溫哥華老友記討論區 - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: Lift off for China's second lunar probe [打印本頁]

作者: peter236 時間: 2010-10-1 22:56 標題: Lift off for China's second lunar probe

[youtube]yzuBZc95LaE[/youtube]

作者: tiffiant 時間: 2010-10-1 23:54

good, china is getting new technology

作者: mukmuk2 時間: 2010-10-2 00:01

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: kingkong123 時間: 2010-10-2 08:04

浪费钱

给钱给D没书读的细路好过啦，搞埋晒人地美国佬几十年前做过的野，低能

作者: lo_pak 時間: 2010-10-2 10:13

本帖最後由 lo_pak 於 2010-10-2 10:15 編輯

回復 4# kingkong123

Not quite, there's way more new stuffs to work on exploring the moon. I will only use the word "lucky" to conclude the US last lunar mission.

But, like you propose, I agree that the China government should input more resources on education.

作者: soli 時間: 2010-10-2 12:23

浪费钱

给钱给D没书读的细路好过啦，搞埋晒人地美国佬几十年前做过的野，低能 ...
kingkong123 發表於 2010-10-2 08:04

舊年中國有600萬大學畢業生﹐大陸正為這批畢業生就業傷腦筋。
教育要配合經濟發展﹐否則資源會被浪費。
西方國家很多年輕人畢業=失業 or 做唔到本行要從頭學起﹐就係過度投資教育既結果。

作者: Lik 時間: 2010-10-2 13:17

The purposes of education is to develop rational and independent thinking, and the ability to think rationally and independently is what drives society forward. Education is not to meant to merely train somebody up just for jobs.

Of course, rational, independent thinking is precisely the thing CPC does not want to see among its citizens.

-Lik

作者: rockypath 時間: 2010-10-2 15:00

浪费钱

给钱给D没书读的细路好过啦，搞埋晒人地美国佬几十年前做过的野，低能 ...
kingkong123 發表於 2010-10-2 08:04

Are you a member of 法輪功? If you are not, I can only say you are ignorant and 鼠目寸光.

Don't try to debate with me since it will be an embarassemet to you. I would suggest you use the effort to educate yourself.

作者: kingkong123 時間: 2010-10-2 15:39

Are you a member of 法輪功? If you are not, I can only say you are ignorant and 鼠目寸光.

Don't t ...
rockypath 發表於 2010-10-2 15:00

收皮啦你，就你D 低能水平debate你简直就是易如反掌啦

在这个论坛到，你话有没人会支持你的观点啊，细路。成日意淫没用的，拿D实际野出来

作者: kingkong123 時間: 2010-10-2 15:44

舊年中國有600萬大學畢業生﹐大陸正為這批畢業生就業傷腦筋。
教育要配合經濟發展﹐否則資源會被浪費。
...
soli 發表於 2010-10-2 12:23

你讲出D甘的说话就证明你唔了解中国

中国投资教育难道系过度吗？中国投资教育的资金在GDP中系极低的，在世界排名也非常靠后

中国造成大学生失业是因为教育产业化，对教育的不重视造成，并非中国政府投资教育多

知道什么叫教育产业化吗？

作者: rockypath 時間: 2010-10-2 17:00

收皮啦你，就你D 低能水平debate你简直就是易如反掌啦

在这个论坛到，你话有没人会支持你的观点啊 ...
kingkong123 發表於 2010-10-2 15:39

Developing 航天技術 and funding education are two separated topics. It is you try to mix these two topics together and confuse people.

Now, could you tell us why other countries also heavily invest in航天技術 including India which having trouble to feed its own people? Is because they have too much money to spend?

Do you have the gut to face me and answer my question directly?

作者: soli 時間: 2010-10-2 17:13

你讲出D甘的说话就证明你唔了解中国

中国投资教育难道系过度吗？中国投资教育的资金在GDP中系极低的， ...
kingkong123 發表於 2010-10-2 15:44

大陸財政收入佔GDP百分比原本就係偏低﹐你用GDP比重黎比根本就係無聊﹐又或者係受到西方或反中既學者/傳媒誤導﹐人云亦云。(呢D就係無獨立思考既結果﹐讀幾多書都無用)

大陸教育產業化係學美國既﹐而中國現在大學生失業率仍然係好低﹐失業率高既係西方國家﹐include加拿大。

我以前睇過某經濟報告﹐話大概大陸每增長1%GDP 就夠容納100萬大學畢業生﹐所以現在問題仲未出現。
過幾年大陸經濟增長放緩或者大學生年出產破千萬既時候就唔知會點啦。

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2010-10-2 17:35

but 大學生 is just a name, it doesn't mean they possess the skills a graduate should have. If they lower the bar enough, everyone could become a 大學生.

作者: mukmuk2 時間: 2010-10-2 20:30

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: kingkong123 時間: 2010-10-2 20:30

大陸財政收入佔GDP百分比原本就係偏低﹐你用GDP比重黎比根本就係無聊﹐又或者係受到西方或反中既學者/傳媒 ...
soli 發表於 2010-10-2 17:13

哈哈哈哈哈，你讲得没错，中国系没失业的，中国只有下岗姐

你讲野九唔搭八，增加教育拨款就一定多大学生吗？你有没文化噶，增加教育拨款系给山区穷乡僻壤的孩子有书读，有饭吃
你了解多D 大陆先出来发声啦，你越发表你的意见越暴露你对中国了解甚少

作者: kingkong123 時間: 2010-10-2 20:37

Developing 航天技術 and funding education are two separated topics. It is you try to mix these two ...
rockypath 發表於 2010-10-2 17:00

阿差一样系错咯，唔同人地做错你中国就要跟吗？讲来讲去阿差搞航天技术你就要跟啊嘛，除左阿差你有嚒春例子啊？

作者: mukmuk2 時間: 2010-10-2 20:37

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: sheep 時間: 2010-10-2 20:58

舊年中國有600萬大學畢業生﹐大陸正為這批畢業生就業傷腦筋
...
soli 發表於 2010-10-2 12:23

話你七下七吓就真係無錯
六百萬畢業
請哂去教書就乜都解決啦

作者: kingkong123 時間: 2010-10-2 21:53

話你七下七吓就真係無錯
六百萬畢業
請哂去教書就乜都解決啦
sheep 發表於 2010-10-2 20:58

你的Idea 非常好啊

其实中国政府贪少个十分一现在的程度，足以拯救所有没书读，没饭吃的小孩

并间接使在温哥华买唔起楼的年轻人有机会买楼添

作者: rockypath 時間: 2010-10-2 22:50

阿差一样系错咯，唔同人地做错你中国就要跟吗？讲来讲去阿差搞航天技术你就要跟啊嘛，除左阿差你有 ...
kingkong123 發表於 2010-10-2 20:37

OK, if you think India is stupid. What about US, Russian, France, Japan, South Korea? Do you want me to continue the list?

Are those people all stupid except you? When you say all people around you are 傻仔 but all of them say you are 傻仔, who will be more likely to be the real 傻仔? Should it more likely be you or the people around you?

Dare to answer my question?

作者: sheep 時間: 2010-10-2 23:10

if you think India is stupid. What about US, Russian, France, Japan, South Korea? Do you want me to continue the list?
rockypath 發表於 2010-10-2 22:50

你真係好可愛

作者: rockypath 時間: 2010-10-2 23:17

你真係好可愛
sheep 發表於 2010-10-2 23:10

你真係好天真好傻

作者: kingkong123 時間: 2010-10-3 07:54

本帖最後由 kingkong123 於 2010-10-3 07:59 編輯

OK, if you think India is stupid. What about US, Russian, France, Japan, South Korea? Do you want ...
rockypath 發表於 2010-10-2 22:50

我几时都dara anwser 你D question啦

其他国家没你中国甘多没书读的细路，没饭吃的细路，贪污甘严重的程度

如果过每个细路都有书读，唔使在矿井里头做童工，有米落肚， D官员可以开少D 用纳税人的钱买 Audi。 ok啊发展航天技术系好事啊，我举双手双脚赞成。但是做唔到上面最基本的民生基础，搞D 无谓的航天技术都系没意义的垃圾

一个简单的道理，你屋企都有人辛辛苦苦甘去洗大饼，周身伤痛，你会唔会去买只几十卡的钻石用来演野？

你讲的俄罗斯，韩国，日本有边一个国家好似中国甘多无书读，没饭吃的小孩？

我又challege 你了，你又 Dare 唔 dare 回答我为题啊？

作者: kingkong123 時間: 2010-10-3 08:03

你真係好可愛
sheep 發表於 2010-10-2 23:10

应该讲他好天真烂漫

因为他唔知道什么叫贫穷，什么叫苦，他在大陆生活过几久啊，如果了解大陆的人点会给我challenge 他一栋都没啊，种问我 dare 唔 dare回答他问题，哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈

笑左我成晚，牙铰都甩埋

作者: sheep 時間: 2010-10-3 08:05

呢個回合
Kingkong123 勝

作者: sheep 時間: 2010-10-3 08:16

应该讲他好天真烂漫

因为他唔知道什么叫贫穷，什么叫苦，他在大陆生活过几久啊，如果了解大陆的人 ...
kingkong123 發表於 2010-10-3 08:03

石仔拖著佢老豆隻手
講
爹哋
嗰啲同我咁大嘅小朋友
點解唔使番學嘅？

佢老豆就話
佢哋嗰老豆拎咗啲錢去做火箭
第二日上月球搵嫦娥

石仔就話
爹哋爹哋
我又要好似佢哋咁
唔讀書上太空

佢老豆就話
.............

作者: Lik 時間: 2010-10-3 11:32

KingKong哥你實在講得太好～連環不停KO晒果幾個低能仔～

-力

作者: somewhereintime 時間: 2010-10-3 12:49

回復 17# mukmuk2

Most of the countries, if not all of them, use space exploration project to
cover up their star war weapon projects.
Do we really need to spend the fund to learn more about the cosmo
while we still know so little about our own earth? i.e. ocean and
the earth core.

作者: mukmuk2 時間: 2010-10-3 12:52

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: sheep 時間: 2010-10-3 15:09

回復 29# mukmuk2

don't forget soli

作者: rockypath 時間: 2010-10-3 16:12

我几时都dara anwser 你D question啦

其他国家没你中国甘多没书读的细路，没饭吃的细路，贪污甘严重的 ...
kingkong123 發表於 2010-10-3 07:54

It is such a pain to discuss a serious topic with an ignorant like you.

First, you still do not dare to answer my question directly – why do other countries such as the rich like US, France and Japan or the poor like India all invest heavily in developing 航天技術 if they are not stupid? There are must be a reason for them to do so as a country.

Second, do you agree that technology is a critical and indispensable foundation and cornerstone for a country to survive, develop and prosper? So, what is the driving force for the countries to establish and develop their own technologies? How will they be able to do so? Have you ever though about it?

Third, do you agree there are more children in China able to receive education now than 20 or 30 years ago? Could you tell me the reason why? If China still keeps selling their labour and natural resources (i.e. 稀土) at dirt price, can the economy of China still keep growing into the future? Will the children in China continue to receive funding for their education?

Get all the collective minds of your group and try to debate with me and I will teach you how ignorant can embarrass yourself.

作者: Lik 時間: 2010-10-3 16:31

你胡仔上腦就胡仔上腦啦～阿爺話一句「科學發展觀」你就跟佢屁跟個十足。你基本啲民生野都仲係千瘡百孔，又去咩學人哋搞最高嘅航天科技？

以前自己國家積弱俾人蝦，咁就勉強都話得通要核子而唔要褲子。家吓國力話晒都有返咁上下，要耍手段嘅話根本就無需要做啲咁嘅尖端科技／軍備野。

講到尾咪又係死要面同要搞啲大 project 出來啲官先至可以掠到水？

-力

作者: rockypath 時間: 2010-10-3 16:35

回復 32# Lik

Why do you not dare to answer my qustion directly?

What is the reason that other countries both the rich and the poor all invest in the development of space technologies?

作者: sheep 時間: 2010-10-3 20:07

回復 33# rockypath

我又要好似佢哋咁
唔讀書上太空

作者: rockypath 時間: 2010-10-3 20:21

回復 34# sheep

Dare to face me and answer my question directly?

作者: sheep 時間: 2010-10-3 20:24

回復 sheep

Dare to face me and answer my question directly?
rockypath 發表於 2010-10-3 20:21

挑
你資質愚鈍
點極都唔明
淨係識問點解

作者: rockypath 時間: 2010-10-3 20:30

挑
你資質愚鈍
點極都唔明
淨係識問點解
sheep 發表於 2010-10-3 20:24

If you do not dare to face me, then shut up and watch how I have fun with your other friends of the idiot camp.

作者: sheep 時間: 2010-10-3 20:42

If you do not dare to face me, then shut up and watch how I have fun with your other friends of th ...
rockypath 發表於 2010-10-3 20:30

I can only see your frustration and absolutely no fun at all.
I enjoy seeing you behave like a kid

"係我講先嘅
你答咗我先啦
你唔答我就唔話你點錯"

作者: sheep 時間: 2010-10-3 20:43

very funny

作者: rockypath 時間: 2010-10-3 20:46

回復 38# sheep

As usual, I won’t expect there is anything meaningful that can spit out from your mouth.

I just wonder why the King Kong has not said anything. Cannot wait to have fun with him.

作者: sheep 時間: 2010-10-3 20:50

回復 sheep

As usual, I won’t expect there is anything meaningful that can spit out from your mou ...
rockypath 發表於 2010-10-3 20:46

What can I say to a meaningless kid like you

作者: kingkong123 時間: 2010-10-3 20:54

It is such a pain to discuss a serious topic with an ignorant like you.

First, you still do not ...
rockypath 發表於 2010-10-3 16:12

几时都dare 回答你拉，那。。。学野啦，代钱落你带啊

第一，美国佬，法国佬，日本仔发展航天技术基于社会稳定，人人有饭吃，有书读的基础上发展ok 没问题，解决了最基本的社会问题，当然赞成往前走更进一步。印度的医疗体系是全民医保，虽然落后但是唔会出D先给钱后救人的事。印度全民受教育的程度比中国普及，因此出现大量IT人才。印度发展航天技术是阿差的事，我也无权反对。不过你讲来讲去就得个印度，你都几闷下

第二，科技系种要，但是基础教育更加系基石，中国搞左甘久航天技术，请问中国有哪几项科技研究系突出的，近年出左几多个世界级科学人才。以前的世界出名的中国科学家个个都是留洋翻来的，但是现在中国能出几多个世界级的科学人才？连一个小小的香港都不如，香港出的科学人才比中国更走世界。我相信一个国家能发展科技是始于基础教育和诚实的教育体系，不是浮夸的搞高科技，没学行先学走。看看中国的体育界就是一个写照，体育为拿奖牌，为面子，完全扭曲体育的真正意义。中国体操界浪费了多少无辜儿童的前程

第三，当然啦，现在更多的细路当然比二三十年前多人有书读，我非常同意啊。人会进步社会会发展噶嘛，好正常啊。你以前看咸书和看录影带打飞机，现在都看高清四仔打飞机啦。好正常姐。但是我觉得中国既然甘富有就应该让全部的小孩有书读，有饭吃。唔通搞航天技术先可以给到小孩吃饭有书读吗？你的思维逻辑就系错咯。更多的小孩有书读有机会好似你同我甘接受教育先会更多的出现未来的高科技人才。教育系科技发展的基础。没发展好教育就学人做搞高科技就等于闭门造车。

那又代成够水落你袋了，几时饮茶先？？

作者: sheep 時間: 2010-10-3 21:02

回復 42# kingkong123

你一CALL
就覆？

作者: kingkong123 時間: 2010-10-3 21:05

回復 kingkong123

你一CALL
就覆？
sheep 發表於 2010-10-3 21:02

甘唵撞正姐

作者: Lik 時間: 2010-10-3 21:09

几时都dare 回答你拉，那。。。学野啦，代钱落你带啊

第一，美国佬，法国佬，日本仔发展航天技术基于 ...
kingkong123 發表於 2010-10-3 20:54

呵呵，石仔路又俾金剛大哥KO咗喇～

-力

作者: sheep 時間: 2010-10-3 21:15

回復 35# rockypath

講個你呢世都諗唔倒嘅野你聽啦
知唔知點解你祖國射火箭會被人隊丫？
就係因為佢搞吋個市

人人射野上太空都收番筆嘅

你祖國同人射野上去就賣大包
斷人哋嘅米路
唔比人隊就奇

袋錢落你袋都冇用
你個袋細
裝唔到
瀉番哂出來

呢啲係叫徙料

作者: sheep 時間: 2010-10-3 21:26

回復 45# Lik

又去咗閉關

作者: rockypath 時間: 2010-10-3 21:34

回復 42# kingkong123

Ok, I accept your saying that India is stupid enough to spend the money that they do not have on space technology.

What about US and Japan? Is it because they have too much money so they enjoy wasting billions after billions tax payer's money? why do they not spend this money to eliminate the poverty problem of their own?

Do not run away and I still want to have fun with you.

作者: sheep 時間: 2010-10-3 21:41

回復 kingkong123
Do not run away and I still want to have fun with you.
rockypath 發表於 2010-10-3 21:34

唔怪得
啲弱智嘅
成日會笑嘅

作者: rockypath 時間: 2010-10-3 21:50

唔怪得
啲弱智嘅
成日會笑嘅
sheep 發表於 2010-10-3 21:41

Shut up la. 左著晒你個金剛哥講野.

作者: sheep 時間: 2010-10-3 21:55

回復 50# rockypath

哎呀
你好嬲呀？
我無阻金剛哥
只係你要用盡全力去應付金剛哥
你應付唔到我嗟

作者: sheep 時間: 2010-10-3 21:57

本帖最後由 sheep 於 2010-10-3 21:59 編輯

回復 50# rockypath

呵欠 ZZZZZZZ

作者: kingkong123 時間: 2010-10-3 22:12

本帖最後由 kingkong123 於 2010-10-3 22:16 編輯

回復 kingkong123

Ok, I accept your saying that India is stupid enough to spend the money that the ...
rockypath 發表於 2010-10-3 21:34

哎呀。。。救命啊，你的理解能力甘差噶

都话人地美国佬，法国佬，日本仔没有细路没饭吃，没书读，没瓦遮头，唔会有童工在矿井里头做奴隶，当然花钱可以搞航天技术啦，你

同一个比喻要打几多次你先明啊，你屋企人洗大饼，搵两餐有周身病痛，你会唔会傻到去买几卡钻石来演野啊？甘简单的道理你都唔明白吗？我已经降低自己level好几级同你解释了啵，甘通俗都唔明啊

作者: Lik 時間: 2010-10-3 22:13

回復 kingkong123

Ok, I accept your saying that India is stupid enough to spend the money that the ...
rockypath 發表於 2010-10-3 21:34

俾人駁到正一正，自己斷到應一應就唯有借啲咦將自己嘅笨實輕輕帶過～本來我都唔想咁易就放過你㗎喇，但係我呢排真係周身都唔得閒，無咁多時間來徙響你呢啲廢柴身上。

都係繼續吹吓BB同各位大佬打氣，繼續一路食花生、一路睇你同你啲 friend 點樣俾人 KO～

-力

作者: rockypath 時間: 2010-10-3 22:14

回復 rockypath

哎呀
你好嬲呀？
我無阻金剛哥
只係你要用盡全力去應付金剛哥
你應付唔到我嗟 ...
sheep 發表於 2010-10-3 21:55

我係中意玩你個金剛哥，你好嬲啊？

作者: kingkong123 時間: 2010-10-3 22:19

我係中意玩你個金剛哥，你好嬲啊？
rockypath 發表於 2010-10-3 22:14

学唔少野黎代甘多钱落你袋，几时请饮茶先

作者: peter236 時間: 2010-10-3 22:23

学唔少野黎代甘多钱落你袋，几时请饮茶先
kingkong123 發表於 2010-10-3 22:19

Just rubbish from you, hahaha.

作者: soli 時間: 2010-10-3 22:25

哈哈哈哈哈，你讲得没错，中国系没失业的，中国只有下岗姐

你讲野九唔搭八，增加教育拨款就一 ...
kingkong123 發表於 2010-10-2 20:30

咩叫下崗都唔知﹐已為下崗=失業﹐o甘無知點溝通呀?

教你辯論啦﹐講野前最好有數據support﹐你知道大陸現在識字率係幾多嗎?
山區細路都唔係無書讀﹐係環境差+遠。

作者: kingkong123 時間: 2010-10-3 22:26

Just rubbish from you, hahaha.
peter236 發表於 2010-10-3 22:23

你条契弟终于铺头啦

作者: kingkong123 時間: 2010-10-3 22:34

本帖最後由 kingkong123 於 2010-10-3 22:41 編輯

咩叫下崗都唔知﹐已為下崗=失業﹐o甘無知點溝通呀?
教你辯論啦﹐講野前最好有數據support﹐你知道大陸 ...
soli 發表於 2010-10-3 22:25

你话山区的细路唔系没书读，你真系唔惊给雷劈啊，甘的说话都讲得出口，写个服字给你

哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈，下岗唔等于失业，证明你没脑到贴地

你知道下岗的典故怎样来吗？

想当年朱镕基搞经济改革，推卸社会责任，减轻所为的国有企业负担，让国有企业自负盈亏，加强竞争力。企业就必须从剩余生产力入手，裁员。为不让社会造成恐慌或在国际社会造成不良影响，挽回面子，所以避开失业这个词，下岗这个名词由此而诞生

下岗顾名思义就是退下工作岗位，国家给你一笔遣散费，将你的工龄买断，你自己就从此自谋出路另寻其他工作“岗位”

又代钱落你个袋啦

作者: rockypath 時間: 2010-10-3 22:38

哎呀。。。救命啊，你的理解能力甘差噶

都话人地美国佬，法国佬，日本仔没有细路没饭吃，没书读，没瓦遮 ...
kingkong123 發表於 2010-10-3 22:12

Do you have trouble to understand what I ask?

Why do US and Japan not use billions after billions of tax payers’ money to eliminate the problem of poverty instead of wasting on the development of space technologies?

呢Ｄ係唔係惘顧民生？

作者: soli 時間: 2010-10-3 22:46

几时都dare 回答你拉，那。。。学野啦，代钱落你带啊

第一，美国佬，法国佬，日本仔发展航天技术基于 ...
kingkong123 發表於 2010-10-3 20:54

首先﹐你唔識印度勸你唔好亂吹﹐等陣人地般D數據出黎﹐你咪又出醜~ 代錢落你袋啦

科技發展係每個大國既必要項目﹐如果唔發展高科技﹐無野俾人做﹐點留住人才﹐教育出黎既人才唔通要輸去外國? 你係唔係白痴架?

中國自己無高科技產業既話﹐點培育世界頂級科學人才? 唔通響學校讀幾年書就變世界級科技人才? 你係唔係白痴呀?

發展航天科技其實亦即係發戰軍事技術(導彈技術)。即係波音公司可以整民航機又可以整戰鬥機﹐一樣野可以幾用。現在美日聯手圍攻中國﹐中國要唔要發展軍事科技﹐整多幾支精準導彈黎抗衡呀?
唔通你仲想要大陸用人海戰術? 你係唔係白痴呀?

作者: rockypath 時間: 2010-10-3 22:46

俾人駁到正一正，自己斷到應一應就唯有借啲咦將自己嘅笨實輕輕帶過～本來我都唔想咁易就放過你㗎喇，但係 ...
Lik 發表於 2010-10-3 22:13

I will reserve a seat for you.

KO me? Yeah, I wish you and your friends have the ability to do so. Have you ever been able to challenged me?

作者: rockypath 時間: 2010-10-3 22:48

本帖最後由 rockypath 於 2010-10-3 22:54 編輯

回復 62# soli

Let me play with KingKong la. I haven't had enough fun with him.

你插得錦勁，會唔會沒得繼續玩？

作者: soli 時間: 2010-10-3 22:48

你话山区的细路唔系没书读，你真系唔惊给雷劈啊，甘的说话都讲得出口，写个服字给你

哈哈哈哈哈哈 ...
kingkong123 發表於 2010-10-3 22:34

剛剛畢業找唔到工叫做下崗工人﹐真係想知你有無讀過小學。
你係咪就係個D山區小孩呀?

作者: kingkong123 時間: 2010-10-3 22:53

Do you have trouble to understand what I ask?

Why do US and Japan not use billions after billions ...
rockypath 發表於 2010-10-3 22:38

美国，日本，法国的poverty的定义同中国的定义天差地别

因为美国佬，日本仔，法国佬解决了基本民生问题咯，我没反对搞航天技术哦，如果过你可以给所有细路有书读，有饭吃，有瓦遮头，ok go ahead，人地美国佬，日本仔，法国佬就解决左呢d问题了，你中国得吗？

作者: rockypath 時間: 2010-10-3 23:00

本帖最後由 rockypath 於 2010-10-3 23:01 編輯

美国，日本，法国的poverty的定义同中国的定义天差地别

因为美国佬，日本仔，法国佬解决了基本民生问题 ...
kingkong123 發表於 2010-10-3 22:53

I assume that you are saying US and Japan have no poverty and that is why they have the money to waste. Ok, I accept what you said even though it is not true.

So, why would US rather spend the money on space technologies instead of paying down its national debts?

Please don't run away. It is such a fun to play with you.

作者: kingkong123 時間: 2010-10-3 23:07

首先﹐你唔識印度勸你唔好亂吹﹐等陣人地般D數據出黎﹐你咪又出醜~ 代錢落你袋啦

科技發展係每個大國既必 ...
soli 發表於 2010-10-3 22:46

搞下个火箭就可以有高科技人才？你连个基础教育都搞到一塌糊涂，如果你系成功的点会有甘多人技术移民出来外国，任何家高科技发达国家基础教育都做得好好，美国，法国，德国，日本，万丈高楼平地起，没好的基础大楼就会倒，就好似大陆现在D楼甘豆腐一样，你甘威水你点解唔返去报效祖国啊

作者: kingkong123 時間: 2010-10-3 23:15

I assume that you are saying US and Japan have no poverty and that is why they have the money to w ...
rockypath 發表於 2010-10-3 23:00

一定play 你

美国佬的债务当然唔急住还啦，你地D人借钱给他使，唔还钱，你吹啊，最多米印多D给你

要美国佬破产？美国佬破产米等于自己破产，美国佬没所谓哦，反正有班债主垫尸底

没人话发展高科技唔好哦，只是唔同的事物用于唔同的人身上就会有唔同影响
又代钱落你带啦，这个叫相对而论，唯物主义哲学的两面性，学野啦又

作者: rockypath 時間: 2010-10-3 23:15

Soli, do you still want to educate this 白癡?

如果沒有高科技部門，只有基礎教育部門，何來培養高科技人才?

First, I don't think he understood what you said.

Second, I believe he had never attended college or university himself. So he believe college graduates are 高科技人才. How stupid.

作者: kingkong123 時間: 2010-10-3 23:18

Soli, do you still want to educate this 白癡?

如果沒有高科技部門，只有基礎教育部門，何來培養高科技 ...
rockypath 發表於 2010-10-3 23:15

没人话读大学出来就是高科技人才哦，没人话唔应该发展高科技产业哦，你唔好学共产党甘，甘中意扣人帽子哦。

如果过没好的基础教育就一定无可能有真正的高科技人才，有都是假大空

作者: soli 時間: 2010-10-3 23:22

搞下个火箭就可以有高科技人才？你连个基础教育都搞到一塌糊涂，如果你系成功的点会有甘多人技术移民出 ...
kingkong123 發表於 2010-10-3 23:07

搞火箭只係其中一樣﹐不過係你發雞盲睇唔到。
你知唔知射支火箭上太空要有幾多種相關技術既配合﹐每一項都有其專門既領域。
如果教育真係做得o甘唔好﹐支火箭就會好似印度D火箭o甘﹐平均三支跌兩支。

大陸有13億人﹐有幾多人住山區幾多人住城市﹐如果基礎教育無做好﹐何來600萬大學畢業生? D大學生無讀過小學中學?

大陸有技術既人要出國謀生﹐一部份原因正是因為中國科技落後﹐無合適同respectable既工作做俾D專才做。
所以中國在科技上正要急起直追﹐先可以留住人才﹐如果唔係就白白浪費左教育資源送去俾外國。

作者: soli 時間: 2010-10-3 23:25

回復 70# rockypath

哈哈﹐咪當做善事囉﹐條友正正係peter 仔講既self-hating chinese. 咩都諗埋一邊。

作者: rockypath 時間: 2010-10-3 23:30

一定play 你

美国佬的债务当然唔急住还啦，你地D人借钱给他使，唔还钱，你吹啊，最多米印多D给你

...
kingkong123 發表於 2010-10-3 23:15

Ok, I also accept what you said – US does not need to worry about its national debts.

So, what is your understanding of the significance of developing space technologies to countries like US and Japan which have billions and billions of tax payer’s money to waste?

Significance = 意義, in case you do not understand English.

作者: kingkong123 時間: 2010-10-3 23:32

搞火箭只係其中一樣﹐不過係你發雞盲睇唔到。
你知唔知射支火箭上太空要有幾多種相關技術既配合﹐每一項 ...
soli 發表於 2010-10-3 23:22

都唔知你向边个屎佛隆捐出来的，猪西都没人有

600万个大学生就叫搞好基础教育？这个只是一个数字，系一个量并非质，又一次证明你对停留在看报纸电视当中，话你唔了解你种博，去大陆住几年学下野啦，细路

你讲的没respectable的工作，只是一个表面症状，唔系核心问题，核心问题系社会唔公平，财富分配唔合理。看问题唔好只看问题的表面，要看问题核心，又一次证明你没做好功课又来扮狗叫

作者: kingkong123 時間: 2010-10-3 23:35

Ok, I also accept what you said – US does not need to worry about its national debts.

So, what ...
rockypath 發表於 2010-10-3 23:30

同你讲野都废的，同一问题兜兜转转

认真D睇返之前的帖啦，回答左你好久了

作者: rockypath 時間: 2010-10-3 23:35

都唔知你向边个屎佛隆捐出来的，猪西都没人有

600万个大学生就叫搞好基础教育？这个只是一个数字 ...
kingkong123 發表於 2010-10-3 23:32

Are you saying - if China does not have a perfect education system, it shall not invest in developing space technologies?

作者: kingkong123 時間: 2010-10-3 23:36

回復 rockypath

哈哈﹐咪當做善事囉﹐條友正正係peter 仔講既self-hating chinese. 咩都諗埋一邊。 ...
soli 發表於 2010-10-3 23:25

你条弱智仔又真系几中意意淫哦

作者: soli 時間: 2010-10-3 23:38

都唔知你向边个屎佛隆捐出来的，猪西都没人有

600万个大学生就叫搞好基础教育？这个只是一个数字 ...
kingkong123 發表於 2010-10-3 23:32

哈哈哈﹐要講質﹐講質就要有比較先知。你有無響加拿大既大學讀過書先?邊間呀?

突然間核心問題又變左社會問題﹐我地講緊教育同發展高科技窩﹐你係唔係腦裝水呀?

作者: kingkong123 時間: 2010-10-3 23:43

Are you saying - if China does not have a perfect education system, it shall not invest in develop ...
rockypath 發表於 2010-10-3 23:35

那那那，又来了，由学共产党D 衰野扣我帽子啊

没人话要perfect，而系在民生基础有一定保障的及基础的时候先应该投资甘多入去航天技术当中

作者: kingkong123 時間: 2010-10-3 23:46

哈哈哈﹐要講質﹐講質就要有比較先知。你有無響加拿大既大學讀過書先?邊間呀?

突然間核心問題又變左社會 ...
soli 發表於 2010-10-3 23:38

哎，你睇唔明就收皮啦，你脑装屎噶

睇你读书都是读屎片的了

已经好迁就你，降低level同你讲野，你都唔明，甘真系没办法

作者: rockypath 時間: 2010-10-3 23:46

同你讲野都废的，同一问题兜兜转转

认真D睇返之前的帖啦，回答左你好久了 ...
kingkong123 發表於 2010-10-3 23:35

You only answer the reason why those countries could invest in space technologies - it is because they have no poverty, no worry for national debts and plenty of money to waste.

What I asked now is the significance of developing space technologies to those countries.

As I already said, I just worry that you don't understand what "significance" means.

Tell you again - "significance = 意義". Get it?

Ok, any thougth to share with me?

作者: kingkong123 時間: 2010-10-3 23:54

You only answer the reason why those countries could invest in space technologies - it is because ...
rockypath 發表於 2010-10-3 23:46

没人同你争论意义这个问题，你唔好转移话题

同你讲野真系狗唔答八，

作者: kingkong123 時間: 2010-10-3 23:57

好啦

休息啦，听日在KO多几次你两条弱智仔

作者: rockypath 時間: 2010-10-4 00:11

本帖最後由 rockypath 於 2010-10-4 00:15 編輯

没人同你争论意义这个问题，你唔好转移话题

同你讲野真系狗唔答八， ...
kingkong123 發表於 2010-10-3 23:54

如果沒有意義，美國日本每年“浪費”幾百上千億美金來做什麼？白癡啊？

Don't worry, you will slowly realize what an idiot you are. No hurry.

I will let you have no way to argue for yourself.

作者: sheep 時間: 2010-10-4 06:14

如果沒有高科技部門，只有基礎教育部門，何來培養高科技人才
rockypath 發表於 2010-10-3 23:15

你數吓放洋嘅中國學生有幾多
又有幾多外國學生去中國讀書
以上不識用於讀外語的

作者: kingkong123 時間: 2010-10-4 08:12

如果沒有意義，美國日本每年“浪費”幾百上千億美金來做什麼？白癡啊？

Don't worry, you will slowly ...
rockypath 發表於 2010-10-4 00:11

讨论做一件事的意义可以倾倒天荒地老，无限放大。这就是我唔回答你个意义问题的所在，这个是没有定义，可无限度的放大，就好似我问你发展教育一样，点解全世界发达国家教育都做得比任何事都要好，放在任何事在首位一样，我举出来的国家比你区区三几个种要多啦，你倾一万年都有得你倾。

现在讲的不是发展航天的意义所在，讲的系在什么时候应该做什么事，什么应该先做，什么应该后做的争论，无人与你争论应该唔应该发展航天技术，这个其实一字甘浅非常简单，当然应该拉，我讲过当然应该啦，我举双手双脚赞成，但系系有条件有前提的。就好似买车甘，每个人其实都买得起十几二十万的车，但是有没必要在当时的情况及条件做这件事呢？这个就是问题的中心所在及争论的部分

从辩论的角度上讲你已经离题，所以我唔答你系给你个机会返回原题，给面你，你唔要，系都要我画公仔画出肠，你话你丑唔丑怪？

作者: Lik 時間: 2010-10-4 08:50

呢兩條低能仔係咁㗎啦～特別係條石仔路，無料到、俾人KO到無得駁就轉移視線，然後就辦惡來窮追話人地無答佢問題，同佢講咁多都真係多鳩餘啦～

-力

作者: rockypath 時間: 2010-10-4 08:55

本帖最後由 rockypath 於 2010-10-4 09:00 編輯

讨论做一件事的意义可以倾倒天荒地老，无限放大。这就是我唔回答你个意义问题的所在，这个是没有定 ...
kingkong123 發表於 2010-10-4 08:12

我離題？ No, No, No. I never 離題. It is actually YOU who NEVER dare to answer my question directly!

I repeat my question again – “why DO other countries such US, Japan and India heavily invest in space technologies?” = “what is the SIGNIFICANCE for other countries such as US, Japan and India heavily invest in space technologies?”

I know you don’t understand English and I restate my question in Chinese for you.

我問的是－ “為什麼其他國家如美國、日本和印度要大力投資發展航天技術？” ＝ “其他國家如美國、日本和印度大力投資發展航天技術有何意義？”

Did I state my question clear enough? Did you answer my question directly?

No! You avoided my quesiton and only answered – “why other countries such US, Japan and India COULD heavily invest in space technologies. (“為什麼其他國家如美國、日本和印度可以大力投資發展航天技術.”) .

If you don’t know the 意義, how could you know what should be done and when to be done?

DARE TO ANSWER MY QEUSTION DIRECTLY NOW?

作者: mukmuk2 時間: 2010-10-4 09:00

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: mukmuk2 時間: 2010-10-4 09:02

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: rockypath 時間: 2010-10-4 09:04

本帖最後由 rockypath 於 2010-10-4 09:07 編輯

回復 90# mukmuk2

Just answer my qustion directly.

If you do not know the reasons and significance of an issue, how do ou make your decision on - why to do it, when to do it and how to do it, or NOT to do it.

Can you tell me base on what you make decision and call your judgement?

作者: mukmuk2 時間: 2010-10-4 09:07

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: rockypath 時間: 2010-10-4 09:18

本帖最後由 rockypath 於 2010-10-4 09:24 編輯

Sorry I did not follow the entire thread so I do not know if you already stated what your decision ...
mukmuk2 發表於 2010-10-4 09:07

You fall into the trap which King Kong and moron Lik try to create - "China would rather invest in space technologies instead of education which is critical for the future of China.”

Investing in space technologies and education are two separated issues. Investing in technologies does not down play the SIGNIFICACE of education. As a country, China needs to invest in building a solid foundation for its future and this foundation has many critical components and certainly includes EDUCATION and TECHNOLOGIES. China needs to establish and develop all of those critical components but not just ONE of them.

People would easily fall into their trap since they all understand the “significance and impact of education” for the future of China, but understand less about the “significance and impact of technologies” (I am supprised moron Lik does not understand this since he claims himself a 電腦人. The school should have taught him about the social impact of technologies unless he graduated from a 野雞大學).

Just wait and I will show you the SIGNIFICANCE of technologies and why China needs to invest in space technologies. I just want to see what KingKong have to say.

作者: sheep 時間: 2010-10-4 09:23

You fall into the trap which King Kong and moron Lik try to create - "China would rather invest in ...
rockypath 發表於 2010-10-4 09:18

冥頑不靈

作者: rockypath 時間: 2010-10-4 09:24

冥頑不靈
sheep 發表於 2010-10-4 09:23

Dare to debate me?

作者: mukmuk2 時間: 2010-10-4 09:27

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: rockypath 時間: 2010-10-4 09:29

no matter what those technologies too, if no one educates those people who poo on the street, or p ...
mukmuk2 發表於 2010-10-4 09:27

Just wait and I show you the SIGNIFICANCE later and you can make your own judgement.

I just want to see what KingKong or moron Lik has to day.

作者: sheep 時間: 2010-10-4 09:33

回復 98# rockypath

debate?!
Where is your point?
I don't see any. I see only you keep asking people to answer your question.
And I see you agree on what others have said
Just like you say,I am waiting for what you are going to say.

作者: rockypath 時間: 2010-10-4 09:36

回復 rockypath

Just like you say,I am waiting for what you are going to say.
sheep 發表於 2010-10-4 09:33

I told you to shut up and wait. It is you who cannot control your own mouth.

歡迎光臨溫哥華老友記討論區 (http://www.loyaukee.com/forum/)