溫哥華老友記討論區 - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: 兼兩職儲老婆本好仔暴斃早6晚11 月入1.1萬 [打印本頁]

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2010-7-24 17:58 標題: 兼兩職儲老婆本好仔暴斃早6晚11 月入1.1萬

【明報專訊】23歲勤奮青年為儲錢結婚，由早至晚在兩間茶餐廳做水吧工作，數天前患上感冒未癒，仍要「早6晚11」，日做17小時，他昨午與女友到佐敦吃午飯時突然昏迷，雖有人即場替他急救，一度回復微弱呼吸和心跳，惟送院搶救後返魂乏術。

死者母親趕往醫院，得悉噩耗後悲痛欲絕，一時間無法接受兒子猝死，與死者拍拖3年多的女友更非常傷心。家人透露，死者黃子健（阿健）本月19日患上感冒，一直有服藥，惟多日來仍未痊癒。有心臟科醫生表示，死者很大可能因心律不正常猝死，工作勞累及感冒可能是病發誘因。

We need more people like this guy.

作者: Catpiano 時間: 2010-7-24 18:07

本帖最後由 Catpiano 於 2010-7-24 18:09 編輯

【明報專訊】
We need more people like this guy.
快樂牛郎發表於 2010-7-24 17:58

How could you say that? so you want your future son .. be one of them?? or be the one to kill your wife and daughter??

He may be dumb to work 17/hr a day ... but what do you think his parents' feeling now??

作者: Lik 時間: 2010-7-24 18:08

特衰政府就算見到市民嘅棺材都唔流眼淚，皆因個個高官過住嘅都係神仙一般嘅生活：住洋樓、嘆紅酒，出入淨係每年做個樣搭一次公共交通工具來響應無車日。試問又點會識得咩叫做民間疾苦呀？

香港人，都係自求多福吧啦～

-力

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2010-7-24 18:19

How could you say that? so you want your future son .. be one of them?? or be the one to kill ...
Catpiano 發表於 2010/7/24 18:07

I am saying we need more hardworking people like this guy, instead of those who just sit in front of their computers and complain.

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2010-7-24 18:22

特衰政府就算見到市民嘅棺材都唔流眼淚，皆因個個高官過住嘅都係神仙一般嘅生活：住洋樓、嘆紅酒，出入淨係 ...
Lik 發表於 2010/7/24 18:08

民間疾苦? Do people just have unrealistic expectations of themselves? This guy saved money to get married. Apparently this is a personal choice. If you were so poor to begin with, why do you want to get married? And why do you need to save to get married? Is his girlfriend only looking after his money?

作者: zoids 時間: 2010-7-24 18:36

民間疾苦? Do people just have unrealistic expectations of themselves? This guy saved money to get ...
快樂牛郎發表於 2010-7-24 18:22

So if someone has no money, they shouldn't get married? what's next? no money no school? no money no family physician?

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2010-7-24 18:44

So if someone has no money, they shouldn't get married? what's next? no money no school? no mo ...
zoids 發表於 2010/7/24 18:36

Education is the only thing I support to be provided for free. This gives everyone a chance to succeed. Other things like healthcare and housing, of course they shouldnt' be free.

作者: godavid 時間: 2010-7-24 19:45

if we need this kid
the hk would be game over in few years

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2010-7-24 20:24

if we need this kid
the hk would be game over in few years
godavid 發表於 2010/7/24 19:45

oh? so you are saying hk would be over if everybody works 17 hours a day? care to explain your logic?

作者: 嘉嘉 時間: 2010-7-24 21:55

everybody works 17hrs/day, everybody dies early

作者: peter236 時間: 2010-7-24 21:58

What has this to do with the government? In Japan, most people are overworked. It is part of Japanese culture.

作者: godavid 時間: 2010-7-24 21:58

oh? so you are saying hk would be over if everybody works 17 hours a day? care to explain your logic?
快樂牛郎發表於 2010-7-24 20:24

if everyone works 17hours and over
and end up death
how would hk survive?
and more chinese people from china would conquer HK

作者: tofu 時間: 2010-7-24 22:52

儲老婆本及供車捱兩份工日做 17小時　準新郎猝死
阿健日捱夜捱，月入合共一萬餘元, 只為與三年前結識的姓伍女朋友明年結婚儲老婆本。加上月前阿健買了私家車要供車會

why he needs a car and a wedding party? "if his head is not big enough, he should buy a smaller hat". earning $10k, but need to make car payment, insurance, parking & gas, how much can he safe. i just feel sorry to his parents.

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2010-7-24 23:03

if everyone works 17hours and over
and end up death
how would hk survive?
and more chinese people from china would conquer HK
godavid 發表於 2010/7/24 21:58

don't worry
HK has way more people than there should be
so even just 80% of them survive, it will be fine

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2010-7-24 23:04

why he needs a car and a wedding party? "if his head is not big enough, he should buy a smaller hat". earning $10k, but need to make car payment, insurance, parking & gas, how much can he safe. i just feel sorry to his parents.
tofu 發表於 2010/7/24 22:52

precisely
this is a personal choice

but obviously people would just pick a few points and bash the government for this

people who bash the government are mostly just trying to avoid responsibility or finding a scapegoat.

作者: peter236 時間: 2010-7-24 23:07

precisely
this is a personal choice

but obviously people would just pick a few points and bash th ...
快樂牛郎發表於 2010-7-24 23:04

Mr. Lik is this type of people who likes to blame the HK government.

作者: ricrick 時間: 2010-7-25 00:33

this story tell you to not have any dream when u only earn $5500/job
but he already has more then $33/hr.. too bad

作者: godavid 時間: 2010-7-25 00:37

don't worry
HK has way more people than there should be
so even just 80% of them survive, it will ...
快樂牛郎發表於 2010-7-24 23:03

i bet 80% will have a chance of death

作者: godavid 時間: 2010-7-25 00:39

this story tell you to not have any dream when u only earn $5500/job
but he already has more then $3 ...
ricrick 發表於 2010-7-25 00:33

why do you need to work over 10 hours?

作者: yayaya 時間: 2010-7-25 00:42

我想cow boy的意思是说 we need more people like 净系识用劳力唔识用脑力稳食，做死一世既廉价劳工

作者: LOK 時間: 2010-7-25 09:35

儲老婆本及供車捱兩份工日做 17小時　準新郎猝死
阿健日捱夜捱，月入合共一萬餘元, 只為與三年前結識的姓 ...
tofu 發表於 2010-7-24 22:52

Exactly. Why does he need a car? If he could only make "一萬餘元" while he works two jobs and 17 hrs per day, he should learn how to spend his money wisely.

作者: Catpiano 時間: 2010-7-25 09:36

I am saying we need more hardworking people like this guy, instead of those who just sit in front ...
快樂牛郎發表於 2010-7-24 18:19

Oh well .. true .. but not 17/hr day ..

作者: sheep 時間: 2010-7-25 10:03

Exactly. Why does he need a car? If he could only make "一萬餘元" while he works two jobs and 17 ...
LOK 發表於 2010-7-25 09:35

he need a car, may be he is working late and need a fast way to get back home to rest for the next day. It might not be a expensive car, it might just for commute during after hours.

作者: LOK 時間: 2010-7-25 10:17

he need a car, may be he is working late and need a fast way to get back home to rest for the ...
sheep 發表於 2010-7-25 10:03

You are right. MAYBE he needs a car.
In most case, take taxi everyday after work might just cost the same. And it's not safe to drive home after 17 hrs work everyday.

作者: sheep 時間: 2010-7-25 10:26

You are right. MAYBE he needs a car.
In most case, take taxi everyday after work might just cost ...
LOK 發表於 2010-7-25 10:17

酒吧打烊起馬都四五點
有駕車點都好啲嘅
打的長途都幾赤

作者: 大C姐 時間: 2010-7-25 10:46

點講呢...... 我覺得雖然係個別例子(後生仔突然捽死)﹐但係都反映左呢一代生活困難例子。

有D人話﹐"車﹐你無錢就唔好結婚啦。無錢都可以結婚唔擺酒唔買樓唔洗錢姐"。但係有時唔係去揪一個好小嘅落眼點去拗﹐呢個例子若然唔係要儲老婆本而係要供養有病嘅阿媽係咪就慘D﹐多D人同情﹐件事會多D報導?

我覺得事實上朝6晚11真係唔止佢﹐而每一個人都有不同原因﹐有D養妻活兒﹐有D要還屋企人睹債﹐等等等等... 個lesson係點樣去察覺自己或者身邊同事朋友有呢個危機同風險。即係好似早陣子陳雄烈例子﹐我覺得都值得多D留意架。

作者: sheep 時間: 2010-7-25 10:47

阿健正職是在大角嘴的茶餐廳當水吧師傅，工作時間為下午12時至晚上11時。雷可畏透露，阿健3年多前工作時認識現時女友，最近更計劃與女友結婚，遂決心努力儲「老婆本」。約兩年前，阿健得朋友介紹到長沙灣一間茶餐廳兼職，約一個月前開始「日日返」，工作時間由早上6時至10時，兩分合計日做17小時，每天只有7小時休息，當中還未計算上下班乘車時間。據了解，阿健打兩份工，每月收入約1.1萬至1.2萬元

原來係咁

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2010-7-25 18:51

【明報專訊】「結婚，債務雪球就滾動起來。」30歲出頭的王小姐慨嘆，婚前和伴侶辛苦儲得30萬元，全用在婚禮擺酒，「一鋪清袋」，置業夢遙遠得恍如摘星。結婚近兩年，她和丈夫只能月租5000元的新界上水樓住，丈夫要兼職養家，「無計，為咗買樓生仔要頂硬上。見到老公日做10多個鐘，我都心痛」。

「為長輩為面子像做騷」

「結婚前，我們唔去旅行、唔亂消費，終於3年內儲了30萬元。」王小姐曾經掙扎，30萬元應該用作買樓首期還是搞婚禮？「最後都用來擺酒，因為長輩期望、面子、身邊人的閒言閒語，好大壓力」。她沒有奢華世紀婚禮，「但好多雜項開支，由酒席到親戚件衫都要錢。這是香港的結婚文化，像做騷」。

王小姐和打兩份工的丈夫月入共3萬元，「要儲得40萬元首期買樓，估計至少要5年。生仔的話，又要用多一筆，十年後可能都冇自己間屋……香港人，打工直至退休，只為間樓，那是成世人的包袱」。

盼復建居屋助夾心階層

王小姐和朋友近日聚首，大呻置業苦水，「真希望曾蔭權十月的施政報告有點具體措施，但我不敢有期望」她主動向「蝸居部落」發言人、天水圍區議員陸頌雄訴苦，希望代向政府反映復建居屋、協助夾心階層置業訴求。她說：「我的故事一點都不特別，我好多朋友和我一樣，結婚之後，一身債。」

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2010-7-25 18:53

見到老公日做10多個鐘，我都心痛

又窮又要充
點會唔做死呢
不過做死都叫做死得有尊嚴
唔係壞事

作者: MoiRhapsody 時間: 2010-7-25 19:01

丫～～～你條仆街係香港住過未

作者: Catpiano 時間: 2010-7-25 20:24

又窮又要充
點會唔做死呢
不過做死都叫做死得有尊嚴
唔係壞事
快樂牛郎發表於 2010-7-25 18:53

Ding .. don't be too "Hark Bok" la... people died ar .. u call this "唔係壞事" ...

作者: tofu 時間: 2010-7-26 19:16

this story tell you to not have any dream when u only earn $5500/job
but he already has more then $3 ...
ricrick 發表於 2010-7-25 00:33

$11000/26days/17hr = $25 wor

作者: Guy 時間: 2010-7-26 19:31

I wish i am not like that

作者: godavid 時間: 2010-7-26 20:49

what is the point making so much $?

作者: BiscottiGelato 時間: 2010-7-26 21:31

回復 15# 快樂牛郎

Can't really believe a capitalist like you would think so highly of the government, that you'd believe most of bash against government are rootless and only a mean to avoid responsibility.

Unless you truely believe that government of first world countries did not employ policies, which have directly or indirectly created the highest rich/poor disparity ratio ever since the Great Depression, then I'd have applaud your capacity in drinking Kool Aid the rich bureaucrats have been feeding.

Some people are deservitely poor because they are lazy. I don't disagree with that. Many tho, are poor because resources gravitates to the rich, making the rich richers for doing nothing (lazy), while the poorer works more for less. If this article isn't an apparent reflection of this situation, then I suspect that there are people with serious comprehension problem.

The fallacy where the rich have had people believing, that working harder will make you richer, is only a mean to rip off the foolish peasants. The truth is that a person born rich and a person born poor definately does not even have anything remotely close to an equal footing. Education definately does not level the playing field, claiming so is just part of the scam.

作者: Lik 時間: 2010-7-26 21:48

In the past when there were more social equality and more social mobility, education is a means to level the playing field. As the great divide between the rich and the poor gets bigger, however, education alone is continually becoming less effective at leveling the playing field b/c the discrepancy in available resources is making too much of a difference.

On the other hand, this Ms. Wong who blows her life savings of $300k on her wedding is extremely stupid though.

-Lik

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2010-7-27 08:06

回復快樂牛郎

Can't really believe a capitalist like you would think so highly of the government, that you'd believe most of bash against government are rootless and only a mean to avoid responsibility.
BiscottiGelato 發表於 2010/7/26 21:31

Nope, I absolutely hate all forms of governments. But I believe anyone who is competitive can strive to thrive in any environment.

Education doesn't bridge the difference between who were born extremely rich and those who weren't. But at least within the same social class, everybody gets a chance to succeed.

Looking at that guy who worked 17 hours a day, I am wondering if he did put 17 hours into his studying when he was young?

作者: KittyLeung74 時間: 2010-7-27 09:12

【明報專訊】「結婚，債務雪球就滾動起來。」30歲出頭的王小姐慨嘆，婚前和伴侶辛苦儲得30萬元，全用在婚禮 ...
快樂牛郎發表於 2010-7-25 18:51

問題關鍵在於priority,買摟/婚禮/擺酒????同埋面子/長輩/生活/健康??
王小姐將健康,時間&精神放在最後,無計!
反思一下,盛大婚禮,靚衫美食的一天,換來長輩高興,有面子,有美好回億,親朋戚友的恭喜掌聲, so wonderful....
背後是健康差,債務纏身....甚至感情減退....
值不值得,問心?
如果為一天的豪華,付出健康,日捱夜捱,甚至猝死,試問長輩會開心嗎?親朋戚友會高興嗎?
送完禮金再送帛金,好嗎?去完婚禮再去喪禮,好嗎?
選擇在每一個人手上,想清楚生命的priority?

作者: Icebaby 時間: 2010-7-27 09:38

問題關鍵在於priority,買摟/婚禮/擺酒????同埋面子/長輩/生活/健康??
王小姐將健康,時間&精神放在最後,無 ...
KittyLeung74 發表於 2010-7-27 09:12

well said Kitty, applause

作者: Icebaby 時間: 2010-7-27 09:41

what is the point making so much $?
godavid 發表於 2010-7-26 20:49

WHAT? you think $1.1k is SO MUCH $?????

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2010-7-27 09:54

送完禮金再送帛金,好嗎?去完婚禮再去喪禮,好嗎?
KittyLeung74 發表於 2010/7/27 09:12

Haha, this is so funny

作者: Icebaby 時間: 2010-7-27 10:00

Haha, this is so funny
快樂牛郎發表於 2010-7-27 09:54

and it sucks, haha... you are the one give always and won't get anything back, LOL~

作者: ricrick 時間: 2010-7-27 12:09

WHAT? you think $1.1k is SO MUCH $?????
Icebaby 發表於 2010-7-27 09:41

u know.. tif is making $0.. comparing 0 to 11k.. that's so much

作者: Icebaby 時間: 2010-7-27 13:49

u know.. tif is making $0.. comparing 0 to 11k.. that's so much
ricrick 發表於 2010-7-27 12:09

oic

作者: godavid 時間: 2010-7-27 22:05

why do you need to make up to that amount of salary?

作者: Davidcopperfeel 時間: 2010-7-29 02:56

poor kid but regardless thats his choice.

歡迎光臨溫哥華老友記討論區 (http://www.loyaukee.com/forum/)