溫哥華老友記討論區 - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: 犯婦人：香港有自由，但應只在自己的家及自己地方 [打印本頁]

作者: Lik 時間: 2011-8-19 13:16 標題: 犯婦人：香港有自由，但應只在自己的家及自己地方

http://www.rthk.org.hk/rthk/news ... 10819_55_778310.htm

范徐麗泰：政府保安安排　並非討好領導人
2011-08-19 HKT 16:58

全國人大常委范徐麗泰認為，香港有言論自由及表達自由，但不代表中央賓客去到哪裡也要看到示威。

她又認為香港有自由，但應只在自己的家及自己地方，即使要參與遊行，也要知會警方。

范徐麗泰說，香港是中國其中一個城市，領導人去到內地其他地方，也有同樣做法，不認為事件嚴重到影響自由，如果完全沒有控制，就被人感到香港控制不到場面，強調特區政府保安安排，不是討好領導人，只是禮節及保護領導人，待客之道與一國兩制無關。

范徐麗泰又說，中央宣布多項利港措施，對國家有利、對香港有利，惠及香港可能長達 5 至 10 年，希望大家能顧全大局。

作者: Lik 時間: 2011-8-19 13:19

本帖最後由 Lik 於 2011-8-19 13:41 編輯

呢條賤婦知唔知道自己講緊乜撚野呀？只有自己嘅屋企先至有自由？去遊行又要知會警方？

照佢咁講，咁每年七.一特區公安局咪要接十幾萬個電話？人--特別係香港人--有 freedom of mobility。去邊度、做乜野，又關你條賤婦撚事呀？！

-力

作者: ricrick 時間: 2011-8-19 13:38

哈哈哈，佢講野好無用腦架？

作者: rockypath 時間: 2011-8-19 13:43

本帖最後由 rockypath 於 2011-8-19 14:02 編輯

從來就沒有無限的自由。醒下啦傻仔們。

我想知道一下在加拿大和美國組織遊行是否要知會警方提出申請？如果要，那為什麼我們看不到蠢仔力鬧政府扼殺公民自由？

作者: Lik 時間: 2011-8-19 14:08

本帖最後由 Lik 於 2011-8-19 14:11 編輯

我想知道一下在加拿大和美國遊行是否要知會警方提出申請？如果要，那為什麼我們看不到蠢仔力鬧政府扼殺公民自由？
rockypath 發表於 2011-8-19 13:43

賤種，

唔該你擘大你對死人眼，睇清楚件犯婦女人講乜野。條八婆話：

即使要參與遊行，也要知會警方

搞遊行就要知會警方，但參與遊行都要？你食咗屎呀？腦閉塞呀？係咪我聖誕節去DT睇Santa Claus Parade都要打電話俾VPD，話俾阿朱一哥聽我要去睇聖誕老人呀？香港人去參加六四燭光晚會，去行七.一大遊行，又係咪要首先知會特區公安局呀？！

你條賤種就算係想歪曲事實，都唔該你醒啲啦？前兩日想老屈英國總理嘅時候，咪又係俾我踢爆你啲大話？你自己鍾意無自由，你自己鍾意做阿爺隻擦鞋狗，呢啲係你嘅事。咪撚當個個人都好似你咁撚賤狗先得㗎！

-力

作者: lo_pak 時間: 2011-8-19 14:09

本帖最後由 lo_pak 於 2011-8-19 14:15 編輯

回復 4# rockypath

I think there are 2 types, one is formal, and the other is informal.

Mostly in public area you only need to inform the police, usually (depend on number of people) they can't restrict you (unless you are doing something harmful to others) because it's your freedom...

In private area, that's another story. For sure, land owner got the rights... But, but, but, protest groups used to break the rules... On the other hand, those land owners used to let it go, otherwise there will be many problems followup...

For informal one, you know the answer...

In grey area, protest groups won't stop until they get legally sued....

作者: rockypath 時間: 2011-8-19 14:26

本帖最後由 rockypath 於 2011-8-19 14:31 編輯

前兩日想老屈英國總理嘅時候，咪又係俾我踢爆你啲大話？你自己鍾意無自由，你自己鍾意做阿爺隻擦鞋狗，呢啲係你嘅事。咪撚當個個人都好似你咁撚賤狗先得㗎！
Lik 發表於 2011-8-19 14:08

賤狗力，

First, Just show us when did I “前兩日想老屈英國總理”? I did not even say a single word about the riot in England since it broke out.

Second, just show us what kind of 大話 had I said about 英國總理? When did you 踢爆我啲大話 and how did you 踢爆我啲大話? How could you踢爆我啲大話 when I did not say a single word?

看來阿力還有另一個本事就是－憑空捏造，砌人生豬肉。

So, this is the kind of freedom you are talking about and want to have. RIGHT? Do whatever you want! RIGHT? The absolute freedom you want to have can only be built by stripping off the freedom of other people.

We all know it very well the type of shameless hypocrite you are.

P.S. I will wait for your evidence to prove what you said. 我看你這次如何憑空捏造＋死雞撐飯蓋。

蠢仔只能比人玩。

作者: Lik 時間: 2011-8-19 15:01

本帖最後由 Lik 於 2011-8-19 15:04 編輯

賤狗力，

First, Just show us when did I “前兩日想老屈英國總理”? I did not even say a single wor ...
rockypath 發表於 2011-8-19 14:26

Ok, so it wasn't you. I always get you and FY-boy mixed up because all you 5 cent kids say the same stuff anyway~

Peter is much easier to recognize because of his incredible stupidity.

咁我響呢處同你講聲「對唔住」，希望無傷害都你弱小心靈，更加無傷害到你極為脆弱嘅中國人民感情，好未？

但咪以為咁我就會放過你發雞盲，唔撚識字呢樣野喎？唔該你擘大你對死人眼，睇清楚件犯婦女人講乜野。條八婆話：

即使要參與遊行，也要知會警方

唔好避以不答呀！係咪我聖誕節去DT睇Santa Claus Parade都要打電話俾VPD，話俾阿朱一哥聽我要去睇聖誕老人呀？香港人去參加六四燭光晚會，去行七.一大遊行，又係咪要首先知會特區公安局呀？

答我啦？定係你嘅弱小心靈又試承受唔起呢份打擊呢？

-力

作者: MoiRhapsody 時間: 2011-8-19 15:06

我屌妳老母呀犯婦人？

作者: lo_pak 時間: 2011-8-19 15:24

回復 9# MoiRhapsody

Her mom is too old and probably a good lady...

作者: satil 時間: 2011-8-19 18:32

"參與遊行，也要知會警方!!!!"

乜世界 !!

作者: rockypath 時間: 2011-8-20 00:39

回復 8# Lik

你不需要對我說對不起。我更願意聽到你向大家道歉－ “對不起大家，阿力我細路仔唔知世紀。大家大人不計小人過。”

You want to have my answer? Sure, I always have the gut to face you directly unlike you always run away like a losing dog and avoid facing me.

I do not agree with what she said and she is politically stupid to say – “參與遊行需知會警方”.

Regardless what kind of freedom you ask for, the reality is – there is no “unlimited” freedom without restriction.

作者: Lik 時間: 2011-8-20 09:45

回復 Lik

I do not agree with what she said and she is politically stupid to say – “參與遊行需知會警方”.

Regardless what kind of freedom you ask for, the reality is – there is no “unlimited” freedom without restriction.
rockypath 發表於 2011-8-20 00:39

你認咗係自己發雞盲就得喇～

而且，基本法裡面明文寫住話香港人有集會、申訴、言論自由等基本權利。落街着咩衫又算唔算係 unlimited freedom呀？示威區嘅國際慣例係要示威對象可以用肉眼睇得見嘅範圍之內，但依家香港人仲有無集會、申訴、同表達意見嘅自由呀？你今次特衰政府同特區公安局如果唔係成壇野搞得咁樣衰，又會唔會俾人全方位圍插呀？

答我啦，無恥之徒！

-力

作者: rockypath 時間: 2011-8-20 19:07

本帖最後由 rockypath 於 2011-8-20 19:10 編輯

示威區嘅國際慣例係要示威對象可以用肉眼睇得見嘅範圍之內，但依家香港人仲有無集會、申訴、同表達意見嘅自由呀？你今次特衰政府同特區公安局如果唔係成壇野搞得咁樣衰，又會唔會俾人全方位圍插呀？

答我啦，無恥之徒！

Lik 發表於 2011-8-20 09:45

跟你這個愚蠢無比又不學無術的蠢人溝通真是浪費精力又浪費時間。

所謂的學者告訴你說照慣例示威區是設在目視可以看到的地方。那你是否知道過更多的慣例是設在１～２公里以外的地方。你是可以看得到，但是要有望遠鏡並且沒有大廈擋住你的視線。

美國在中國領導人訪問期間特意將示威區設在中國領導人看得到和聽得到的距離。司馬昭之心，路人皆知。但你這只狗肯定是要維護你的主人。

為什麼美國總統在視察各個州的時候，示威區被設置在他根本看不到，聽不到，記者也懶得去採訪的１～２公里之外？不肯聽從ＯＲＤＥＲ在示威區示威的示威者不單只是被驅趕，還被ＡＲＲＥＳＴ和落ＣＨＡＲＧＥ！那你這條狗有咬你的主人嗎？

真是人蠢無藥醫。浪費我時間。

作者: Lik 時間: 2011-8-21 00:08

你無野呀化？報紙、新聞成日都有報導美國總統、州長等等點樣被示威者響集會當中追擊、抗議等等都係等閒事。而Schwarzenegger更加試過被掟雞蛋、加拿大前總理 Chretien被掟pie。做得領導人就預咗有反對聲音。唔識得處之太然嘅你就咪撚做領導人啦～

而且你都仲未答我：今次特衰政府同特區公安局如果唔係成壇野搞得咁樣衰，又會唔會俾人全方位圍插呀？依家又使唔使出來解咁多話呀？

人賤無藥醫。返去舔阿爺屎眼啦，契弟！

-力

作者: rockypath 時間: 2011-8-21 01:17

你無野呀化？報紙、新聞成日都有報導美國總統、州長等等點樣被示威者響集會當中追擊、抗議等等都係等閒事。 ...
Lik 發表於 2011-8-21 00:08

Don't waste my time idiot mad dong Lik.

Just prove what I said about the "protest zoon" is not true. Don't waste my time with you stupid BS.

Second, I don't think what HK police did is unreasonably unacceptable. In fact, I don't think it is that serious. Compare to US Security Service. HK police is absolutely 小巫見大巫，拍馬都追不上。 Again, just prove US Security Service has a softer hand than HK police instead of wasting my time again.

I will wait for your proof. But don't waste my time with you worthless craps again.

作者: Lik 時間: 2011-8-21 10:57

Second, I don't think what HK police did is unreasonably unacceptable. In fact, I don't think it is that serious. Compare to US Security Service. HK police is absolutely 小巫見大巫，拍馬都追不上。 Again, just prove US Security Service has a softer hand than HK police instead of wasting my time again.
rockypath 發表於 2011-8-21 01:17

所以你係賤人一名。

特區公安響無警告、無表面身份嘅情況之下就拉咗着6.4tee果位阿哥，咁做根本就係犯法嘅所為。而對港大嘅同學就更加做出非法禁錮。你公安係夠料嘅話就拘捕呢兩條友啦？再唔係告埋佢地添啦？US Security Service又好，老美警察又好，零星嘅違規事件絕對會發生，但好似香港今次咁樣有組織、有部署、有計劃嘅犯法行為你又幾時見過呀，賤種？！

而且，你都仲係未答我呀，死剷！今次特衰政府同特區公安局如果唔係成壇野搞得咁樣衰，又會唔會俾人全方位圍插呀？依家又使唔使出來解咁多話呀？答啦，仆街！

-力

作者: rockypath 時間: 2011-8-21 16:42

而且，你都仲係未答我呀，死剷！今次特衰政府同特區公安局如果唔係成壇野搞得咁樣衰，又會唔會俾人全方位圍插呀？依家又使唔使出來解咁多話呀？答啦，仆街！
Lik 發表於 2011-8-21 10:57

Did you not understand my human talk? I had said I had not much complain about HK government and police force. They got their jobs to do. There are certainly areas they can work on to improve as always in any event. You can never please everyone.

俾人全方位圍插? Just look at who are 插ing HK government and police.

歡迎光臨溫哥華老友記討論區 (http://www.loyaukee.com/forum/)