rockypath

回復 20# Guy

First, the military camp was set up, but it does not say it is Chinese military camp with Chinese soldiers 駐紮 in it.

Second, the article does not say it was Chinese soldiers who released the dog to attack civilians.

Third, the local man only said he hates Chinese military since they took away the diamonds but not because the Chinese soldiers released the dog to attack him.

If you analyze the paragraphs you quoted according to English writing style, it actually says it is local military camp and local soldiers.

This is a very common 手法 to put 2 unrelated issues or incidences together to create a 遐想 of their relationship or lead the viewers to a conclusion or impression which the author wants to achieve.