Back to the olden days (without internet yet), if 俾你見到D好笑既野, you may tell your husband when you get home; but would you phone all your uncles and aunties, schoolmates and friends and colleagues... etc one by one about that funny thing?
All because nowadays technology has been improving and developing a lot, almost everyone has a camera/camera-cell-phone and knows how to use internet, so people doing this kinda "mo liu" things just messing up the correct moral standard in the whole society. Really doesn't mean "the majority is doing this means right".
Well, although the obnoxious housewife was wrong and she embarrased herself at public, it WAS the Cathy employee who shot the video clips.... that clearly violated the privacy of clients.....
Cathy would not be at fault if the video clip was shot by a bypassing pedestrian.
You didn't get it.
The lady could have received compensation from Cathy because the Cathy staff taped the video (which shouldn't have), not because of her 縲地發爛渣 or missed the plane.
Next time, ...
What did the lady harm the public? The most, we can say she was being annoying in a public area. Sharing the video on the internet is just for personal fun (or make fun to other people).
The video clip of cops using taser is a different story. Since a man has been killed by that, the public wants to know what had happened, and thus that video could be a valid and important evidence to the case. Which also prevents those cops wanted to cheat and lie. That's truly related to public concern. You don't see the difference?
原帖由 zoids 於 2009-3-5 17:59 發表
Well, although the obnoxious housewife was wrong and she embarrased herself at public, it WAS the Cathy employee who shot the video clips.... that clearly violated the privacy of clients.....
You probably forgot what you said, or you just want to avoid admitting your mistake.
You said the lady has compensation all because of her over-reacted action. I corrected you that it's because of Cathy counted as their staff's fault. You didn't wear your glasses or what?
發表於 2009-3-5 17:45
| 
