返回列表 發帖
原帖由 Austin 於 2009-1-21 12:00 發表


hahaha, you just showed me how little you know about law


烈士兄話你冇資格就冇資格啦, 你仲唔收聲? 真係好打有限...

TOP

原帖由 mcjohnjohn 於 2009-1-20 21:02 發表


烈士兄話你冇資格就冇資格啦, 你仲唔收聲? 真係好打有限...


haha, you're right.  

TOP

原帖由 samsung 於 2009-1-20 20:59 發表

oh really? so nobody can sue you now?

你咪試下lor 傻西

TOP

原帖由 Austin 於 2009-1-20 21:00 發表


hahaha, you just showed me how little you know about law


小朋友, 你識唔識咩係Charter Right呀, 讀完晒, 理解晒先黎同我嘈我可以講咩啦, 慒能

TOP

原帖由 一代烈士 於 2009-1-20 21:49 發表


小朋友, 你識唔識咩係Charter Right呀, 讀完晒, 理解晒先黎同我嘈我可以講咩啦, 慒能


thats why I suggest u to save your effort, she just fire on us for the sake of fire on us

TOP

當然理Q佢啦
呢D人就算上網都怕用自己account去攻擊人
咁既廢人, 理都徙氣啦
話出黎同我book個擂台打獲金既話就同佢出黎玩

阿叔做差事個時佢仲係到啜緊老母linlin啦

[ 本帖最後由 一代烈士 於 2009-1-20 21:59 編輯 ]

TOP

原帖由 Austin 於 2009-1-20 13:03 發表



Childish because you are not willing to answer a question unless someone answer yours first.  But forget about that.  

There is no right or wrong answer to your question.  To answer it again but in a different I felt that the pastor has the right to lobby (so the basic answer is yes), but his direction is against what I believe in, so I wouldn't support what he's doing.  I might even protest against him.

How about yourself? You only answered my question with your POV. Are you ignoring the fact that Lancer wants to execute believers? Just answer directly, Yes or No.

I somehow agree with you, except I don't think the pastor has the right to lobby wrong (偏激) concept.

Was my POV not clear enough? OK, what I mean is, I personally don't think to kill someone is right (unless in some conditions such as the one I mentioned). In other words, I think it is not right if Lancer is actually going to kill someone. However, he's just saying without action (yet), that's not a problem (he may need to bear the risk I mentioned too).

BTW, you think it is childish because I am not willing to answer a question unless someone answer mine first. (well, actually it's like any usual manner, I asked a question first and you asked after, shouldn't you answer mine first and I answer you next?)
But I think it is stupid and not following the regular game rule the other way round.

TOP

原帖由 Austin 於 2009-1-21 12:05 發表


haha, you're right.  


你明白就好啦~
同佢地硬碰係輸梗架~
同佢地軟碰都係輸梗架~
反正軟硬都輸, 由得佢自己o係度殺乜殺物, 膠乜膠物law.
都幾得意丫~

TOP

原帖由 chunsh 於 2009-1-20 21:54 發表


thats why I suggest u to save your effort, she just fire on us for the sake of fire on us


Haha, you and Lancer are so funny.  So tell me then, what part of the charter of rights are they "breaking"?  Freedom of speech? Freedom of thoughts?  Freedom of expression? Freedom of peaceful assembly? what?

TOP

原帖由 Ultraman 於 2009-1-20 23:32 發表

I somehow agree with you, except I don't think the pastor has the right to lobby wrong (偏激) concept.

Was my POV not clear enough? OK, what I mean is, I personally don't think to kill someone is r ...


Correction me if I'm wrong, in other words, you're saying it's not okay to physically harm a specific group of people, but it's okay to spread hatred against them.

Btw, I asked a question first and you interrupted with yours.

[ 本帖最後由 Austin 於 2009-1-21 04:20 編輯 ]

TOP

返回列表