See you never listen.
原帖由 Toppy 於 2009-2-17 01:40 發表 
For the first paragraph, my response is:
群眾論據（argumentum ad populum）：論據訴諸感性的弱點，而非事實和原因，旨在煽動群眾的支持。
無知論據（argumentum ad ignorantiam）：誤導性的論據，倚仗於人們的無知。
小眾統計（statistics of small numbers）：類似監視下的選擇。（例如：我的父母吸了一世煙，但他們從未患過癌症。又例如：我不管其他人如何講 Toyota，我的 Toyota 卻從未發生過問題。）只指出少量有利數據，與整體機會並無關係。〔譯註：把 Yugo 改成 Toyota 使更易明白〕
1) Quoting many terms doesn't help to bring your points across and quoting terms don't make you right. Yes, please explain.
原帖由 Toppy
When you say it is biased, which part? The news about a guy was beat up on the street. What's so biased in that? The same with home invasion or car break-in. Are they biased because it doesn't happen to me ever in Vancouver. Because it doesn't happen to me, there is no home invasion or car break-in or gun violence in Vancouver? Do you people see the logic in that? I posted new links to show there are other occurences regardless of whether it happened to me or not.
2) Please don't assume what you know is always the truth. You posts are biased because "you" cherry pick what you want to support you. Re-using your example, you quoted home invasion / car break-in new reports and then trying to "convince" us that there are home invasion / car break-in at every single corner in the city. What's your logic in that?
Nobody ever disagree that racism happened in our life. I never saw anyone LYK said Vancouver has no racism. I believe we all know and experienced racism before, and racism happened in ourselves as well. Please don't repeat your mistake and keep assuming how you know other people think.
原帖由 Toppy
Filtering out the swearings? You filtered out THEIR SWEARINGS but listen to every word about my response to their swearings? Look at what I said earlier. I am beginning to see why some people don't understand the message. Because you seem to think, if something doesn't happen to you, it doesn't happen in real life--home invasion and car break-in, for example. How do I explain to you people that there are indeed home invasion and car break-in property crimes in Vancouver? But since you have never encoutered property crimes in Vancouver and therefore think it doesn't happen? Tell me.
3) Please don't assume. You simply think too much but don't listen. Bubblesalt said we don't need you to "teach" us because we already know what's going on in our life, and it isn't the same as what you want to convince us. Keep repeating doesn't help to make us believe. How do you know we aren't fighting for our right? You assumed again.
原帖由 Toppy
I don't want to assume anything. But reading what I have written so far? What do you think? Just about the home invasion and car break-in.
Let's discuss home invasion and car break-in property crimes. Maybe it is easier for you to understand why people here failed to understand my message.
So are you reading what I have written so far? Do you think you assumed too much? If I post 200 old messages of home invasion / car break-in today, will that make you think home invasion / car break-in is going to happen to you tomorrow immediate? That's what you're doing here, and that's what we don't agree.
原帖由 Toppy
I came to pick a fight? I visited many other places online. Everyone told me the same story--living in Canada stories with colored minorities.
Only here, a place of hong-niggers to hide, people have reacted like that.
I don't want to "copy and paste" to show you where other places are. Because accroding to you, other places don't exist.
So every single one told you their racism stories because of their colored in Vancouver? And nobody tell you a single opposite story except here? If that fourm does exist, please tell us. Please don't copy/paste since you are the baised one. Just give us the site and LYK will go there to post our opposite story to educate people.
[ 本帖最後由 B2L2 於 2009-2-17 02:46 編輯 ] |
發表於 2009-2-17 00:40
| 
