溫哥華老友記討論區 - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: 中央社：愈強大中國愈咄咄逼人？ [打印本頁]

作者: Lik 時間: 2010-8-12 13:57 標題: 中央社：愈強大中國愈咄咄逼人？

http://news.sina.com.tw/article/20100812/3625113.html

愈強大中國愈咄咄逼人？
中央社 (2010-08-12 12:34)

（中央社台北2010年8月12日電）中國國家實力逐漸增強，大陸學者最近發表文章稱，中國變得愈來愈咄咄逼人，經濟發展與經濟實力增強帶來的信心，正轉變為國家的傲慢。

包括中央電視台英語頻道主持人楊銳在內的多名學者最近在新華社旗下的國際先驅導發表文章說，中國的自信正在向自負轉變。

文章說，中國變得不謙虛、不容忍，且自以為是。

學者認為，中國經濟發展和經濟實力增強帶來的信心正在轉變成國家的傲慢。文章並質疑：是世界在誤讀中國，還是中國在誤讀世界？根本問題在於中國自稱的所謂獨特性。

中國正在迅速發生變化，目前已成為僅次於美國的世界第二大經濟體，擁有約2.5兆美元最大外匯存底。

在國家實力增強的同時，中國在許多國家眼中變得咄咄逼人，無論在氣候變化問題、還是在南中國海的爭端方面，中國都表現出逼人態勢。

中國國內的民族主義情緒也不斷高漲，特別是在北京奧運會後，不斷有如「中國不高興」的言論發表。在全球金融危機後，許多中國人說中國拯救全世界。

文章說，中國一直有韜光養晦的傳統，但現在這種低調的傳統似乎正在被放棄。

學者在文章中說，在中國變得愈來愈咄咄逼人之際，國家媒體也喜歡採用激烈的言辭，這些都會誤導或者毒害中國民眾。

文章指出，中國強勁的經濟成長給中國人帶來空前的信心，讓民眾變得愈來愈傲慢和自以為是。在物質主義越來越嚴重的中國社會，需要找回失落的靈魂。

作者: Lik 時間: 2010-8-12 14:00

雖然係中央社（臺灣嘅國家通訊社）發表嘅文章，但內容我亦覺得大致無講錯。特別係以下嘅呢兩句：

中國一直有韜光養晦的傳統，但現在這種低調的傳統似乎正在被放棄。
在物質主義越來越嚴重的中國社會，需要找回失落的靈魂。

唉...

-力

作者: samsung 時間: 2010-8-12 14:10

I'm not surprised... not to mention a nationality, even a person, when he becomes rich and strong, he would be 咄咄逼人 as well, it's nothing wrong.. very soon China will lead the world, China is not the same China any more, kid...

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2010-8-12 14:11

arrogance is not a bad thing

作者: Prelude 時間: 2010-8-12 14:11

I feel China is always the same, not much difference.
But I do feel China does show more of their power status when there is a conflict in the politic level.
Either way, it's still much better than US, US is the most 不謙虛、不容忍，且自以為是 country as of right now.

作者: peter236 時間: 2010-8-12 14:14

本帖最後由 peter236 於 2010-8-12 14:16 編輯

This is very good for China, to stand up against the US and British bullies.
Little moron Lik, this is not the Ching dynasty. You British empire is no longer what it was.

作者: fibbi 時間: 2010-8-12 14:22

愈強大中國愈咄咄逼人？
中央社 (2010-08-12 12:34)

（中央社台北2010年8月12日電）在國家實力增強的同時，中國在許多國家眼中變得咄咄逼人，無論在氣候變化問題、還是在南中國海的爭端方面，中國都表現出逼人態勢。
Lik 發表於 2010-8-12 13:57

That depends, what happened to 釣魚台?

作者: samsung 時間: 2010-8-12 14:44

Is Aaron Kwok the same Aaron Kwok before he comes a super star? Is 成龍 the same 成龍 before he is a 大哥﹖

China should definitely 發揮 her 影響力 if she becomes powerful and govern the world financially... I think it's like a home, when father is the only money earner, he speaks louder, but if your mother works too, they would have almost the same "say"... when you go out to work, you start to have some 'say" in the family, right?

作者: daimo 時間: 2010-8-12 14:55

the original article:

国际先驱导报 (新華社)

http://new.21ccom.net/articles/q ... _2010081115427.html

作者: Lik 時間: 2010-8-12 15:27

That depends, what happened to 釣魚台?
fibbi 發表於 2010-8-12 14:22

Exactly. China is simply one of the most (if not the most) capitalistic countries in the world right now. If there is no economic incentive for certain actions, they would never do it. If the economic incentives outweight political incentives, they would still proceed with whatever the economic incentives dictate. (This is the case with 釣魚台.)

-Lik

作者: Lik 時間: 2010-8-12 15:30

But I do feel China does show more of their power status when there is a conflict in the politic level.
Either way, it's still much better than US, US is the most 不謙虛、不容忍，且自以為是 country as of right now.
Prelude 發表於 2010-8-12 14:11

Try asking people in Africa about this, and you may very well get a totally different answer. The Chinese empire is acting no differently than how the British and American empires have done in simply sucking out the resources of the poorer nations.

-Lik

作者: peter236 時間: 2010-8-12 15:32

Exactly. China is simply one of the most (if not the most) capitalistic countries in the world righ ...
Lik 發表於 2010-8-12 15:27

The issue with Diaoyu islands is that is it supposed to be under Taiwan province. Any unilateral moves by mainland China will be used as an excuse for protest by the Green camp. As the relations with Taiwan improves, there will be joint military moves from mainland China and Taiwan province to take back Diaoyu island from those perverted Japanese.

作者: lo_pak 時間: 2010-8-12 19:54

China needs not only let portion of the population get rich, everyone needs to get rich...

歡迎光臨溫哥華老友記討論區 (http://www.loyaukee.com/forum/)