|
 
|
Taxpayers to take $33-million hit as fewer drivers than
Taxpayers to take $33-million hit as fewer drivers than expected use Golden Ears Bridge
Metro Vancouver taxpayers are expected to be on the hook for another $33 million in costs for the Golden Ears Bridge this year, because fewer drivers than expected are using the region’s first tolled crossing.
Revenues from tolls are projected to be about $37.9 million this year, substantially more than the $30 million collected in 2010. However, TransLink’s payments to the bridge builder and operator increase to $71 million in 2011 from $52 million in 2010, and will rise again in 2012.
That adds up to a cumulative shortfall, since 2009, of $63.8 million for a bridge that was supposed to pay itself off in 30 years.
TransLink spokesman Ken Hardie concedes the projected traffic on the Golden Ears Bridge has levelled off, partly because drivers are seeking “free alternatives” such as the Port Mann Bridge, even though they have to go out of their way to access it.
An initial traffic and revenue study completed in 2004 forecast significantly higher traffic and revenues than have materialized.
“We have seen traffic volumes on the bridge plateau,” Hardie said. “We expected them to be higher.”
The reluctance of commuters to pay tolls comes as work continues on the new 10-lane $3.3-billion Port Mann Bridge, scheduled to open in 2013, which will also rely on tolls to help cover costs. Plans to charge tolls on a new Pattullo Bridge, being built by TransLink, are being reconsidered after the provincial government recently recommended a refurbishment of the existing bridge instead of replacement.
Hardie said TransLink plans to launch a marketing campaign to get more people using the Golden Ears Bridge, saying once the Port Mann is tolled, they will probably realize the Golden Ears crossing is a more efficient and convenient crossing.
He wouldn’t say what the marketing plan would entail, but TransLink said last year it was looking at options such as lowering tolls during certain times of the day to get more non-commuters — such as truckers and service providers — using the crossing.
“What we want to do is ensure the bridge is fulfilling its function in the transportation system,” Hardie said, adding “We knew our contribution [to the Golden Ears Bridge] would be front-end loaded and we would be subsidizing while the toll revenue caught up.” |
|