溫哥華老友記討論區 - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: 世衛﹕日本食物污染嚴峻堪憂 [打印本頁]

作者: fy789 時間: 2011-3-21 14:09 標題: 世衛﹕日本食物污染嚴峻堪憂

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: lo_pak 時間: 2011-3-21 15:30

Here comes the real challenge ...
For Japan, there's still a long way to go...

作者: fy789 時間: 2011-3-21 15:42

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: lo_pak 時間: 2011-3-21 16:00

回復 3# fy789

Your conclusion may extend a bit too far...

Genes by itself have the ability to recover from radiation, but it very well depends on the pollution strength for sure...

作者: fy789 時間: 2011-3-21 16:10

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2011-3-21 16:29

Food prices are already so high and it seems like they will keep going up. I repeatly have said that the world population has to decrease by 50%+ to be self sustainable. That's why a nuclear war that wipes out half of the world might not be a bad thing.

作者: lo_pak 時間: 2011-3-21 17:13

回復 5# fy789

In nature, for the 1st 2 foot layer (top soil) of every acre of farmland there exists 50 pounds of uranium (not concentrate, for sure...

). Having a bag of cigarette gets more radiation than taking x-ray (or = 50 flight hours), talking to cell phone (oops!).... etc.

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2011-3-21 17:19

I repeatly have said that the world population has to decrease by 50%+ to be self sustainable.
快樂牛郎發表於 2011-3-22 08:29

牛兄會唔會諗住帶領呢個潮流做個先鋒?

作者: lo_pak 時間: 2011-3-21 17:29

本帖最後由 lo_pak 於 2011-3-21 17:31 編輯

回復 6# 快樂牛郎

If a nuclear war of the scale you mentioned has wiped out half of the earth population, I don't think there's any place on the world can produce safety food to satisfy the need of the remaining population...

作者: fy789 時間: 2011-3-21 18:21

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: lo_pak 時間: 2011-3-21 21:46

回復 10# fy789

Or, I will put it this way, living in many places in industrial areas are very much alike living close to Fukushima...

作者: fy789 時間: 2011-3-21 21:49

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2011-3-21 21:50

回復快樂牛郎

If a nuclear war of the scale you mentioned has wiped out half of the earth populat ...
lo_pak 發表於 2011/3/21 17:29

ya
I guess there's no way back.

作者: lo_pak 時間: 2011-3-21 21:55

回復 12# fy789

Me too...

作者: fy789 時間: 2011-3-21 22:08

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: fy789 時間: 2011-3-21 22:10

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: lo_pak 時間: 2011-3-21 22:12

本帖最後由 lo_pak 於 2011-3-21 22:15 編輯

回復 15# fy789

As expected... Anything new?

The more I concern is the underground water portion which is a more complicate part to forecast...

歡迎光臨溫哥華老友記討論區 (http://www.loyaukee.com/forum/)