Board logo

標題: 世 博 今 煙 花 開 幕 照 亮 夜 上 海 [打印本頁]

作者: peter236    時間: 2010-4-29 17:33     標題: 世 博 今 煙 花 開 幕 照 亮 夜 上 海

http://www.singtao.com/yesterday/chi/0430eo01.html

(星島日報報道)上海世界博覽會今晚八時將舉行盛大開幕式,除了比北京奧運更大規模的煙花匯演外,還有結合高科技的文藝表演,演出者包括歌唱家宋祖英、港星成龍、鋼琴王子郎朗等,歷時一個半小時。國家主席胡錦濤及各國政要將親臨現場。世博園明早將舉行開園儀式,象徵為期半年世博正式展開。

  上海世博會今晚八時將在世博文化中心舉行開幕式,由國家主席胡錦濤宣布世博會開幕,並迎來所有參展國旗入場。多位現任及退休國家領導人,以及法國總統薩爾科齊、南韓總統李明博等數十名外國政要出席儀式。胡錦濤昨晨已提前抵達上海巡視園區,參觀了中國館、美國館等多個展館。

  世博開幕式分兩部分:一是在形似飛碟的世博文化中
心進行開幕儀式和文藝表演,二是在黃浦江兩岸進行室外燈光噴泉煙花表演。文藝表演包括《相約上海》、《江河情緣》、《世界共襄》和《致世博》四個章節,參演人員三千五百人;煙花表演由三個篇章組成:《中國歡迎你》、《歡聚在世博》和《世界共歡慶》,技術人員一千五百人。

  據《南方日報》報道,開幕式充滿夢幻色彩,舞台以巨大的LED幕牆為背景,根據節目的進行,切換出立體、絢麗的四維4D場景,牆面燈光時而七彩轉換,時而展開綠葉畫卷,色彩斑斕令整個舞台熠熠生輝。

  文藝表演主持人由楊瀾、吳大維等四位名嘴擔任。宋祖英和成龍將為開幕式拉開序幕,曾放歌北京奧運開幕式的軍旅歌唱家譚晶則將聯合孫楠、廖昌永和上海歌唱家黃英作壓軸演出。毛阿敏、劉媛媛、周華健也將演唱《相約上海》,鋼琴王子郎朗現場與交響樂團演奏中國經典樂曲。日本歌手谷村新司、意大利盲人演唱家安德烈‧波伽利(Andrea Bocelli)、美國音樂教父昆西‧瓊斯(Quincy Jones)等多位世界級歌星也將登台獻藝。到晚會最後,五大片LED幕牆將合成一個蔚藍翠綠的地球,將現場氣氛推至高潮。

   文藝表演後是半小時的煙花盛宴,象徵覑熱情和愛的「心形」煙花,像雨般灑向黃浦江兩岸。同時,幾百艘亮覑花燈、掛覑參展國國旗的帆船在黃浦江上航行,中心廣場的音樂噴泉伴隨覑煙花起舞,打造「火樹銀花夜上海,飈紫嫣紅黃浦江」的美景。明日上午八點半,世博園還將舉行簡約的開園儀式。國家領導人將在主席台按動一把金色鑰匙「擧動按鈕」裝置,象徵上海正式進入「世博時間」。
2010-04-30
作者: mukmuk2    時間: 2010-4-29 18:27

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: Lik    時間: 2010-4-29 18:34

有聞話今次上海世博使咗 RMB 4200億,唔知其中用咗幾多來燒煙花呢?

如果啲錢唔用來搞世博,而係用來響汶川或者玉樹起樓、起學校,咁地震嘅死傷又會係咩數字呢?

-力
作者: mukmuk2    時間: 2010-4-29 18:38

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: mcjohnjohn    時間: 2010-4-29 19:01

4200億, 都真係好多woh, 唔知用左o係邊呢? 有冇一份財政報告話d 錢使左o係邊一度, 等大家參考一下係唔係用得其所?
作者: tofu    時間: 2010-4-29 19:49

4200億? probably $3000億 is in the 領導s' pocket.
作者: mcjohnjohn    時間: 2010-4-29 19:55

4200億? probably $3000億 is in the 領導s' pocket.
tofu 發表於 2010-4-30 11:49

起碼4100億啦~ 你咁睇少佢地架! 哈哈~
呢d 咁既細show, 比著係我就一百萬搞掂. 好簡單, 用99萬求其o係黃埔灘租個1000平方呎既area. 每個國家比10平方呎佢用, d 國家可以用盡果10平方呎擺佢地既國家照片, 咁就一個世界博覽law, 死未!
作者: MoiRhapsody    時間: 2010-4-29 20:02

如果有一百億救災?????
作者: peter236    時間: 2010-4-29 20:53

本帖最後由 peter236 於 2010-4-29 21:15 編輯
4200億? probably $3000億 is in the 領導s' pocket.
tofu 發表於 2010-4-29 19:49

hahaha, be careful wor, if you do not have evidence, they can sue you for defamation and slander.

Like I said, the rise of China is drawing a lot of jealousy and sour grapes, from both foreigners and self-hating people.

From what I know, the money was probably spent on infrastructure in Shanghai which can further promote economic development, like new subway lines, new airport expansion at Honqiao, the development of the Bund area, relocation of residents to new housing from old housing at the Expo site etc, and of course the actual preparation of the Shanghai Expo itself. The other countries pay for the building of their own pavilions.
作者: Lik    時間: 2010-4-29 21:43

無錯,唔少錢當然係放咗響好多對城市有建設嘅地方同項目之上,但千其唔好忘記,其實上海亦係一個極有歷史嘅城市,而老共最鍾意果啲「發展就係硬道理」嘅過時諗法亦破壞(甚至呼摧毀)咗好多呢個城市嘅 heritage:

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1983788,00.html
But in the rush for the new, Shanghai is losing some of what made it unique. Wujiang Road, once euphemistically called Love Lane, was a center for prostitution in prewar Shanghai and was later known for its snack stalls. Over the past year, it has been rebuilt into a generic pedestrian mall with Starbucks and Krispy Kreme outlets. "The downside is that over the last 18 months, we've probably lost more old buildings than in the last dozen years. That's the saddest part for me," says Shanghai-based author and consultant Paul French, as we sit in one of Wujiang Road's new coffee shops. Among the destruction French has documented: stained-glass windows smashed out of the former Jesuit Recoleta Mission to make room for beds to house laborers at the expo; the 106-year-old Shanghai Rowing Club torn down last year as part of the Bund's redevelopment; and parts of the city's former Jewish enclave, including the glamorous White Horse Inn, demolished.

French has an old photo of Earl Whaley and Red Hot Syncopators, an all-black band from Seattle that played in the mid-'30s at the St. Anna Ballroom, at the end of Wujiang Road. What's left of the ballroom is now behind a blue fence advertising the expo. Two workmen survey the site in the shadow of a giant excavator. Not even official preservation orders have managed to stop the relentless destruction of Shanghai's beautiful old buildings. The urge to destroy the old isn't new in Shanghai. Its city walls were largely demolished in 1912. But conservationists point to Tianzifang, a shikumen-style neighborhood that has been filled in recent years with stylish shops and restaurants, as an example of how Shanghai can develop while maintaining its old charm — though not all residents see it that way. Chen Yuzhen, 90, a retired acupuncturist, says that for all the upgrading of her neighborhood, "we still don't have toilets [in our homes]."

呢啲古蹟同歷史文化遺缺,拆咗、打爛咗就無㗎啦,但老共嘅「發展就係硬道理」同埋一向死要面子、有得搞大個牌場就搞大個牌場嘅一貫做法就實在太過暴發戶思想啦。

唉...

-力
作者: peter236    時間: 2010-4-29 21:53

本帖最後由 peter236 於 2010-4-29 22:20 編輯
無錯,唔少錢當然係放咗響好多對城市有建設嘅地方同項目之上,但千其唔好忘記,其實上海亦係一個極有歷史嘅 ...
Lik 發表於 2010-4-29 21:43

hahaha, you moron, do you know a lot of these older buildings were about to collapse, like some of those in Hong Kong?
These conservationists don't realize that there are still people living in these old buildings, where there are no elevators or toilets. Of course these conservationists do not live in it themselves and don't pay for the maintenance.

Some old buildings are certainly worth preserving, but not those without too much character.
作者: peter236    時間: 2010-4-29 22:05

Shanghai to restore historic Bund buildings before World Expo

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2009-08/10/content_11855844.htm

BEIJING, Aug. 10 (Xinhua) -- Restoration of historic "Bund Origin" buildings, including the recently saved Shanghai Rowing Club, has started and is expected to be finished before the 2010 World Expo starts in May, the Shanghai Daily reported Monday.

    Construction authorities were quoted by the English newspaper as saying the "Bund Origin" area, regarded as the origin of the Bund and the city, is 170,000 square meters centered on the confluence of the Huangpu River and Suzhou Creek.

    The area contains many historic buildings and 14 of them are on the city's protected buildings list, which means they cannot be torn down.

    Scaffolding has been erected outside the buildings to repair damaged parts, and architecture experts have been invited to make restoration plans and help find tiles and wood flooring similar to the original materials.

    The buildings will be also developed to improve their function, Pan Yihua, from the Shanghai New Huangpu Real Estate Co Ltd, the developer of the "Bund Origin", was quoted as saying by the newspaper.

    The former British Consulate, built in 1873, will be turned into a public place that can hold major events and art exhibitions. A total of 18,000 square meters of insignificant buildings around the former consulate will be demolished to make a public park on the Bund.

    The restored Union Church, built in 1866, is expected to house a local civil affairs department office for issuing marriage certificates.

    The church was almost demolished after a big fire in the abandoned building in 2007 but was saved by public protest.

    The Shanghai Rowing Club did not originally make the city's protected buildings list and was earmarked for demolition last month but it was found to have high historical value during the development of the "Bund Origin" project and has been saved.

作者: peter236    時間: 2010-4-29 22:07

本帖最後由 peter236 於 2010-4-29 22:20 編輯

The Shanghai Rowing Club was actually selected to be preserved and restored. I don't know why the Time magazine article lied about it. Just another lie from the American media.
作者: ricrick    時間: 2010-4-29 23:52

本帖最後由 ricrick 於 2010-4-29 23:55 編輯

和諧的社會,需要有peter仔呢D無知及無良知的人,先夠和諧
作者: mukmuk2    時間: 2010-4-30 05:29

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: MAXIMUS    時間: 2010-4-30 06:14

The great master moron rocks
作者: mukmuk2    時間: 2010-4-30 07:21

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: Catpiano    時間: 2010-4-30 07:21

和諧的社會,需要有peter仔呢D無知及無良的人,先夠和諧
ricrick 發表於 2010-4-29 23:52



    Way way way ..  ricrick ..

I dont agree peter仔 is 無知 wor ..  but ...
作者: MAXIMUS    時間: 2010-4-30 10:20

回復 17# mukmuk2

He is going to flood the forum with super mega pictures
so that we have little portion to post anything else
作者: tofu    時間: 2010-4-30 16:19

"""relocation of residents to new housing from old housing at the Expo site etc,"""

do those residents ever get market value price?  or do they ever get pay to move.....well this is another sad things in china, ("big cin")  forced to move by gov't and developer.  and who get all the money???
作者: tofu    時間: 2010-4-30 16:25

hahaha, be careful wor, if you do not have evidence, they can sue you for defamation and slander.

hahaha, i am in canada, if you want to sue me, you need to prove i  defame you.  
the another way around only works in china la.
作者: peter236    時間: 2010-4-30 16:28

本帖最後由 peter236 於 2010-4-30 16:32 編輯
"""relocation of residents to new housing from old housing at the Expo site etc,"""

do those reside ...
tofu 發表於 2010-4-30 16:19

I don't know much they receive. But at least new housing provided is much better than old housing where there was no elevators, proper toilets or heating.
How much do you think a decades old apartment without elevators, proper toilets or heating is worth?
You would think that new apartments with elevators, toilets and heating are worth a lot more.
作者: mukmuk2    時間: 2010-4-30 20:02

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: MAXIMUS    時間: 2010-5-1 15:54

haha you are really trying to debating with peter jai?
mukmuk2 發表於 2010-4-30 20:02


Just fun to watch them stumbling and got insane




歡迎光臨 溫哥華老友記討論區 (http://www.loyaukee.com/forum/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2