satil

回復 88# peter236

你真懂抺黑.

可惜, 我從沒有幫人砌機, 亦沒幫人拉線, 你d料錯咗喎.

懶醒!

MoiRhapsody

Answer my questions, you moron.
Why CT need to pay MIPS tech to use MIPS64 for their Loongson 3?
Does all X86 chips consider as an America design?

blue20ae

I don't who are the "HKers in these forum".  My name is blue20AE (in this forum) and I am a Canadian.

MoiRhapsody

I don't who are the "HKers in these forum".  My name is blue20AE (in this forum) and I am a Canadian ...
blue20ae 發表於 2011-6-21 21:46

    喎系順德人來嘩~

BiscottiGelato

I think they are making it MIPS instruction set compatible. Not so much buying a MIPS core. One'd want to make your chip compatible with a popular instruction set, otherwise you'll have no usable SW on it. The wiki page i pasted far back in Page 2 mentioned that one can compile Linux/Unix etc for Longsoon MIPS quite easily.

As someone stated before, AMD and Intel are both x86 instruction set compatible, but doesn't mean that they 'used' the x86 core, nor AMD used Intel's core, nor AMD used Intel's core.

peter236

I think they are making it MIPS instruction set compatible. Not so much buying a MIPS core. One'd wa ...
BiscottiGelato 發表於 2011-6-22 12:06

Exactly, I used AMD and Intel, as an example of different designs that can run compatible softwares, but those bashers just won't listen.

MoiRhapsody

...... Both intel and AMD are x86 core.......
AMD needs to buy license from intel to product x86-64 .....

MoiRhapsody

五毛分散注意力實在太利害～！
重申論點：
如果AMD同Intel雖然共用X86 ISA但唔可以叫做「同一款」晶片，點解用同一系列既ISA既晶片會俾peter話係american晶片呢？
咁點解Fujitsu塊SPARC 64 VIIIfx會係”rely on SPARC, an American design.“(quote from peter)
同一時間loongson 3又係 base on MIPS 64,但係loongson又唔會係”rely on MIPS, an American design."呢？？