mcjohnjohn

香港人真係死都唔會申請綜援
呢樣野好
值得讚
快樂牛郎 發表於 2010-3-19 15:54

唔係個個香港人死都唔申請綜援既, 佢只係一個個別例子.
有骨氣唔係唔好, 但骨氣唔可以當飯食, 為左填飽個肚, 放棄少少骨氣都係一個權宜之計吧.

yuusaku

i don't think 申請綜援 = 冇骨氣
it is from the taxpayer's money, if the applicant ever paid any tax, i don't think it is shameful to apply.   unless that guy decides to live his life on EI forever...but i don't think the system allows that anyway.

sheep

咦？
掃把頭
你個乜乜重住僅公屋呀？
琴日佢重去排隊攞綜緩喎！

有時
都要照顧吓身邊嗰啲有頭有面嘅親戚朋友嘅

samsung

咦？
掃把頭
你個乜乜重住僅公屋呀？
琴日佢重去排隊攞綜緩喎！

有時
都要照顧吓身邊嗰啲有頭有面嘅親戚 ...
sheep 發表於 2010-3-19 08:51

what about his grandma? he eats nothing and also tell grandma not to eat anything? to feed his 骨氣﹖starve grandma to die? as the judge said: now you have committed crime, isn't it more 無尊嚴?

I agreed with yuusaku, 唔申請尊嚴 is not equal to 有骨氣﹐有骨氣 should try his every best to find a job, take up the responsibily to feed the family. 所謂大丈夫能屈能伸﹐甚麼工都應該做,even with very humble salary or 出賣努力. And also EI or welfare is a system that we are qualify and eligible to get, esp EI, we have contributed every month from our hard earned money, I will definitely apply if I need to, why not?

samsung

and he used a very stupid way, how many times can he cheat star ferry and thought nobody would notice? and only for that small bit of money? silly silly!!!

sheep

而家變成面子問題

tofu

Yes, there are so many factors that you can't determine at the interview.  That's why I think it's ...
快樂牛郎 發表於 2010-3-18 20:27

we shouldn't reject someone just because he's overqualified, but we prefer the one just fit the job. and there is no guarantee the overqualified person will stay for 6 months or longer.  they may find another job next week.  the training may need a week or so, but it takes time for a newbie become experienced person.   posting a job/interview a person cost time & money too.