溫哥華老友記討論區 - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: 結婚 vs Common Law [打印本頁]

作者: yokult 時間: 2011-6-28 07:49 標題: 結婚 vs Common Law

眼見新聞話離婚﹐而且有D西人同事就算生埋仔都唔唸住結婚﹐住埋一齊做 Common Law 算。

忽然唸﹐其實 Common Law 同 married 在法律上有乜唔同? 以我所知﹐住埋一齊一年就算 Common Law. 唔知稅務有乜唔同﹐分手時會唔會好似離婚o甘分身家?

當然﹐為左父母 expectation, 第時生左小朋友﹐都係會結婚比小朋友一個正常家庭長大。

結婚係唔係比女方一個保障﹐等個男人無o甘易走~ 哈哈~

作者: Look4chrisng 時間: 2011-6-28 08:34

Tax is the same. I think everyone legally and tax-wise is the same.

But it makes a big difference psychologically to me. Both parties are less committed to the relationship.

Just go sign the paper, and you don't have to have a wedding ma.

作者: sheep 時間: 2011-6-28 08:36

回復 2# Look4chrisng

分開使唔使分身家？

作者: sko 時間: 2011-6-28 08:36

According to the BC Family Relations Act, the making of a claim for a division of property that says who gets what when a marriage ends doesn't apply to common-law relationships.

作者: 匿名 時間: 2011-6-28 08:40

係啊﹐我地同律師傾過﹐好似結唔結婚﹐法律上真係無咩分別架

但係﹐你介紹比朋友時﹐說﹕我的老公/老婆﹐比起﹕我的男友/女友﹐好似多左D歸屬感﹐共同感﹐親切感。。。之類之類囉。。。畢竟﹐男女朋友好容易換畫﹐老公老婆嘛﹐起碼都有D手續要辦先分得到手﹐就係o甘

我係結婚支持者﹐女人﹐最少都要結一次

作者: sheep 時間: 2011-6-28 08:44

回復 5# 匿名

咁 KEEP 住個 RELATIONSHIP 都可以喎
轉地下情都好玩喎

作者: yokult 時間: 2011-6-28 09:06

如果 common law 無得分身家，gum 就好大分別 wor。

Look4chrisng: I don't know if common law can still use the Spouse Tax Credit.

作者: Look4chrisng 時間: 2011-6-28 09:23

本帖最後由 Look4chrisng 於 2011-6-28 09:26 編輯

tax is the same for sure.
I am not 100% sure about the legal part.  But at least the property is divided by each partner's effort.  Generally homemaker and income earner  are considered contributing the same effort.  Same effort means 50-50.  I guess a better lawyer may get more lor.

But sometime even in a divorce,  you want the woman to get more, since she usually has your kids

作者: rockypath 時間: 2011-6-28 10:34

Living together under a common law sounds almost equal to living with sex partner to me.

Don't want to sign the paper sounds "wanting to leave a back door open" to me.

I am a supporter of signing that piece of "useless" paper.

作者: hium 時間: 2011-6-28 11:53

講分手真係太容易

如果有細路仔最好都係結婚好啲

作者: FiChai 時間: 2011-6-28 13:05

I wonder why people prefer common law instead of marriage. If a person doesn't want to commit in a relationship, then he/she shouldn't get into a relationship with anyone in the first place. I won't mind living together first and then get married after, but common law is definitely not the final goal to me.

作者: KittyLeung74 時間: 2011-6-28 13:20

回復 7# yokult

Common Law 都有得分身家
Marriage包含承諾&愛,仲要係向大家宣認的承諾,好實在,Common law不能代替

作者: simon 時間: 2011-6-28 13:41

According to the BC Family Relations Act, the making of a claim for a division of property that says ...
sko 發表於 2011-6-28 08:36

but according to the case law, the Supreme Court of Canada has recognized the utility and value of household labour since the 60s and 70s. On separation the common law spouse could potentially claim the other person's property.

作者: 匿名 時間: 2011-6-28 14:22

總之基本權益﹐結唔結婚係無分別架。。。反而﹐若是一方面好有錢﹐一方面窮D﹐唔結婚 (同居) 的福利係好過結左婚。。。若有子女則更加﹐因為有所謂單親爸媽津貼呀。。。

怪只怪加拿大係一個怪社會﹐而家改都改唔切啦﹐惟有任由 D 人 take advantage 囉

作者: sko 時間: 2011-6-28 14:40

but according to the case law, the Supreme Court of Canada has recognized the utility and value of ...
simon 發表於 2011-6-28 13:41

Yes, aka trust claims. Yet, trust claims bona fide remedies are difficult to prove, especially in the content of common law relationships.

作者: Look4chrisng 時間: 2011-6-28 14:43

回復 14# 匿名

People really do that? I know CRA can deem a couple as married on tax issues.

I think this kind of arrangement has more down size the money it gains.

A lots of things are more important that a little bit of money.

作者: 匿名 時間: 2011-6-28 14:46

回復匿名

People really do that? I know CRA can deem a couple as married on tax issues.

I think ...
Look4chrisng 發表於 2011-6-28 14:43

唉~~ 親眼見過﹐仲唔知一宗添﹐真係好有衝動去告發架。。。畢竟我地係納稅人﹐個D係我地的錢黎啊

特別係大陸來的 couples﹐好識呢D法律罅。。。更甚的﹐將小孩帶回大陸養﹐最多$600 人民幣夠一個月﹐但他們個個月拿政府幾百﹐都唔知幾發啊﹐有得幾個細路的﹐真係豬籠入水添啊

作者: zuesel 時間: 2011-7-6 14:19

I personally don't believe in living together before marriage. If there's a decision to commit, it is a promise to yourself and the partner for life. "Trying a relationship" to me includes a backdoor and an indication of "in-security" in a loving relationship. So why bother?

作者: meowmeowmeow 時間: 2011-7-6 21:22

I wonder why people prefer common law instead of marriage. If a person doesn't want to commit in a r ...
FiChai 發表於 2011-6-28 13:05

Totally aggree!!!

歡迎光臨溫哥華老友記討論區 (http://www.loyaukee.com/forum/)