rockypath

I will bet my money on 唐英年.

rainbow-davie

回復 11# rockypath


    but are you going to bet your life? lol

peter236

I even provided you with a valid, everyday common folks example to support my claim.

When the functional constituency was first created, its members weren't nearly as jin 9 as they are now. In much the same way, when the CCP was first formed, its ideals and intentions were quite good. But look at what they have turned into now.

-Lik
Lik 發表於 2011-9-28 00:39

What they turned into now? They pulled more people out of poverty in a shorter period of time, than any other major country in history.

They are the fastest growing major economy in the world.

rockypath

回復  rockypath


    but are you going to bet your life? lol
rainbow-davie 發表於 2011-9-29 02:01

Are you going to bet your life on anyone? lol

masterbear

What a SHOW!! We all will know the final results will be...... JUST FOOLING AROUND

ricrick

全港7百萬人的命運就係800條友身上，800條友又係聽命上頭或被人買通。選乜能？搞來搞去都係欽點，關市民x事。要思考就是如何買通800係友，叫中央直接委派好過啦，少一大班人cap水

Lik

全港7百萬人的命運就係800條友身上，800條友又係聽命上頭或被人買通。選乜能？搞來搞去都係欽點，關市民x事 ...
ricrick 發表於 2011-9-29 11:29

所以講來講去，其實最終都係要有雙普選。

-力

ricrick

最搞笑出黎選好似做賊甘，鬼鬼祟祟，驚得罪誰誰誰

mcjohnjohn

全港7百萬人的命運就係800條友身上，800條友又係聽命上頭或被人買通。選乜能？搞來搞去都係欽點，關市民x事 ...
ricrick 發表於 2011-9-30 03:29

咁果800條友又未至於聽命上頭或被人買通, 其實大家投票好多時都係為左自身利益架啦! 問題係呢八百人係點樣組成, 同埋點解要係800人而唔係香港所有人. 講真, 如果有人話比我知呢800人係最叻既人同埋全部都係真心為香港好, 我唔介意比d 800人去決定香港既事. 不過我唔覺得law.

我MJJ 幾時都覺得叻既人係比蠢既人少, 可惜民主既社會就係要少數服從多數, 其實係唔係一個矛盾呢?

ricrick

咁果800條友又未至於聽命上頭或被人買通, 其實大家投票好多時都係為左自身利益架啦! 問題係呢八百人係點樣 ...
mcjohnjohn 發表於 2011-9-29 18:17

枉你讀甘多書，讀個蠢人出黎，完全浪費光陰與金錢。
不過我吾怪你，你都係被儒家思想熏陶。
人生來就是不平等的，有強，有弱;有貴,有賤;有智,有愚。弱肉強食是自然界的規律，人類社會做為自然界的一部分自然也是一樣，強者難免會欺負弱者。那麼，強弱之間怎樣才能保持和平相處呢？西方法治國家的做法是建立一套規則既法律以抑制強者，保護弱者；而向以禮儀​​之邦自居的中國則奉行人治既“仁”，為了保持“​​仁”既人與人之間的關係，便有了君君臣臣，父父子子，倫理道德，三綱五常……然而，之前講過，由於自然界的客觀規律以及人的自私本性，這樣試圖以道德自覺維持不同階級的和諧只能是虛假的流於表面的，掩蓋的是統治階級對勞苦大眾的愚弄和奴役。

現今，香港教育水平甘高，行民主絕對有資格有餘。若受欺壓的小數是受到基本保護，少數要服從多數利益當然合理。