溫哥華老友記討論區 - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: 新電視 [打印本頁]

作者: satil 時間: 2011-8-14 16:44 標題: 新電視

上一部46" LCD 電視燒咗Backlite.

買咗部LG 55" LED LCD.

睇咗個新電視成個月，始終唔能夠習慣到啲咁高質既55” 120mHz led lcd畫面，太靚，太清，以前睇唔到既細緻部份，現在都睇得清清楚楚！　

比以前有太多視覺訊息，豐富到反而覺得唔能夠接受。

大家有冇同樣經歷??

作者: 老友四號 時間: 2011-8-14 17:13

冇咁嘅經历。
似係晒嘢多D囉。

作者: blue20ae 時間: 2011-8-14 17:29

上一部46" LCD 電視燒咗Backlite.

買咗部LG 55" LED LCD.

睇咗個新電視成個月，始終唔能夠習慣到啲咁高質 ...
satil 發表於 2011-8-14 16:44

請問你用mud試機?

作者: Lik 時間: 2011-8-14 17:40

Had a similar experience years ago when I switched from a tiny 28" CRT to our current widescreen LCD (38"? 40"? 42" 46"? Dun remember la). I'd say the problem has more to do with your living room's size and how far you are sitting from the TV.

With the old 28" CRT, I remember myself always sitting on the floor in the front half of the living room. Since we bought the larger LCD though, my preferred viewing distance moved back a bit to the back half of the living room.

When I am at the TV / electronics store, I would never complain about good fidelity and clarity of the images. I suspect the problem you are running into now is, your TV might be a bit too big for your living room, or you might be watching it from too close. The thing with our field of vision is, it primarily separates into two areas: one is the primary area of focus, and the other is your peripheral vision. The primary area of focus is designed to reproduce high quality visuals, while our peripheral vision is responsible (and therefore more sensitive) to movement at the cost of image resolution. If your TV is too big, or you are sitting too close, the tv screen fills not only your primary area of focus, but also your peripheral vision. When the stuff from the screen moves, and it falls on your peripheral vision, your brain will process that information and try to notify you of those movements because that is how our brain is wired -- if ancient caveman didn't respond to those peripheral vision warnings, they'll likely get eaten by the saber tooth tiger. But not, the peripheral vision's signals just becomes an annoying distraction that prevents you from focusing on what you want to look at.

If you could, try to sit back further when you are watching TV la?

-Lik

作者: lo_pak 時間: 2011-8-14 17:45

回復 1# satil

You will get used to it...

作者: 布小熊 時間: 2011-8-14 18:51

still waiting for LED (Not LED LCD) to drop to my price range

My CRT works fine and doesn't look like it will die any time soon.

作者: satil 時間: 2011-8-14 18:52

回復 2# 老友四號

千五蚊嘢... 小兒科... 晒嚟把乜! 只係奇怪, 問吓大家... 有冇同感.

作者: satil 時間: 2011-8-14 18:57

回復 4# Lik

that make sense.. thx.. will try move chair away from tv.... now is 12'

usually ... tv size x 2.5 = my chair distance...so i put it on 12' ...
let me try 15'/18' see if its better....

作者: satil 時間: 2011-8-14 19:01

回復 3# blue20ae

試過dvd.. ps3... 以至tv本身去讀nlda server播hd mp4/avi.... 都有同一感覺, 主角太sharp, 背境又太多 (以前從未如此豐富) !

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2011-8-14 19:51

睇睇下就慣架喇.

作者: satil 時間: 2011-8-14 22:13

回復 10# mcjohnjohn

你可能啱... 老人家, 個腦自然有啲古板... take time.... may be...

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2011-8-14 22:20

回復 mcjohnjohn

你可能啱... 老人家, 個腦自然有啲古板... take time.... may be... ...
satil 發表於 2011-8-15 14:13

你應該係一個追得上潮流同新科技既老人家, 我好有信心你好快就適應得到.

作者: martintin 時間: 2011-8-14 22:40

邊度買?
有乜好介紹?

作者: pkphilip 時間: 2011-8-14 22:46

This one was on sale way below cost in many retailers for $1499 last 2 weeks ago.
http://www.futureshop.ca/en-CA/p ... ex621/10164601.aspx

I was so tempted, but 55" is too big.

Philip

作者: Lik 時間: 2011-8-14 22:48

Fraser夾41果間Audiotronics啲野幾平，但吼到Costco, Future Shop, Best Buy, Visions等等去以本傷人，蝕住咁來賣 door crashers嘅話，咁就梗係仲正啦～

作者: sheep 時間: 2011-8-15 09:36

tv, sharp is the best selection

作者: fy789 時間: 2011-8-15 09:56

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: pkphilip 時間: 2011-8-16 21:36

本帖最後由 pkphilip 於 2011-8-16 21:37 編輯

tv, sharp is the best selection
sheep 發表於 2011-8-15 09:36

Only the Aquos line is good, the other lower model is garbage. I guess you get what you paid.

Just bought the Panasoinc 42" U25 series (IPS panel, 120Hz) for $649, not bad for entry model 42".

Philip

歡迎光臨溫哥華老友記討論區 (http://www.loyaukee.com/forum/)