MoiRhapsody

your IPA BASHER IS invaild!!

peter236

Hahaha.............
fy789 發表於 2011-6-22 20:55

These books are beyond their education level. These amateurs should be ignored.

BiscottiGelato

Fujitsu is making processors against SPARC
China dudes is making processors against MIPS

Only difference is SPARC is open source and Fujitsu is on the spec committee. Where-as MIPS is not, and those Chinese guys probably had to pay good $ to get the license to use it. Aside from that I don't really see the difference. I'd say both shall be credited the same.

Whether Fujitsu acquired company/team/people/IP for their initial development against SPARC I have no clue. Tho I'd think you'd often hire more people when you start a project and ideally, you'll hire people with experience. Buying or referencing existing IPs, as long as you have the appropriate right in doing so, is in my opinion not a 'lowly copying' act,

Just as the Chinese dudes. I'm sure they hired people that have experience in MIPS architecture, perhaps previously employed by companies that have developed ASIC with MIPS cores, etc. I wouldn't be surprised they referenced/borrwed from a lot of existing ASIC design, and other IPs, with the appropriate right to use such IPs or not, when they developed their own MIPS based processor.

peter236

Fujitsu is making processors against SPARC
China dudes is making processors against MIPS

Only diffe ...
BiscottiGelato 發表於 2011-6-23 13:52

This is a fair comparison. The Chinese Loongson CPU started as a university research project, where professors and graduate students worked on the design of the Chinese CPU.

But some people here make an excuse to discredit the Chinese researchers, for the purpose of anti-Chinese bashing, that has become so common on this forum.

MoiRhapsody

Then Peter can you explain why you discredit fujitsu Researcher using the same theory ?

satil

Then Peter can you explain why you discredit fujitsu Researcher using the same theory ?
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2011-6-23 20:39

對一個連簡單電腦病毒都分唔清既人, 一個唔係電腦專家, 你要有d耐性. 不過結果都會一樣, 死撐, 或唔直接答你. 甚至人身攻擊你.

peter236

Then Peter can you explain why you discredit fujitsu Researcher using the same theory ?
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2011-6-23 20:39

The reason is that Fujitsu had to buy HAL Computer Systems, an American company that designs the SPARC compatible CPU. This shows Fujitsu has no CPU design capability.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HAL_Computer_Systems

The Chinese Loongson project did not buy another company. They started from scratch and design their own MIPS compatible CPU.

MoiRhapsody

stupid.
CT paid to use MIPS 32 and 64,
This shows CT has no CPU design capability.
no different then Fujitsu.
YOU MORON!

peter236

stupid.
CT paid to use MIPS 32 and 64,
This shows CT has no CPU design capability.
no different the ...
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2011-6-24 04:32

No doubt loongson is Chinese developed, but why the hell you need to use such a stupid excuse to bas ...
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2011-6-21 06:02

You moron, you already admitted previously that the Chinese designed their own CPU. So you should stop contradicting yourself.

Fujitsu had to buy HAL Computer Systems, an American company that designs the SPARC compatible CPU. This shows Fujitsu has no CPU design capability.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HAL_Computer_Systems

The Chinese Loongson project did not buy another company. They started from scratch and desiged their own MIPS compatible CPU.