chunsh

原帖由 Traum 於 2008-2-21 15:59 發表

Oh? Just since when did receiving money from Taiwanese organizations became a crime? I am totally not aware of that!

Using your logic, all Taiwanese-fund work in China would provide enough grounds f ...

did u read SAZABI's comment?
I agree with that
one thing, if China government really can find some solid evidences to prove him do anything harmful to china government, he is a dead meat; so we can say, there is no SOLID evidence; however, one thing we can sure, he MUST have done something very suspicious. Otherwise, u think the chinese government is too bored so they catch someone who they don't like to put into jail? remember, chinese government has been trying to hard to tell hk people that they will not ruin HK since 1997 (and still going on). So I don't tihnk they would put a hk people to jail for no reason.

no one can really prove that he is innocent or guilty (even himself)
you may say prosecuting a peson who can't be proven to be guilty/innocent is wrong, but u shouldnt just blame the communist government, CIA just do the same sh*t all the time

[ 本帖最後由 chunsh 於 2008-2-21 16:30 編輯 ]

chunsh

原帖由 Traum 於 2008-2-21 18:39 發表

Come on, Chunsh. I thought you're smarter than that. How is HK not ruined after the 1997 handover? First the economy turned into a big pile of shxt. And now the political system has turned into an ev ...

the one who ruined hk is Dong's government, not Chinese government
but that is out of topic, I just want to point out that chinese governemnt do whatever they can to make us believe that they will not harass us, the hk people; so they will not put that 程翔 for ABSOLUTELY no reason

peter236

原帖由 Traum 於 2008-2-21 18:39 發表

Come on, Chunsh. I thought you're smarter than that. How is HK not ruined after the 1997 handover? First the economy turned into a big pile of shxt. And now the political system has turned into an ev ...

Traum, you stupidty has disappointed me again. With all your talent, I expected a lot more from you. HK went into economic problems after 1997 because of the Asian financial crisis and the bubble economy that your British masters created before the handover. Now the British themselves have another banking problem involving the nationalization of Northern Rock which is a bank in bankruptcy.  It seems that the British are good at creating financial crap. After all you are just a silly pro-British clown.

chunsh

原帖由 Traum 於 2008-2-22 01:22 發表
The AFC affected the entire Asia-Pacific region, but HK remained dead last in recovering from it because of its steadfast refusal to drop the US exchange rate monetary policy. And guess who was pullin ...

"destroy HK's political and legal system"
destroy?
in what way?
香港人現在在水深火熱之間嗎?
sigh....
有時候我懷疑﹐你是不是受過文化大革命的洗禮呢?
otherwise﹐點解你比美國人更憎chinese government

peter236

原帖由 Traum 於 2008-2-22 01:22 發表
The AFC affected the entire Asia-Pacific region, but HK remained dead last in recovering from it because of its steadfast refusal to drop the US exchange rate monetary policy. And guess who was pullin ...

That's total crap, you little pro-British idiot. Maybe you should take a few more courses like Economics 101 and Finance 101. Many other Asian countries had a much more diversified economy than HK. South Korea had car industry and ship building. Taiwan, South Korea and Singapore had a lot more high-tech industries, electronics, and computer-related industries than HK. Therefore they recovered faster than HK. You should be able to see that your British masters did little to develop HK's economy and to maintain the stability of the economy before 1997, besides a bubble in the stock market.

[ 本帖最後由 peter236 於 2008-2-22 03:12 編輯 ]