溫哥華老友記討論區 - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: [FACE 週刊]$1,000影結婚相中伏　嬲爆新娘：激到啞咗！ [打印本頁]

作者: khaki 時間: 2010-3-31 12:08 標題: [FACE 週刊]$1,000影結婚相中伏　嬲爆新娘：激到啞咗！

本帖最後由 khaki 於 2010-3-31 12:13 編輯

$1,000影結婚相中伏　嬲爆新娘：激到啞咗！
2010年03月31日

新郎無端端耷咗頭，真係大吉利是，唔怪得新郎都動真火話：「我冇一張相可以曬番畀啲賓客嘅！」
生命冇 take two，結婚當然亦唔想有，但最近有對新人貪平搵咗個 freelance女攝影師影結婚相，點知中晒伏！
呢位所謂攝影師 Iras影相手法另類又飄忽，效果奇差，睇到對新人眼反。結果新娘 friend為免 Iras再遺禍人間，實行喺 fb度開壇搞聲討，再人 post上高登，爸打梗係要做嘢，惡搞之餘更即時召集起底組人肉搜尋 Iras，有網友幫新娘出氣，但新娘就話：「我諗番都想喊呀！」咁又係，唔通大吉利是結多次咩！
喺二月歡喜地出嫁嘅新娘 Cecilia一心諗住婚禮慳錢唔鋪張，於是透過朋友介紹搵咗業餘攝影師 Iras影結婚相，家陣一般影結婚相市價起碼$4,000，但呢位女 photographer卻收$1,000照做，新娘 Cecilia話：「其實我睇過佢之前幫外國人影嗰輯結婚相， ok o架，咁我哋要求唔係特別高，係朋友介紹嘅，所以 offer佢$1,000幫我哋影，佢又冇話平喎，嗰日佢都係影咗兩個半鐘頭。」其實收咁平新娘都預咗輯相唔會靚到曉飛，係估唔到會差到咁！

fb友堅插

新娘 friend喺 fb聲討攝影師 Iras，雖然只係得 3百幾人 add咗，但就喺高登留言過千次，高登友仲話用手機影相靚過佢。

攝影師 Iras影相不單只唔出聲提吓啲賓客望鏡頭，仲要齋影一幅就算，影多張都冇，但 Cecilia話當場都有問過佢， Iras竟然答佢 ok！

射燈啄頭
除咗鬆郁矇，連大大支射燈都攝入鏡頭，又似惡搞又似鬼相，留念又唔係睇又激心，新娘 Cecilia話：「佢又唔肯向我哋道歉，好冇誠意又好唔尊重人。」

爆笑惡搞
高登爸打一向勁有創意，講惡搞確係好爆笑，其中一張 Iras影到對新人側埋一邊嘅相，有咁大嘅發揮空間，爸打梗係唔會嘥嘢，即刻 key圖惡搞，變成又有《富貴門》家燕姐、 8號波扮 MJ嘅無綫記者潘蔚林；仲有高達嚟賀佢哋婚禮，星光熠熠過台慶。

忍唔住喊
Iras幫 Cecilia全程影咗 230張相左右，有一半鬆郁矇外，有啲相構圖仲要超騎呢！之後交相要三催四請之餘，新娘話：「我用咗大半個月先追得番啲相，佢仲好求其咁搵張咭紙包住 CD-Rom寄過嚟，我打開啲相一睇，即時激到啞咗，我情願畢業相影得衰過結婚相，今時今日我諗番都忍唔住喊呀！」
睇完啲相嬲到震，新娘即刻搵 Iras理論，但得到嘅回覆係：「我驚唔好意思，所以冇出聲叫人望鏡頭」、「唔好意思喎，我都唔想 o架！」 Cecilia話：「佢影相嗰陣態度都有問題啦，個婚宴都未完，佢竟然當住成枱賓客問我收錢，搞到我好似冇錢畀咁。之後搵佢又成日長響，留言又唔覆，我覺得佢個態度好唔得囉！」
人哋結婚話晒係人生大事，收得平都應該專業啲，嗰位女 photographer又真係唔啱數喎！

Hea底城大畢業生
女攝影師 Iras被網友起底，原來佢喺城大讀創意媒體，年約 25歲， 07年畢業之後以 freelance形式幫人影相。佢喺 Flicker上嘅作品（左）都鍾意玩 style，而佢幫外國人影嘅結婚相（右）又唔算太差，所以俾網友鬧爆佢一係 hea影、一係嫌價低存心玩嘢。 Iras除咗喺 21號喺 blog上留言回應事件之外，一直都潛水迴避問題，之前應承新娘 Cecilia話會執 40張相補鑊，但就一直冇下文，呢啲態度又要打 300大板。

事後死撐
Iras事後向 Cecilia解釋佢影相鍾意捕捉「 lively moment」，仲暗寸大家嘅審美觀有差距喎！

專業群插
Iras收人 1,000蚊幫人影結婚相搞到一鑊粥，兩名專業人士都分別插佢未夠班，不過新娘貪平搵個業餘友影自己大日子都有責任，錯在雙方囉！

攝影師靳子森：完全唔合格
名設計師靳埭強堂弟、考獲英國皇家攝影學會會士、有 30多年攝影經驗的靳子森話：「佢嘅表現完全唔合格囉，唔應該出嚟接 job，佢學多啲嘢先啦﹗好似三個人企喺海邊嗰張相，佢都影唔啱個水平綫，構圖超級差﹗新郎耷低頭嗰張相，佢應該 delete啦，仲畀個客？作為專業攝影師佢仲有排學，佢嘅審美眼光連揀相都未得囉。」

I Do婚紗攝影謝小姐：唔好貪平
「專業嘅婚禮攝影師不單只要同客人溝通，仲要識氹啲賓客、搞氣氛。呢個女攝影師非常唔入流，佢經驗唔夠又唔 professional，真係懷疑佢未必鍾意影相，可能只係搵飯食。而呢對新人嘅安排絕對草率，鶽家好多新人會使錢搵幾個 photographer嚟影相，千祈唔好貪平呀！」
採訪、撰文：娛樂組

-------
I don't wanna post their original pics here unless I can find the masked ones. You should be able to find a fan page make by the bride under the photographer's name.

作者: khaki 時間: 2010-3-31 12:16

其實點解個新娘要攪大到上face magazine？ＨＫ呢Ｄ事日日有啦。不過$1000兩個鐘響ＨＫ真係算above市價，見到Ｄ相真係又喊又笑咯

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2010-3-31 12:46

hk is full of jokes

作者: chunsh 時間: 2010-3-31 12:50

this event has happened for at least a month already

作者: chobit 時間: 2010-3-31 13:05

You get what you pay for la! I don't feel sorry for the bride at all..! But then.. that photographer sucks....!

作者: Catpiano 時間: 2010-3-31 13:05

Are they talking Cad $ or HK $??

$4000 .. sounds like average price here for wedding photography ... but if in HK .. I know price is lower .. but won't be that low??

作者: chowB 時間: 2010-3-31 13:19

You get what you pay for la! I don't feel sorry for the bride at all..! But then.. that photograph ...
chobit 發表於 2010-3-31 13:05

I first thought it's HK$1000 for a whole day service and I also felt like the same as you. But you see, it's HK$1000 for only 2 hours! It's already above regular market price among freelancers. The problem was not about the price, it's because the bride refused to communicate with the photographer beforehand lor.

作者: khaki 時間: 2010-3-31 13:23

Are they talking Cad $ or HK $??

$4000 .. sounds like average price here for wedding photography .. ...
Catpiano 發表於 2010-3-31 13:05

HK$ ar. I'm not sure about HK market price but from the article and the fan page, $4000HKD is probably a market price for full day.

I agree with chobit, why so many people feel sorry for the bride, what you pay is what you get, but on the other hand the photographer didn't give her photos worth $1000, worse than photos I take using iphone lol

作者: B仔 時間: 2010-3-31 13:51

係好慘。。。不過唔係好抵可憐～

作者: B仔 時間: 2010-3-31 13:58

啱啱SEARCH完
D相真係幾。。。。CREATIVE LOL

作者: Catpiano 時間: 2010-3-31 14:13

For $1,000 .. if HKD .. ( $130 cad ) of course won't be good la..

Even just 2 hr, but also plus post editing time .. ( probaby JUST SHOOT this case )

Most wedding package will be $10K HKD plus ( full day, 2 photographers ) or $4K cad here la..

作者: fibbi 時間: 2010-3-31 14:24

Style is one issue...but the picture with the FINGER...unforgivable la!
Both sides have problem la...they don't communicate in the first place... and of course....u pay what u get.

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2010-3-31 14:31

If you talk about fair value, then 90% of wedding photographers in Vancouver should fold their business.

作者: khaki 時間: 2010-3-31 14:39

If you talk about fair value, then 90% of wedding photographers in Vancouver should fold their busin ...
快樂牛郎發表於 2010-3-31 14:31

wedding & funeral business no fair value

作者: chowB 時間: 2010-3-31 14:48

For $1,000 .. if HKD .. ( $130 cad ) of course won't be good la..

Even just 2 hr, but also plus ...
Catpiano 發表於 2010-3-31 14:13

People in HK say HK$4000 is an average market price for full day wor, I think HK$1000 for 2 hours is more than fair la, without talking about the style.

作者: chowB 時間: 2010-3-31 14:49

If you talk about fair value, then 90% of wedding photographers in Vancouver should fold their busin ...
快樂牛郎發表於 2010-3-31 14:31

Haha......... i'm about to say, [fair value] and [market price] measure differently. lol

作者: Prelude 時間: 2010-3-31 14:53

I can't find the photos.

作者: 布小熊 時間: 2010-3-31 15:00

For $1,000 .. if HKD .. ( $130 cad ) of course won't be good la..

Even just 2 hr, but also plus ...
Catpiano 發表於 2010-3-31 02:13 PM

I didn't know that HK wedding photographer is so low...
I think my friend paid >$10,000 HK for theirs.

作者: Catpiano 時間: 2010-3-31 15:07

I didn't know that HK wedding photographer is so low...
I think my friend paid >$10,000 HK for the ...
布小熊發表於 2010-3-31 15:00

That is what I mean .. I haven't heard anyone paid less then $10K ... ( decent job )

I mean, I am happy to just charge $1000 HKD .. and using my iphone to take pic ...

I think the newpaper means $4,000 HKD is average for ~ 2 hr job ( probably 4-6 hr extra time on PP )

Problem is, nowadays, everyone can be a "photographer" .. lots of people that I know, they charge less, ( Say $1k cad ) for wedding, and they are IT people, doing wedding photo as side job, as they know how to PS .... not that bad outcome, but not great for sure.

However, few LYK I met here, are good photographers, their wedding pictures are awesome! ^_^

作者: khaki 時間: 2010-3-31 16:17

http://w3ww.dchome.net/viewthrea ... p;extra=&page=1

作者: khaki 時間: 2010-3-31 16:19

啱啱SEARCH完
D相真係幾。。。。CREATIVE LOL
B仔發表於 2010-3-31 13:58

個攝影師解釋她的style係capture lively moment先夠應景！

作者: Catpiano 時間: 2010-3-31 16:27

Oh .. how come in SONY section?

She is using SONY??

May be .. she found out the GROOM is actually her "EX BF" ??

By the way .. I dont get it .. about this comment -->

"第一次見「婚禮攝影師」用TV mode.."

What's wrong with TV mode? I use TV mode a lots wor ..

Ng tone use "

MODE" all the time mei??

作者: khaki 時間: 2010-3-31 16:33

I didn't know that HK wedding photographer is so low...
I think my friend paid >$10,000 HK for the ...
布小熊發表於 2010-3-31 15:00

Freelancer can be very very low in HK. Few years ago back to film days I've heard $2000HKD for both photo+video, film processing extra.

作者: Catpiano 時間: 2010-3-31 16:38

Freelancer can be very very low in HK. Few years ago back to film days I've heard $2000HKD fo ...
khaki 發表於 2010-3-31 16:33

Even many many years ago ..  more then that la...

Again, it depends ..  like my wedding, all the photographers are my friends, they only charged me friendship price.. (as they are pro photographers, I didn't want them to take pic free)

Anyway, how do we know that is the truth? may be those are just some pictures taken by cell phone? DC? but not from the photographer  "IRAS" ??

作者: khaki 時間: 2010-3-31 16:43

Anyway, how do we know that is the truth? may be those are just some pictures taken by cell phone? DC? but not from the photographer "IRAS" ??

Actually her "fan page" explains it all. There is also a reply from the photographer too, check FB la

作者: tofu 時間: 2010-3-31 17:17

i searched iras hong kong, but couldn't find anything. but on the other hand. how can she risk her own wedding if she is so care about the pics. $1000 is really cheap, if you get a friend to do the job for you, you pay more than that for.

作者: raima 時間: 2010-3-31 19:22

is it this one here?

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Ph ... 1414386564?v=photos

作者: chowB 時間: 2010-3-31 19:33

is it this one here?
raima 發表於 2010-3-31 19:22

Bingo! lol

作者: khaki 時間: 2010-3-31 19:49

睇fan page d人講，成批相係冇editing冇delete bad pictures就比左個客，gum $1000就係ok。如果全日收$4000唔執相我都覺得ok！執相workload分分鐘多過wedding day當日10x架嘛，成千幾二千張真係$10000HKD起碼囉

其實個客cheap到gum倒不如cheap到盡搵個friend用手機影算啦

作者: 小叻 時間: 2010-3-31 20:25

mmm~ 係影得差左D~ 但係諗住貪平應該遇左既~ 但又唔可以怪晒個新娘既~ 至少個攝影師影相個陣應該叫一叫D人望下鏡頭~同埋幫手睇下D人係咪全部入鏡丫~ 明知有D影唔到又唔出聲~ 有D求其囉~ 但個新郎哥又係既~成日周圍望唔知做乜﹗

作者: sheep 時間: 2010-3-31 20:42

技術算OK喇好過好多人啦
IDEA 就另類啲接唔接受就睇人喇

作者: khaki 時間: 2010-3-31 21:55

mmm~ 係影得差左D~ 但係諗住貪平應該遇左既~ 但又唔可以怪晒個新娘既~ 至少個攝影師影相個陣應該叫一叫D人 ...
小叻發表於 2010-3-31 20:25

可以話係累鬥累哈哈

作者: 邊少 時間: 2010-3-31 22:01

http://feb0410.blogspot.com/

this is the photograher's reply abt the incident
all i can say is 佢唔好采遇著港女

作者: 小叻 時間: 2010-3-31 22:15

睇完其它相之後覺得唔係太差者~ 新娘子只係post D唔靚既相出黎~有誤導成分﹗唔洗做得甘絕﹗sigh~

作者: chowB 時間: 2010-3-31 22:24

但個新郎哥又係既~成日周圍望唔知做乜﹗
小叻發表於 2010-3-31 20:25

My guess, instead of the photographer asking people to have the shoot taken, it's the groom looking around to gather his friends and relatives lor.

作者: Catpiano 時間: 2010-3-31 22:30

本帖最後由 Catpiano 於 2010-3-31 22:32 編輯

CHEAP!

How come the pictures from IRAS's blog, are SO MUCH better??

Those pictures from facebook, are NOT nice .. however, may not ALL pic, when I looked at some so called "

RO" photographers, they may take ~ 2000 plus pic, and only 200-300 end products, (great picture) of course, some pictures won't be good ..

I guess the problem is, IRAS should at least do some cropping and editing BEFORE she passed those pic to her clients .. but again, that CD, may NOT be the final product .. or that is only STAGE 1, for $1000 ..  as many photographers, will have a BASIC price, then PLUS PLUS PLUS .. for whatever editiong their clients want.

Anyway, just friendly remind, for those PHOTOGRAPHERS, should just offer FINAL files to their clients. (in general)

Some comments from facebook are dumb ..  who said indoor MUST use HIGH ISO? and outdoor MUST use LOW ISO?? how about back to film time?  ISO adjustment is just one good tool from DSLR.

And what the heck wrong is using TV mode?? photographer can always PRE SET the min and max aperture, so with high shutter speed not mean will ONLY use the max aperture ...

Nowadays, just way so many "C HING" think they are photography experts la....

Well, I feel bad with Iras.

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2010-3-31 22:31

wedding photos 從來都係靠把口多過靠相機
結婚果個都唔慌識欣賞
影咁好做咩
今次遇著件垃圾
都算唔好彩

作者: ricrick 時間: 2010-3-31 22:59

本帖最後由 ricrick 於 2010-3-31 23:00 編輯

又是港女累事
又貪平，又挑剔，可謂，自作自受，吾低可憐

我同情攝影師，雖然真係好屎
but You get what you pay for

作者: 邊少 時間: 2010-3-31 23:10

你地睇下新娘同佢Ｄ姊妹係fb個groupＤcomments先死
只要一有人幫個photograher半句就比佢地詛咒你結婚時一樣乃野另+7799小你蝦蟹
sigh~~

作者: Purpleheart 時間: 2010-4-1 00:03

又貪平，又挑剔，可謂，自作自受，吾低可憐

ricrick 發表於 2010-3-31 22:59

Exactly!!

作者: Catpiano 時間: 2010-4-1 06:50

又是港女累事
又貪平，又挑剔，可謂，自作自受，吾低可憐
我同情攝影師，雖然真係好屎
but You get what you pay for ...
ricrick 發表於 2010-3-31 22:59

Agree!

And the bride looks better then her fb picture already!!

作者: 布小熊 時間: 2010-4-1 07:53

Anyone have the link to the photographer's flickr pictures? I want to see the "normal" pictures that she took.

作者: 布小熊 時間: 2010-4-1 09:58

回復 42# 布小熊
I found it. Her photos are not bad. Wedding set was alright. (not super bad nor good but the bride is very pretty. specially in her gold and white evening gown)

Her other pictures are better. Not everyone can do wedding photography. So I think that honger bride.. should... accept what she've chosen. And it's unfair to post ONLY the bad shots. If what the photographer said is the truth, this is also partly a problem with lack of communication. I don't uderstand why the bride refused to meet before the wedding????

作者: daimo 時間: 2010-4-1 10:17

回復 38# ricrick

that i totally agree.

作者: B仔 時間: 2010-4-1 10:21

Bear Bear,
個新娘。。。個樣靚咩？係嗰個"CECILIA APPLE"喎～～個樣都。。。幾。。。成熟。

honger bride... lmao

我AGREE唔係個個影結婚相都掂
不過有D唔係望鏡頭嘅相都OK丫
咁當然，如果HONGER BRIDE係想要嗰D"成棚人棟篤排排企"嘅STYLE嘅相，咁佢就睇PORTFOLIO嗰陣應該知有呢種STYLE啦～

作者: 布小熊 時間: 2010-4-1 10:25

回復 45# B仔
no I am talking about the caucasian bride in the wedding pictures that Iras took last year.

作者: B仔 時間: 2010-4-1 10:27

回復 46# 布小熊

ohhhhh

作者: Catpiano 時間: 2010-4-1 10:33

Cecilia Apple ..

Even in Alberta ... just average ...

作者: somewhereintime 時間: 2010-4-1 10:37

Even many many years ago .. more then that la...

Again, it depends .. like my wedding, all the ...
Catpiano 發表於 2010-3-31 16:38

Post your wedding pix please

作者: 布小熊 時間: 2010-4-1 10:45

Cecilia Apple ..

Even in Alberta ... just average ...
Catpiano 發表於 2010-4-1 10:33 AM

NOT talking about that apple girl.... I am saying the caucasian bride (Ｍarie) is pretty.
... that Apple is just a "Kong Girl"

作者: chobit 時間: 2010-4-1 10:55

Maybe that's in HK! Not here wor! I have found both Vancouver-Chinese & Seattle folks very picky la!

It's possible that they have seen enough of wedding photos, and know what to expect to be good!

Knowing how to talk however would be part of the requirements, since that's how you communicate with the couple =D

wedding photos 從來都係靠把口多過靠相機
結婚果個都唔慌識欣賞
影咁好做咩
今次遇著件垃圾
都算唔好彩 ...
快樂牛郎發表於 2010-3-31 22:31

作者: chobit 時間: 2010-4-1 11:03

Speaking as a professional photographer, it is actually the photographer responsibility to select the better photos, and discard the crappy ones.

eg. I always take a couple more shots for the important group shots, since I know it's very likely that someone would blink their eyes..! And at the end, I would only pick the best 1 or 2 for the clients, and exclude the ones that don't look right..!

Or if I accidentlly show my finger on the photo, I for sure would either crop it, or discard it if I have better one available.

The photog. mention editing is not included in the package, but don't you think the photos should require little to no editing in the first place???

睇完其它相之後覺得唔係太差者~ 新娘子只係post D唔靚既相出黎~有誤導成分﹗唔洗做得甘絕﹗sigh~ ...
小叻發表於 2010-3-31 22:15

作者: chobit 時間: 2010-4-1 11:08

Hey.. that sounds like me (I do charge more than $1K haha).

I am in IT, and work as a part time pro wedding photog wor!!

My Weddings (kind of old) Photos: (Password: Temppass1
http://www.pbase.com/freelancerfoto/selected_wedding_photos

=D

That is what I mean .. I haven't heard anyone paid less then $10K ... ( decent job )

I mean, ...
Catpiano 發表於 2010-3-31 15:07

作者: Catpiano 時間: 2010-4-1 11:28

本帖最後由 Catpiano 於 2010-4-1 11:29 編輯

EL, you are right .. here (Van and Seattle) are very different .. people here, are in general more picky .. however, price is 2-3 times more here too .. (labor cost is much higher ... )

Some photographers I know here, they take good pic, but send to China for touch up, (skin +teeth + eyes, or even SLIM the body ... ) so .. instead of spending 30 hours .. just spend $100 or so ....

No matter how good the photographer is, can't help with bad skin, eye bag, yellow teeth, and body fat ...

作者: daimo 時間: 2010-4-1 11:45

Post your wedding pix please
somewhereintime 發表於 2010-4-1 10:37

CP's wife is hot.

作者: khaki 時間: 2010-4-1 12:34

回復布小熊
I found it. Her photos are not bad. Wedding set was alright. (not super bad nor good b ...
布小熊發表於 2010-4-1 09:58

wa.... you found them on flickr?

作者: chowB 時間: 2010-4-1 12:35

回復布小熊
I found it. Her photos are not bad. Wedding set was alright. (not super bad nor good b ...
布小熊發表於 2010-4-1 09:58

Where is it? I wanna see too! Pls post the link here or pm me! (hehehehe..............)

作者: Catpiano 時間: 2010-4-1 12:47

CP's wife is hot.
daimo 發表於 2010-4-1 11:45

Hey hey .. you want me to pose your wife pic? and see who is hotter?? lol

作者: samsung 時間: 2010-4-1 13:46

it doesn't really matter... study says ppl married more than once nowadays

作者: samsung 時間: 2010-4-1 13:47

又是港女累事
又貪平，又挑剔，可謂，自作自受，吾低可憐

我同情攝影師，雖然真係好屎
but You get what y ...
ricrick 發表於 2010-3-31 22:59

作者: khaki 時間: 2010-4-1 16:53

Wow got a Chance to look at the Caucasians pics.

Big difference, but obviously the "photographer" was just a guest shooter of that wedding, she's definitely not a pro who can handle a paid job. However this set at least have ok shots and got a flash lot. Wonder why she didn't bring/use flash at cecilia's wedding.

Well both sides responsibility. Photographer also got some 欺騙成份 if she tell the bride the flickr set is a job but the truth is, she was just shooting as a guest. Well this happens all the time, everywhere, no surprise

作者: Purpleheart 時間: 2010-4-1 17:40

陰謀論

介紹呢位攝影師俾個新娘既朋友一定係新郎既 ex / 情敵
只係個新娘唔知, 懞盛盛以為可以慳返筆

作者: khaki 時間: 2010-4-1 19:17

陰謀論

介紹呢位攝影師俾個新娘既朋友一定係新郎既 ex / 情敵
只係個新娘唔知, 懞盛盛以為可以慳返筆 ...
Purpleheart 發表於 2010-4-1 17:40

i thought about that too....LOL

作者: chowB 時間: 2010-4-1 20:47

OK, finally I got a chance to browse thru chobit's link and that HK photographer's flickr la. IMO, those pics on that flickr ain't bad at all and almost as good as chobit's ones bor, pretty acceptable wor. Why and what made her shoot cecil's wedding like that is a mystery. Perhaps what Purpleheart said is true. LOL

作者: ricrick 時間: 2010-4-2 09:44

Wow got a Chance to look at the Caucasians pics.

Big difference, but obviously the "photographer" w ...
khaki 發表於 2010-4-1 16:53

where is the link?

作者: Bikki 時間: 2010-4-3 00:45

well , the pics on the photographer's blog are ok... the bride just posted all the bad ones.. but ya.. the photographer should only select and edit them 1st before she sent them to the couple la..

作者: Catpiano 時間: 2010-4-3 07:09

well , the pics on the photographer's blog are ok... the bride just posted all the bad ones.. but ya ...
Bikki 發表於 2010-4-3 00:45

Well, usually, photographers will show "DRAFT" pictures(all sometimes) to their clients (usually water marked, and in very small size)

Again, depends .. this case, I guess Iras just burn all 260 pictures, and give to the bride, say 1/5 is bad, 3/5 is OK, and 1/5 is not bad/good.

However, why the bride only showed all the bad pic .. then who knows? why and who the heck on earth, likes to show their bad wedding pic?

作者: chowB 時間: 2010-4-3 08:32

Not to say the set of pics are stylish or artistic, but showing the bad pics are just too stupid la. Referring to Catpiano's suggested portion, the client was paying $1000 in total and the break down was $600 for OK pics and $200 for not bad/good pics and $200 for the bad pics! If I were the client, at least I will think why I should pay $200 for the crappy pics ah?!

作者: ricrick 時間: 2010-4-3 15:03

my next project will be naked couples.. anybody volunteer?

作者: Nox 時間: 2010-4-4 09:09

貪平累事啦！
如果學生都可以出來接job，
咁做咗幾十年嘅專業攝影師仲洗出來做嘅？
又要馬兒好，又要馬兒唔吃草，多幾個炮灰case等D人學下尊重professional，
唔好以為拿住部DSLR就係攝影師，用得下photoshop就係designer

創意有價，專業嘢俾乞兒價，唔抵可憐

作者: khaki 時間: 2010-4-4 12:57

唔好以為拿住部DSLR就係攝影師，用得下photoshop就係designer
Nox 發表於 2010-4-4 09:09

there are tons of these people everywhere, well even a few TW wedding photo studios here they only hire someone who 拿住部DSLR, or photographer bring one assistant and pretend to be 2 photographers and charge you $3000 for a wedding day package, beware.

有時對新人自己唔睇清楚又貪平又要求多多又係抵死，人生大事不能馬虎

歡迎光臨溫哥華老友記討論區 (http://www.loyaukee.com/forum/)