Board logo

標題: 南韓民眾為抗輻射搶購碘鹽海帶 [打印本頁]
作者: peter236    時間: 2011-4-10 02:55     標題: 南韓民眾為抗輻射搶購碘鹽海帶

http://hk.news.yahoo.com/article/110410/18/npza.html

(商台)2011年4月10日 星期日 10:49

南韓    傳出4月7日會落輻射    雨的傳聞，大批民眾爲抗輻射，到超市搶購碘鹽和海帶，有主婦買了十六公斤鹽，足夠四口之家吃一年。商店貨架    上的鹽，大部分被搶購一空。民眾亦大量採購核危機發生前生產的海帶，他們擔心輻射要過幾年先至消除，所以至少要買夠一年的存貨，有到南韓旅遊的日本    遊客，亦選擇購買海帶同食鹽作為手信。
作者: nabeyaki    時間: 2011-4-10 07:50

輻射雨 seems horrible to people right now
作者: rockypath    時間: 2011-4-10 12:57

I do not understand why the Japanese government just don't step in and get the matter done. The longer it lasts the more serious damages to its people and around the world, as well as its own economy.

I will believe the Chinese government will step in right from the first minute if it happens in China. Some people may accuse there will be corruption again. Honestly, I do not care. I just want to bury the damn reactors as soon as possible.
作者: sheep    時間: 2011-4-10 14:59

if it happens in China
rockypath 發表於 2011-4-10 12:57



    you will never know
作者: rockypath    時間: 2011-4-10 15:03

you will never know
sheep 發表於 2011-4-10 14:59


At least we can tell from the record of the recent years.

They have been very responsive to natural disasters, haven't they?
作者: sheep    時間: 2011-4-10 15:04

At least we can tell from the record of the recent years.

They have been very responsive to natu ...
rockypath 發表於 2011-4-10 15:03



   yes, not preventive
作者: rockypath    時間: 2011-4-10 15:38

yes, not preventive
sheep 發表於 2011-4-10 15:04


That is the reality of China at the current situation.

You can blame them if they do not put in preventive measures for any project currently under construction or future projects.

For the damages caused by the natural disasters because of problems (for example, the old buildings was never meant to be built to withstand earthquake)  the current Chinese leaders inherited, there is not much we can blame them. Instead, we will evaluate them by examining how they lead the China now and into the future.
作者: Lik    時間: 2011-4-10 15:51

原來豆腐渣工程係天災。原來追究豆腐渣工程已被人拉晒果啲人亦都係天災～

明晒！

-力
作者: rockypath    時間: 2011-4-10 16:07

原來豆腐渣工程係天災。原來追究豆腐渣工程已被人拉晒果啲人亦都係天災～

明晒！

-力 ...
Lik 發表於 2011-4-10 15:51


一件還一件。我鄉下１９４９年前起Ｄ祖屋地震箖左係唔係都要入埋中共Ｄ數啊？ ５０、６０、７０年代起Ｄ屋有幾間會考慮地震問題？
作者: elan7e    時間: 2011-4-10 16:16

回復 3# rockypath

For the first part: 死不認錯的性格使然。
作者: elan7e    時間: 2011-4-10 16:17

回復 4# sheep


  同意。
作者: Lik    時間: 2011-4-10 17:06

一件還一件。我鄉下１９４９年前起Ｄ祖屋地震箖左係唔係都要入埋中共Ｄ數啊？ ５０、６０、７０年代起Ｄ屋有幾間會考慮地震問題？
rockypath 發表於 2011-4-10 16:07

仆街，你咪撚響度顛倒是非！汶川地震果陣，係啲舊屋反而可以無事，但新建成果啲就全部淋晒。

果時啲新聞全部都有報㗎啦？係得你條撚樣咁到要嘗試幫阿爺兜嘅嗟？

賤種！

-力
作者: rockypath    時間: 2011-4-10 17:20

仆街，你咪撚響度顛倒是非！汶川地震果陣，係啲舊屋反而可以無事，但新建成果啲就全部淋晒。

果時啲新聞 ...
Lik 發表於 2011-4-10 17:06


我幾時有否定豆腐渣工程存在？ 我響中國見過Ｄ豆腐渣工程絕對多過你。 你去過中國咩？

係都要將Ｄ事混埋講。 係唔係堆霖中共就解決到問題？ 比力仔你做國家主席好唔好？

我都想聽下你對管理國家有咩野高見。
作者: peter236    時間: 2011-4-12 12:54

本帖最後由 peter236 於 2011-4-12 12:56 編輯
That is the reality of China at the current situation.

You can blame them if they do not put in  ...
rockypath 發表於 2011-4-10 15:38


In the past, in China the building code did not require buildings to be earthquake proof.

Just like in Vancouver, many schools and the Vancouver city hall were built when the building code was different and did not require earthquake proof. These are not tofu buildings, even if they collapse in an earthquake.



歡迎光臨 溫哥華老友記討論區 (http://www.loyaukee.com/forum/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2