rockypath

I like your signature
sheep 發表於 2010-6-3 11:49

I like his signature too.

Unfortunately, you guys just keep on fooling yourselves and that is the reason none of you guys has been able to challenge me. Instead of 自我反省, you guys chose to find a way to comfort yourselves. What an 阿Q. How pity.

samsung

I like your signature
sheep 發表於 2010-6-3 11:49

thank you

they are absolutely 原創 ga

sheep

回復 51# rockypath


   自己諗吓
響呢度 你講過幾多次
"對不起 我錯"

sheep

Unfortunately, you guys just keep on fooling yourselves and that is the reason none of you guys has been able to challenge me. Instead of 自我反省, you guys chose to find a way to comfort yourselves. What an 阿Q. How pity.

rockypath 發表於 2010-6-3 12:24

講完呢番話
係唔係有飄然嘅感覺呢

soli

errrr
我只係想俾個「瘀」字妳...
仲有，我估唔到妳會貼篇咁既文.....
老老實實，好失望，低手。
廢取功能 ...
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2010-6-3 06:44

真係唔係你o甘勤力找資料﹐我諗呢度都無乜人會知同care你所找既數字。
瘀一次半次又有咩所謂。
功能組別的確係可以令立法會做到有均衡參與﹐你睇下2008年個30席民選席位﹐自由黨一席都無﹐如果無功能組別﹐邊個代表商界利益? 如果全部直選﹐議員要買票﹐誇張D講﹐最低工資升到HKD100/hr 都有可能啦。
我就認為功能組別不需廢除﹐係要改革﹐令每個功能組別也有民意代表性﹐亦能真正代表該行業既利益﹐以前肥彭既新九組可以作參考。

sheep

最低工資升到HKD100/hr 都有可能啦。
soli 發表於 2010-6-4 19:47

   你同張廿蚊 一樣下九流