人保 ...

One of my interests is studying different religions. I did not try to defend Christianity. What I pointed out is what the Bible says from a position of the third person. (I don't have a deep knowledge about Bible and always ask for other people to correct me).

However, I don't think I should spend time to discuss the topic with people like you (一袋狗屎） who are closed minded, lack of knowledge and analytical capability.

rockypath

原帖由 chunsh 於 2009-1-15 11:52 發表


tell me, in the video, who is attacking who?
who treat other group of people lower than who?
this is what I call "religious rape"

u just....helpless

I do not try to defend the pastor here.  

This is not the first time that crazy teachings happened in some Churchese. Remember the 双氧水事件 ten years ago? However, can we make a conclusion that is the teaching of the Bible? If we do, we are just blind minded because we do not have the ability to find out the truth ourselves. We make conclusion just becase we heard someone else said so and so.

[ 本帖最後由 rockypath 於 2009-1-15 12:23 編輯 ]

daimo

....
if this thread keeps growing then 大C姐's post won't reach No.1.

rockypath

原帖由 MSN04 於 2009-1-15 11:15 發表


Ordinary? 你好謙囉. 唔係一班自命清高既人咩?  咪玩啦, 你死q左會去天堂, 我呢d平民會去地獄喎.

照你咁講, 咁我就唔明喇, 個教裡面無規矩, 無 standard 架?
最緊要就係信, 做乜都唔關個教既事 (好事就關??)  似 ...

Every religion has its own teaching and standard. You can criticize Christianity more than other religions maybe it is because Christianity has more exposure than the others in your life experiences.

The concept of “hell” and “heaven” also exist in other religions. Will you attach them as well?

rockypath

原帖由 shutterbug 於 2009-1-15 11:48 發表

rockypath, don't waste your time explaining to someone who is just ignoring what you said and keep yelling at and falsely accusing people.

I think I should save some air now. I didn't get involved in previous discussions. But some people keep attacking and showing that they seem to know much about Christianity while they are actually knowing nothing about it make me feel I should say something. However, I think I would let them enjoy entertaining themselves.

[ 本帖最後由 rockypath 於 2009-1-15 12:51 編輯 ]

chunsh

原帖由 rockypath 於 2009-1-15 12:49 發表


I think I should save some air now. I didn't get involved in previous discussions. But some people keep attacking and showing that they seem to know much about Christianity while they are actually k ...

it is very funny that you guys keep saying other people attacking christianity while you guys' teachings said that other religions are faked and evil

shutterbug

原帖由 chunsh 於 2009-1-15 13:05 發表


it is very funny that you guys keep saying other people attacking christianity while you guys' teachings said that other religions are faked and evil

It's REALLY funny...have you seen us open a thread attacking other's religion?  Think what you did before you say something to insult yourself.