溫哥華老友記討論區 - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: 「派糖」兼顧抗通脹精益求精考智慧 [打印本頁]

作者: rockypath 時間: 2011-2-26 15:51 標題: 「派糖」兼顧抗通脹精益求精考智慧

本帖最後由 rockypath 於 2011-2-26 16:02 編輯

Lik and his fellows. This is an article worth your guys' reading. It is good that it mentioned about Singapore and some economic knowledge (which I had told you) as well.

Lik, you still haven't answered my question about your "nice meal policy" - how would the "economic multiplier effect" benefit and help the poor?

=========================================================

「派糖」兼顧抗通脹精益求精考智慧
[2011-02-24]
Share

香港最新《預算案》推出多項回饋措施，力度超過四百億元，當中以注資入市民強積金戶口最大手筆。當局不採用退稅的方式還富於納稅人，解釋是此舉令得益人數大增，同時為免通脹火上加油。然而，對於財爺的設計，香港很多市民坦言不領情。香港通脹威脅未除，香港政府採取「曲線派錢」的做法防患未然時，不妨考慮有沒有其他方法，可以令措施更受市民歡迎。
香港財政司司長曾俊華二十三日公布新一年《預算案》，由於幾個月來大家已經預計港府本財政年度盈餘會超過七百億元，要求「派糖」的呼聲不絕於耳。不算入一些為社會發展作長遠投資的撥款，這份《預算案》幾乎把用過的「派糖」招數盡出，惟獨就是沒有退稅。

不管新招舊招，市民受惠就是好招。但是，近年市民對港府派糖紓困已經習以為常，沒有新招激發「驚喜」效果並非首要，反而當中拒絕退稅，與大多數納稅人的期望出現落差。

退稅比注資強積金較容易博取市民掌聲，原因是大家覺得「有錢過手」，如何運用可以自主，不必被逼儲蓄到退休後，不必受基金管理人賺去一筆。退稅令人感覺良好，部分人會因此增加消費，當通脹肆虐時就會火上加油，按經濟理論，只有通縮或溫和通脹時才適宜退稅。今年新加坡在高通脹時仍然退稅，原因是有加息和貨幣升值作為調控武器，撇開香港受制於聯匯難以主動加息，調高息口同樣會令很多人增加利息支出。
注資強積金戶口代替退稅，可以抵銷通脹副作用，代價卻是彈多讚少。面對批評，港府應研究一套「對沖」機制，日後透過一面退稅一面回收銀根，讓市民開心之餘，兼得避免通脹的效果。

通脹增加生活開支，負利率蠶食市民儲蓄，把錢趕去股市樓市，加熱經濟抬高物價。香港不少退休人士或理財保守的市民，眼巴巴看着放在銀行的辛苦積蓄購買力不斷萎縮。香港《預算案》提出發行派息與通脹掛鈎的債券，為市民提供保值途徑，同時有助香港債市多元化。現時市場利息遠低於通脹，這類「高息」債券等於香港政府變相為市民包底，還幸大手發債成本不高，所得資金有辦法藉投資跑贏存款。
當局發行官債惠民，還可以調節市面閑資，為經濟降溫，間接壓低通脹。香港《預算案》初步構思在下半年發行第一筆五十億元通脹債券，測試市民的接受程度。如果證實受歡迎，港府不妨大幅增發，還可以研究日後如何把退稅與發債掛鈎，設法令市民對還富資金用途多個選擇，錢過手後流回庫房，通脹又不致加溫。

美元及人民幣匯價不轉勢，通脹會維持一段時間，港府要在財政政策上抗擊，就要不斷研究優化措施。除了抗通脹債券，其他建議如交通費穩定基金，意念上都有可取之處，值得為政者反覆推敲。

http://news.singtao.ca/toronto/2011-02-24/editorial1298543037d3024353.html

作者: kingkong123 時間: 2011-2-26 16:59

狗屁不通

作者: rockypath 時間: 2011-2-26 17:16

狗屁不通
kingkong123 發表於 2011-2-26 16:59

邊一處唔通？你個屎眼唔通？叫力仔幫你啦。

作者: Lik 時間: 2011-2-26 18:10

Lik and his fellows. This is an article worth your guys' reading. It is good that it mentioned abou ...
rockypath 發表於 2011-2-26 15:51

撚樣，真係想唔爆粗diu柒你都唔得...

全世界都知道，而我亦響 forum 度講咗9億幾次：香港嘅通脹係因為外來因素：講元同貶緊值嘅美金掛勾、人民幣對美金有升值壓力，而偏偏香港絕大部份嘅糧食同好多用品都係來自中國大陸，所以香港啲通脹先至咁勁。就算係派錢嘅話、就算全部使晒啲錢來買野，呢個 demand 同中國大陸嘅 supply 都係差天共地，完全無能力令個 supply-demand curve 嘅 equilibrium point 移位。呢個咁簡單嘅問題，唔需要識 econ 嘅人都諗到：試問區區一個只得700萬人嘅小香港，有無足夠嘅購買力、需求力去影響有13億人嘅大中國市場？！

從來只有中國大陸嘅人同熱錢先至有能力炒貴香港嘅野：房屋如是、奶粉如是。係你呢啲咁撚死蠢嘅戇玖擦鞋仔，為咗要舔阿爺屎眼同獻媚先至會講埋啲咁仆街又顛倒是非嘅說話。

你特衰政府一日做野抵消呢啲外來嘅通脹因素，通脹就一直都會響香港持續。香港係國際金融中心，所以唔可以限制外來資金嘅出入，所以阻止唔到中國大陸熱錢嘅流入。你係有種嘅話就同美金脫勾，咁港紙就無咗貶值嘅壓力，而通脹亦都會大大減輕。但同你一樣咁仆街嘅特衰政府（包括鬍鬚曾）就死都唔肯取消聯繫匯率㗎喇，所以會幫市民對抗通脹就只有從其他方面入手。派錢係其中一個極為可行嘅方法，因為政府絕對有呢個能力，而市民收到錢之後就會有多少彈藥去對抗外來因素而帶來嘅通脹。

同一個 point 我不吓同你條仆街講咗最少5、6、7次。你咪撚再來徙我時間。

返去舔阿爺嘅屎眼啦，賤種！

-力

作者: rockypath 時間: 2011-2-26 20:29

撚樣，真係想唔爆粗diu柒你都唔得...

全世界都知道，而我亦響 forum 度講咗9億幾次：香港嘅通脹係因為外 ...
Lik 發表於 2011-2-26 18:10

語無倫次的無知仔。真慶倖香港不是掌握在你們這幫不學無術的笨蛋手中。你知道你講的到底是什麼嗎？

正是因為香港的通脹是輸入型通脹，而香港政府可以進行干預和調控的辦法非常有限，政府在制定經濟政策時更要非常謹慎並對最壞情況的出現要有所預防。正是因為香港的通脹是外在因素決定，政府不可能對通脹的程度和嚴重度進行預測和干預，因此更不應該火上澆油。

如果發了錢，通脹沒有增加，自然是皆大歡喜。反之，如果通脹變嚴重，香港是不是可以靠阿力你打救？審慎應付是一個負責任的政府應有的態度。

順從民意發錢有多難？我可以講比你多得多的理由去支持發錢。但我相信這不符合香港人（特別是貧困家庭）的最大利益。

有膽識你就回答我的問題－以下那個方案更符合香港利益？

（１）政府利用盈餘建立長期有效計劃去降低貧富懸殊和解決社會貧困問題，針對影響民生的住房交通等有直接影響的問題對貧困家庭提供直接幫助。

（２）每家每戶各發一筆現金，個人自己修行，自己解決問題。

我等你的答復。

作者: Lik 時間: 2011-2-26 20:46

我送三個字俾你呢個回覆：假、大、空。

你呢篇廢物回覆有無任何實質嘅提議？好對唔住，無。

1）長期有效計劃去降低貧富懸殊和解決社會貧困問題，政府有無做？同你個回覆一樣：無。回歸以後如果政策唔係一直一面倒咁對大有錢佬傾斜嘅話，會搞到有今日咁嘅貧富懸殊？再者，你做得啲所謂嘅降低貧富懸殊和解決社會貧困問題嘅野出來嘅時候，有需要果班人已經餓撚死咗喇！自財政預算案推出以後，鬍鬚曾其中一樣一直俾人diu嘅野就係「遠水不能救近火」。

而且，講過9億幾次，你香港特衰政府坐擁咁大嘅儲備愛來托咩？又唔係唔夠錢來一邊派錢、一邊搞長達啲嘅扶貧計劃，點解唔可以兩樣一齊做？

2）既然你個不該特衰政府唔做野來幫助市民，咁市民咪唯有自救囉？叫你開倉派果少少錢，既公平，又唔係無，點解唔做？

成日講埋你啲垃圾歪理，去仆街啦你！

-力

作者: rockypath 時間: 2011-2-27 00:03

我送三個字俾你呢個回覆：假、大、空。

你呢篇廢物回覆有無任何實質嘅提議？好對唔住，無。

1）長期有效 ...
Lik 發表於 2011-2-26 20:46

Idiot Lik. Do you have the brain to understand what I said?

First, just answer me directly. Do you agree with what I said about the concern of inflation? Yes or No. If you do not agree, just tell us the reason why. Be a man and stand up to answer my question.

Second, since the government did not take action on either solution, why did you take “giving out cash” as the only choice instead of supporting the first proposal?

Can you tell me why the first proposal is 遠水難救近火? There are many ways it can deliver an immediate assistance to the poor and needed and have less impact on the risk of inflation. For example, government can use the surplus to provide subsidy or allowance to poor families on housing, transportation, education and health so that the assistance can be delivered to meet the exact needs of those families instead of spending on a NICE MEAL.

You are just a brainless idiot blindly follow your 癲狗教主. Get your own brain, Lik.

作者: sheep 時間: 2011-2-27 10:52

本帖最後由 sheep 於 2011-2-27 10:54 編輯

順從民意發錢有多難？我可以講比你多得多的理由去支持發錢。但我相信這不符合香港人（特別是貧困家庭）的最大利益。

rockypath 發表於 2011-2-26 20:29

正因為派錢係好易
難就難在點去解釋

[有錢派俾冇需要嘅人都唔派俾你有需要嘅人]

作者: rockypath 時間: 2011-2-27 11:05

本帖最後由 rockypath 於 2011-2-27 11:16 編輯

正因為派錢係好易
難就難在點去解釋

[有錢派俾冇需要嘅人都唔派俾你有需要嘅人] ...
sheep 發表於 2011-2-27 10:52

As I already questioned - do you guys have the brain to understand what I said?

Didn't I criticize the government did not provide enough and effective assistance to help the poor and needed to get out of the situation they are in?

The only thing I did not agree with you guys is to give out cash instead of providing direct assistance to those families in more direct and effective ways. However, that will requires the government make a bigger commitment than simply giving out cash.

Get it? What an idiot.

How many time do I still need to repeat that?

作者: sheep 時間: 2011-2-27 11:18

The only think I did not agree with you guys is to give out cash instead of providing direct assistance to those families in more direct and effective ways. However, that will requires the government make a bigger commitment than simply giving out cash.
rockypath 發表於 2011-2-27 11:05

你去同亞洗碗亞嬸講
你要錢定係要政府叫你去再培訓
等你
讀完個電腦入門
再拎張成績單同學費單
再去申請津貼
你鐘意邊樣？
我諗你肯定會沖咗個洗碗水涼

作者: rockypath 時間: 2011-2-27 11:24

你去同亞洗碗亞嬸講
你要錢定係要政府叫你去再培訓
等你
讀完個電腦入門
再拎張成績單同學費單
再 ...
sheep 發表於 2011-2-27 11:18

Just read what I said in post #7 first. Idiot.

As I already said, you guys just opened your mouth and blindly BS without reading what other people had said.

作者: sheep 時間: 2011-2-27 11:31

回復 11# rockypath

聽你話
啱啱睇完
真係笑爆嘴
我都餓死咗
你俾咩我都冇用

作者: rockypath 時間: 2011-2-27 11:36

回復 rockypath

聽你話
啱啱睇完
真係笑爆嘴
我都餓死咗
你俾咩我都冇用 ...
sheep 發表於 2011-2-27 11:31

(I have to make it in Chinese again since you idiot do not understand English)

你那麼快就餓死？連直接補助都等不及？

如果香港去年庫房虧損，那你不是要“杏加橙”？

作者: sheep 時間: 2011-2-27 11:37

(I have to make it in Chinese again since you idiot do not understand English)

你那麼快就餓死？連 ...
rockypath 發表於 2011-2-27 11:36

唔明你講咩

作者: Lik 時間: 2011-2-27 11:38

The only thing I did not agree with you guys is to give out cash instead of providing direct assistance to those families in more direct and effective ways. However, that will requires the government make a bigger commitment than simply giving out cash.
rockypath 發表於 2011-2-27 11:05

LOL~

For the poor families that are having difficulties in making ends meet, what kind of assistance can possibly be more direct than directly giving them money to alleviate their woes in daily life?

Moron~

-Lik

作者: rockypath 時間: 2011-2-27 11:43

唔明你講咩
sheep 發表於 2011-2-27 11:37

Don't get it? Ok, I make it in English.

You starve to death so quickly even cannot wait for the direct subsidy instead of cash to be delivered to your hands?

If Hong Kong government was in red last year, wouldn't your whole family has to meet in heaven (your family will surely starve to death this year).

作者: sheep 時間: 2011-2-27 11:52

回復 16# rockypath

你真係詞窮理屈就
連洗碗亞嬸都咒
唔好話有赤字
根本就冇就算有
都係一年半年
同儲備比就唔止係九牛一毛
睇野睇表面
就有你呢啲咁嘅言論

作者: rockypath 時間: 2011-2-27 12:19

LOL~

For the poor families that are having difficulties in making ends meet, what kind of assistan ...
Lik 發表於 2011-2-27 11:38

Can you tell us why “giving out cash” is a more effective way to provide assistance to the poor than direct and targeted subsidy and allowance?

Don’t be a coward Lik.

作者: Lik 時間: 2011-2-27 12:49

Do you have no fxxking idea what "having difficulties in making ends meet" mean? It means you are barely having enough money or don't have enough money to survive your daily living expenses. Perhaps you don't have enough $$ to eat 3 full meals. Perhaps you don't have enough money to keep yourself warm. Perhaps you don't have enough money to support you to even take public transit to go out and work. When you are in poverty like that, what other assistance could possibly be more helpful than directly receiving cash??? The family can direct funds to whichever item they need the most help with.

Another glaringly simple fact that I didn't think I need to mention previously because it is so obviously simple is the matter of fairness and equality. The assistance measures as outlined by the current budget proposal is inherently unfair as they are biased towards redistributing more wealth to the rich and the middle class instead of those who need the assistance the most. Additionally, every assistance / subsidy / allowance program will invariable miss out certain groups because of their selection criteria. In the current budget proposal, a group that the HK media refers to as the 5無階層 or N無階層 are left out in the cold because they don't meet the requirements to fall into any of the beneficiary group. When you give money out to every HK citizen with a valid 3-star HKID, you are NOT going to miss anyone. (I wouldn't even be completely against giving money out to those poorer HK residents that have yet to receive full HK citizenship status as long as they can prove some sort of extended residential status, or perhaps have the payout scaled relative to the number of years they have been in HK -- where 7 years of residency is needed to obtain full citizenship status).

Now of course, having fully rebutted your stupid arguments, I just know you are still gonna keep on screaming and yelling that I am somehow still missing your point, or that I am not understanding your stupid English, or that I am still somehow a stupid Coward. I wouldn't expect anything less from the likes of you though.

-Lik

作者: somewhereintime 時間: 2011-2-27 13:09

本帖最後由 somewhereintime 於 2011-2-27 13:15 編輯

Indeed it is stupid to start with,
ask the homeless people which would they prefer:
a hot meal in the icy wet evening tonight or
they are entitled to a 5 star retire home when they live to be 70?
In Vancouver, there are retire homes cost $8,000 a month, plus HST

作者: rockypath 時間: 2011-2-27 13:12

本帖最後由 rockypath 於 2011-2-27 13:24 編輯

Do you have no fxxking idea what "having difficulties in making ends meet" mean? It means you are ba ...
Lik 發表於 2011-2-27 12:49

Your arguments just base on “perhaps this and perhaps that”.

First, how would you know how the family use their cash bonus? You are already stupid enough to promote your “nice meal policy”. How would that help them ease their living burdens especially if they spend the money on one-go on a nice meal? In addition, a sudden increase in consumer spending will add the risk of inflation.

Second, direct subsidy will make sure the assistance will directly meet the end needs. In addition, it will be an on-going relief to help the families to deal with their problems.

Third, if the assistance is delivered through subsidy, the government has a way to monitor its effectiveness and is able to make adjustment or improvement in next budget year.

Last, the possibility of some people could be missed out by this method is not a critical point to defeat this method since it can be always improved to minimize this impact. And I believe the impact would be much less than your “nice meal” idea.

Have I shown your stupidity enough?

作者: rockypath 時間: 2011-2-27 13:16

Indeed it is stupid to start with,
ask the homeless people which would they prefer:
a hot meal in th ...
somewhereintime 發表於 2011-2-27 13:09

Why don't you go back to Hong Kong and fight for the homeless on this budget?

You don't even know who are the main core of the fighting team.

Stupid guy. Get your brain straight first.

作者: Lik 時間: 2011-2-27 13:46

去仆街啦你～

基層家庭有錢收嘅話，係得你先至會咁撚戇車來攞咗舊錢去食餐魚翅撈飯。稍為有腦嘅都會識得呢度攞多少來買餸、果度攞少少來買返件衫俾女女，慢慢逐啲逐啲咁來搣啦。食餐 one go meal 就 fing 晒舊錢？人地係窮，唔係好似你咁係低能㗎！

而我亦講咗9億幾次咁樣用錢法無能力令通脹加劇。你自己唔撚識、唔撚睇、唔撚認就少都唔該你咪撚講你啲廢物論述。再者，鬍鬚曾住資入強積金來派錢明益啲 fund 佬、免差餉俾有物業嘅人（而且係越多物業就得益越多），咁樣呢啲本身已經比基層市民更有能力應付通脹嘅人多咗錢就唔會加劇通脹，但基層市民將啲錢用返落社會來改善自己生活就會令通脹惡化？你呢啲乜撚野仆街邏輯來㗎？

Direct subsidy will make sure the assistance will directly meet the end needs？件鬍鬚曾自己都講到明叫你班死窮鬼有事就去搵社處求助，而唔係去搞佢、質問佢、同質疑佢個財政預算案呀！不爭嘅事實就係，特衰政府扶貧嘅 track record 極差，由金融風暴果陣減咗綜緩錢到今日一直都未加返，到加生果金要資產審查啲老人家，再到近日嘅區區果＄600嘅交津都唔肯實行雙軌制，每一件事都印證住呢個特衰政府同你一樣係幾咁仆街！靠佢啲 subsidy 來make sure 啲 assistance will directly meet the end needs？有需要嘅人餓撚死晒都未見到一個崩呀，仆街！

If the assistance is delivered through subsidy, the government has a way to monitor its effectiveness and is able to make adjustment or improvement in next budget year? 狗官思維僵化，所謂嘅 monitor 咪又係搞埋啲無敵資產審查同迫啲子女簽衰仔紙之類嘅折墮賤招？你以為我成日diu佢善財難捨、冤枉甘心係假嘅、係老屈佢嘅？

Possibility of some people could be missed out by this method is not a critical point to defeat this method since it can be always improved to minimize this impact? 如果特衰政府係公平、公正嘅話，咁香港嘅貧富懸殊就唔會係全世界第一啦！淨係單單從今次財政預算案你就可以睇到佢有無 miss 到任何人，又有無 minimize 到呢個幫助不均嘅問題。生果金同綜緩出雙糧都係每個人攞多＄4千零蚊，而攞緊綜緩嘅就接近係最弱勢、最需要緩助嘅人。但我之前都講過，fund佬今次就大有斬鑊賺到笑，有樓、有能力對抗吓通脹嘅人就越多樓越受惠。咁樣又係唔係 minimize 咗接受唔到任何幫助嘅 N無人士？有係唔係公平咁去幫助有需要嘅人？

去死啦，你條賤精！

-力

作者: rockypath 時間: 2011-2-27 14:23

送你內地一個詞－腦殘。

Do you have the brain to tell whether HK government has done its part to help the poor and which method provide a more effective way to help the poor are two different issues.

Just because the government has not done its part to help the poor, you use it as the support of your opinion?

Did you really have a degree in computer science? Did you learn about logic? Do you know what a false logic is and as well as a true logic?

How stupid.

作者: Lik 時間: 2011-2-27 14:29

LOL～

點解次次都係俾我駁到你一棟到無，然後你就借啲易唔聲唔聲咁再問其他問題來轉移視線？點解我又唔見你情理兼備、深入淺出咁講解吓你果啲所謂嘅偉論？

次次都齋問人夠唔夠薑回答你，好喇，我答咗你你又自己走頭。

成日話人無膽匪類，但真正仆街果個卻係你。

快啲返去舔阿爺屎眼啦，賤種～

-力

作者: rockypath 時間: 2011-2-27 14:38

LOL～

點解次次都係俾我駁到你一棟到無，然後你就借啲易唔聲唔聲咁再問其他問題來轉移視線？點解我又唔見 ...
Lik 發表於 2011-2-27 14:29

Just look at how you defend yourself.

Because the government did not do xxxx, therefore cash is the way to go; because the government did not do xxxx, cash is the only form of assistance to be accepted.

Were you ever able to put these two forms of assistance side by side to compare their effectiveness? No, you had not and I don't think you will.

Can you see your stupidity now? I have no expectation from you.

作者: kingkong123 時間: 2011-2-27 17:14

Just look at how you defend yourself.

Because the government did not do xxxx, therefore cash is ...
rockypath 發表於 2011-2-27 14:38

好明显你是用睾丸思考的人

作者: rockypath 時間: 2011-2-27 17:45

好明显你是用睾丸思考的人
kingkong123 發表於 2011-2-27 17:14

你連睾丸都沒有，能對你說的話有什麼要求嗎？沒有！

作者: kingkong123 時間: 2011-2-27 17:50

你連睾丸都沒有，能對你說的話有什麼要求嗎？沒有！
rockypath 發表於 2011-2-27 17:45

甘你就是承认自己用睾丸思考啦

作者: rockypath 時間: 2011-2-27 17:53

甘你就是承认自己用睾丸思考啦
kingkong123 發表於 2011-2-27 17:50

沒有睾丸的人當然以為其他人是用睾丸思考。

作者: kingkong123 時間: 2011-2-27 23:18

沒有睾丸的人當然以為其他人是用睾丸思考。
rockypath 發表於 2011-2-27 17:53

哈哈，边个没睾丸大家有目共睹啦，你仲狡辩

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2011-2-27 23:47

哈哈，边个没睾丸大家有目共睹啦，你仲狡辩
kingkong123 發表於 2011-2-28 15:18

點樣有目共睹?... 你地都冇post 相上黎比大家參考...

作者: MoiRhapsody 時間: 2011-2-27 23:56

你連睾丸都沒有，能對你說的話有什麼要求嗎？沒有！
rockypath 發表於 2011-2-27 17:45

那麼，你對所有女人的說話都沒要求嗎？？？

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2011-2-28 00:01

那麼，你對所有女人的說話都沒要求嗎？？？
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2011-2-28 15:56

當然首先要要求她們有睾丸啊!

作者: rockypath 時間: 2011-2-28 00:04

那麼，你對所有女人的說話都沒要求嗎？？？
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2011-2-27 23:56

你是否低能到不能理解我在講什麼？

你非要逼我叫他太監嗎？

作者: MoiRhapsody 時間: 2011-2-28 00:07

你非要逼我叫你性別歧視嗎？

作者: rockypath 時間: 2011-2-28 00:08

你非要逼我叫你性別歧視嗎？
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2011-2-28 00:07

你是如何將太監進行性別歸類的？

作者: MoiRhapsody 時間: 2011-2-28 00:21

你是如何由有沒有睾丸斷定說話的份量？

作者: rockypath 時間: 2011-2-28 00:31

你是如何由有沒有睾丸斷定說話的份量？
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2011-2-28 00:21

你完全可以對他五體投地膜拜，那是你的個人選擇。

作者: MoiRhapsody 時間: 2011-2-28 00:35

你也完全可以對人無聊至極的針對，那也是你的個人選擇。

作者: rockypath 時間: 2011-2-28 00:43

你也完全可以對人無聊至極的針對，那也是你的個人選擇。
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2011-2-28 00:35

我是喜歡針對那些假冒偽善的假洋鬼子，喜歡將他們外皮一層一層剝下來向人展示他們無知兼無恥的黑暗內心。

作者: MoiRhapsody 時間: 2011-2-28 00:49

那只更凸顯出你那比肛門更狹小的器量。

作者: Lik 時間: 2011-2-28 00:52

那只更凸顯出你那比肛門更狹小的器量。
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2011-2-28 00:49

Like~!

作者: rockypath 時間: 2011-2-28 00:55

那只更凸顯出你那比肛門更狹小的器量。
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2011-2-28 00:49

面對那幫假冒偽善的假洋鬼子，你想我還會介意被他們說器量小嗎？

作者: MoiRhapsody 時間: 2011-2-28 01:08

不對，你是介意得要死了。
否則又怎會死纏不放？？

作者: rockypath 時間: 2011-2-28 01:50

不對，你是介意得要死了。
否則又怎會死纏不放？？
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2011-2-28 01:08

這幫假冒偽善的假洋鬼子的外皮有那麼多層，又厚又硬。真是有排剝。你應該知道葛。

作者: MoiRhapsody 時間: 2011-2-28 01:52

本帖最後由 MoiRhapsody 於 2011-2-28 01:55 編輯

我只知你的私仇心又深又臭。

作者: rockypath 時間: 2011-2-28 01:57

我只知你的私仇也又深又臭。
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2011-2-28 01:52

知定唔知係你個事，唔會影響我如何剝這幫假冒偽善的假洋鬼子的皮。

作者: MoiRhapsody 時間: 2011-2-28 02:03

請繼續，你做乜都改變唔到你柒到冇朋友既個事實。

作者: rockypath 時間: 2011-2-28 02:09

請繼續，你做乜都改變唔到你柒到冇朋友既個事實。
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2011-2-28 02:03

朋友有很多種，有時沒有朋友要比有朋友好得多。

如果你夠聰明，你可能猜得出我講的是什麼。

作者: MoiRhapsody 時間: 2011-2-28 02:20

對不起，我從不孤芳自賞，
如果你夠聰明...不，你一定夠聰明，因為論自以為是這裡你算第一!！！

作者: rockypath 時間: 2011-2-28 02:24

對不起，我從不孤芳自賞，
如果你夠聰明...不，你一定夠聰明，因為論自以為是這裡你算第一!！！ ...
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2011-2-28 02:20

你以為我想自以為是就可以自以為是嗎？如果我說的不是事實，你覺得那幫假冒偽善的假洋鬼子會放過我嗎？

作者: MoiRhapsody 時間: 2011-2-28 03:17

從來是你自己不放過自己～～

作者: rockypath 時間: 2011-2-28 03:25

本帖最後由 rockypath 於 2011-2-28 03:26 編輯

從來是你自己不放過自己～～
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2011-2-28 03:17

到目前為止，我對此還是樂此不疲。
我想應該是這幫假冒偽善的假洋鬼子希望我放過他們吧？

作者: sheep 時間: 2011-2-28 09:19

朋友有很多種，有時沒有朋友要比有朋友好得多。

如果你夠聰明，你可能猜得出我講的是什麼。 ...
rockypath 發表於 2011-2-28 02:09

唔好相信武俠小說講
無敵是最寂寞
相信我講
無知係最快樂

作者: sheep 時間: 2011-2-28 09:20

Like~!
Lik 發表於 2011-2-28 00:52

give me 5

作者: rockypath 時間: 2011-2-28 09:46

相信我講
無知係最快樂
sheep 發表於 2011-2-28 09:19

祝你永遠快樂！

作者: kingkong123 時間: 2011-2-28 10:32

回復 57# rockypath

真正的假洋鬼子就系你这种人，你唔知道你的老细共产党系苏俄引入的洋鬼子吗？

睇你的死款，你的心同睾丸早就给共产党吃了

作者: rockypath 時間: 2011-2-28 10:45

回復 rockypath

真正的假洋鬼子就系你这种人，你唔知道你的老细共产党系苏俄引入的洋鬼子吗？

睇 ...
kingkong123 發表於 2011-2-28 10:32

就因為你無知兼無恥，撒潑罵大街是你的專長也是你唯一的本事。

你以為發爛咋Ｄ人就信你講？真可笑。

作者: sheep 時間: 2011-2-28 13:22

祝你永遠快樂！
rockypath 發表於 2011-2-28 09:46

被我呢啲無知激到七竅生煙
我當然係好快樂啦

作者: MoiRhapsody 時間: 2011-2-28 16:33

胡溫共青團出身,太子黨皆乃長征元老們子孫所集結成的、當有中國特色的貴族階級，他們當然是言必稱馬列，書必証馬列，事必奉馬列，死了也必向馬列報到，那馬列不是這班假洋鬼子的老祖宗是什麼？

作者: MoiRhapsody 時間: 2011-2-28 16:41

馬恩列斯毛鄧江胡溫，這是他們自己排的~

作者: kingkong123 時間: 2011-2-28 21:51

回復 59# rockypath

你真系可笑，从头到尾都是你自己无知无耻，你真系厚颜无耻甘的地步

原来甘就是你的唯一专长。共产党驯服得你唔错哦，果然叫你吠就吠，跳就跳

歡迎光臨溫哥華老友記討論區 (http://www.loyaukee.com/forum/)