mcjohnjohn

bowtie 曾都傻傻地，生三個，政府佢養呀？書簿費都死啦~!
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2009-10-7 16:07

Moi 兄, 錢唔係最大concern. 問題係生三個真係冇時間去take care of 佢地架woh.
兩公婆都要返工, 只有放工後先陪到仔女, 得幾粒鐘架乍.
有時weekend 都要開工tim 架~

我頂盡都只會生兩個, 已經係極限了.

matt72178

MJJ,
恭喜晒, 生左仔定女呀?

mcjohnjohn

MJJ,
恭喜晒, 生左仔定女呀?
matt72178 發表於 2009-10-7 17:01

多謝, 多謝! 女黎架~
我麥莊莊生成一副外父相! 哈哈~

peter236

小學要殺校, 主要都係收生不足. 呢d 係貧者愈貧, 富者愈富. 就算搞小班, 人人都想入名校, 唔係被迫都唔去入果d 野雞小學啦. 所以, 小弟覺得殺校冇問題, 唔好既野唔該殺左佢, 好果d 就搞小班啦.
中學師資差? 睇下你 ...
mcjohnjohn 發表於 2009-10-7 00:50

hahaha, we all know Lik always make things up to attack Hong Kong.
Here, there are fewer and fewer students, the municipal governments should be able to save some money, but instead the government debt is still rising, and the new HST will squeeze more money from Lik.

peter236

多謝, 多謝! 女黎架~
我麥莊莊生成一副外父相! 哈哈~
mcjohnjohn 發表於 2009-10-7 02:11

Congratulations to you.

Lik

小學要殺校, 主要都係收生不足. 呢d 係貧者愈貧, 富者愈富. 就算搞小班, 人人都想入名校, 唔係被迫都唔去入果d 野雞小學啦. 所以, 小弟覺得殺校冇問題, 唔好既野唔該殺左佢, 好果d 就搞小班啦.
中學師資差? 睇下你係唔係讀名校law... 就算名校都好, 都唔會expect 一個professor 去教中學卦...
大學資助又不足? 死啦... 小弟當年窮到full grant full loan, 都唔覺得學費好貴. 我覺得學費合理, 因為唔駛錢既野, d 人唔會識得珍惜架
mcjohnjohn 發表於 2009-10-6 23:50

小學收生不足，但其實呢個卻係搞小班教學最好嘅契機。一個老師帶成卅幾四十個靚仔，教屁咩？以前小弟響東區的普通學校讀書，一班廿零卅個，咁樣啲學生先有足夠時間同老師 interact，而老師又可以抽多啲時間來重點幫助啲有需要嘅小朋友架嘛。

小學第一樣要做嘅事係培養小朋友對知識嘅興趣，然後就係鍛鍊語文能力同數學邏輯。港式嘅大班填鴨教育根本就完全係垃圾。一大班卅幾四十個靚仔，日日返學根本就淨係做 drill，咁樣讀書有鬼用咩？

個個都想入名校，入到名校個小朋友就會識飛呀？對小朋友來講，最重要嘅教育其實係來自家長，而唔係學校。啲老竇老母生咗件仔出來就 dum 俾學校教，好似自己咩責任都無。而且，名校滿額就滿額㗎啦？入唔到果啲要跳樓定係要絕學？

中學師資差係不爭嘅事實。教英文嘅老師自己啲英文都唔掂，英中其他科目嘅老師啲英文亦講唔掂，但中中嘅老師自己讀大學果陣其實所有啲學科上嘅專有名詞都係用英文嘅。大佬，我鬼知二惡瑛係乜鬼野咩？

香港做老師成日都要做埋鬼死咁多同教學完全無關嘅無謂野。學生多、工作量高、工作時間極長、滿足感又無，但偏偏人工又唔係特別高。從市場經濟學來睇，一份咁唔掂嘅工又點可以吸引到啲有能力嘅人才去做呢？

大學資助不足，搞到無乜錢做研究。而大學研究資金不足，就吸引唔到有料嘅學者來做 prof。結果教出來嘅只係一班無獨立思考能力嘅技術人員，就正如我地嘅場頭草阿哥一樣。

-力

peter236

小學收生不足，但其實呢個卻係搞小班教學最好嘅契機。一個老師帶成卅幾四十個靚仔，教屁咩？以前小弟響東區的普通學校讀書，一班廿零卅個，咁樣啲學生先有足夠時間同老師 interact，而老師又可以抽多啲時間來重點幫 ...
Lik 發表於 2009-10-7 11:45

電車男 Lik, this thread is about Kao winning the Nobel prize. Please take your stupid anti-Hong Kong crap elsewhere.

Lik

電車男 Lik, this thread is about Kao winning the Nobel prize. Please take your stupid anti-Hong Kong crap elsewhere.
peter236 發表於 2009-10-7 11:33

And why don't you take your blind patriotism elsewhere?

The point of my previous post was, despite Dr. Kao's success, the current HK education system is so messed up that it is highly likely for HK to have another Nobel Prize winner unless significant reforms are made. Bowtie Tsang's congratulatory remarks were nothing more than further insults to Dr. Kao's success because of its inherent hypocrisy.

Of course, in accordance with standard Chinese practices, you only know how to 報喜不報憂.

-Lik

peter236

And why don't you take your blind patriotism elsewhere?

The point of my previous post was, despite Dr. Kao's success, the current HK education system is so messed up that it is highly likely for HK  ...
Lik 發表於 2009-10-7 12:40

電車男 Lik, every time you argued with me, I gave you enough logical reasoning. But you just ignored them and you lost the argument. It is you that is a loyal supporter of the British imperialists. You are just another product of the crappy Canadian education system.

Now, take your stupid anti-Hong Kong crap elsewhere, as this thread is about Kao winning the Nobel prize.

Lik

電車男 Lik, every time you argued with me, I gave you enough logical reasoning. But you just ignored them and you lost the argument.
peter236 發表於 2009-10-7 12:26

On another note:

http://news.mingpao.com/20091008/gba1h.htm

外國科研資金佔GDP 4% 港0.8％

中大副校長楊綱凱說，隨投入科研發展的經濟力量增加，加上政策配合等，獲獎的機會自然較均等。他說，已發展國家每年投放科研的資金，佔國民生產總值約3%至4％不等，中國雖然僅得1.5％，但基數龐大而且集中投放，所以用於科研的金額不少。他指出，國家更計劃增加科研的資源，深圳計劃在未來數年增至7％，可惜香港仍只得0.7％至0.8％，比較「失禮」，台灣、新加坡等亦有2%至3％。他說，若本港投放的比例沒大改善，雖不排除有個別成功例子，但數目不會多。