"""首先上面提到個架坦克無碌落個人度﹐即係代表軍人好可能無接到碌人命令﹐此乃疑點一。
當時在場既學生領袖話無見過坦克車碌人﹐ 叫人唔好講大話﹐此乃疑點二。
相片血肉矇糊﹐難以知道是否人類﹐此乃疑點三(馬力論也)。
若是學生/民眾屍體﹐渣坦克既是否蓄意碌落個人度﹐定係意外﹐此乃疑點四。有此四疑點﹐單憑一幅相真係唔代表D乜。"""
馬力論- how do you know when the tank run on a person, the person will become 血肉矇糊﹐
why don't you just simply say it is a photoshop pic. accident = something you don't plan to do. if it didn't plan to do it, it should just hit part of the body, not the whole body.
"""如果軍隊徒手清場﹐我諗軍隊死亡人數一定係數以千計。"""
they can just use empty/air? bullet, which has min. damage. but they choose the use the exploring bullet.
"""而家跟本冇人知邊個係死者"""
it is quite easy to figure out, since china people needs "戶籍" for studying/working/almost everything. so whoever doesn't report his 戶籍 after that, he may be one of them.
for the young generation, they don't have much info/education about 64 therefore they question about it. |
發表於 2009-4-16 18:03
| 
