Board logo

標題: 睇咗網友提供嘅VIEDO。 [打印本頁]

作者: 老友四號    時間: 2011-8-30 14:15     標題: 睇咗網友提供嘅VIEDO。

睇咗網友提供嘅有美國大学电擊糞青,老夫 深感一向号称自由&民主嘅美國(题外話:中國近年有咁多官、商

嘅二或三代在此落地生根,唔知是否原因於此?)都尚且如此。

中國又何妨超英趕美更上層楼!實行用机关鎗掃射聚众鬧事的学生,當年秦始皇坑咗四百多个儒算係乜!

今日射夠四千多个儒又如何!?对此輩 糞青 絕不可姑息否則就係養奸。

各位有識之士你哋話啱唔啱呀?
作者: peter236    時間: 2011-8-30 14:26

你條老淫蟲,又係度亂噏,當秘笈,收皮喇。
作者: 老友四號    時間: 2011-8-30 14:29

回復 2# peter236
你真似係食屎多过食飯
作者: peter236    時間: 2011-8-30 14:39

你條老淫蟲,又係度亂噏,當秘笈,收皮喇
回復  peter236
你真似係食屎多过食飯!
老友四號 發表於 2011-8-30 14:29


你條淫蟲. 收皮喇.
作者: ricrick    時間: 2011-8-30 23:16

睇咗網友提供嘅有美國大学电擊糞青,老夫 深感一向号称自由&民主嘅美國(题外話:中國近年有咁多官、商

嘅 ...
老友四號 發表於 2011-8-30 14:15



共產黨死人何止四千?
作者: chunsh    時間: 2011-8-31 00:06

共產黨死人何止四千?
ricrick 發表於 2011-8-30 23:16



那不關共產與否的事﹐固然它殺了很多中國人
但殘殺自己人是我們民族的專長卻切切實實的刻在中史裡
秦﹐漢﹐唐.......﹐明﹐清﹐民國都是一樣
作者: ricrick    時間: 2011-8-31 12:30

本帖最後由 ricrick 於 2011-8-31 12:32 編輯
那不關共產與否的事﹐固然它殺了很多中國人
但殘殺自己人是我們民族的專長卻切切實實的刻在中史裡
秦﹐ ...
chunsh 發表於 2011-8-31 00:06


你這樣說都好合理
就好似身為一個汽車維修員,有個士巴拿旁身都係好合邏輯
身為共產黨吾殺中國人殺誰
作者: chunsh    時間: 2011-8-31 12:36

你這樣說都好合理
就好似身為一個汽車維修員,有個士巴拿旁身都係好合邏輯
身為共產黨吾殺中國人殺誰 ...
ricrick 發表於 2011-8-31 12:30



I didn't say 共產黨殺中國人 is correct, don't push words into my mouth or twist my meaning. I just want to point out, to be fair, killing our own race is our strength, no matter who is ruling the people
作者: 布小熊    時間: 2011-8-31 12:41

就好似身為一個汽車維修員,有個士巴拿旁身都係好合邏輯
ricrick 發表於 2011-8-31 12:30 PM


haha I almost forgot about this phrase!!
That scene pop up in my head now.
作者: B2L2    時間: 2011-8-31 13:50

I didn't say 共產黨殺中國人 is correct, don't push words into my mouth or twist my meaning. I jus ...
chunsh 發表於 2011-8-31 12:36


So everything is logical and nothing needs to be changed.  Just let the history repeats itself and live with it.  NICE, and thanks for pointing that out.
作者: chunsh    時間: 2011-8-31 14:24

So everything is logical and nothing needs to be changed.  Just let the history repeats itself and ...
B2L2 發表於 2011-8-31 13:50


as I remember my first history lesson, the teacher said that the reason for learning the human history, is to absorb the failure experiences from the history so that we won't step into the wrong track again.
more than 20 years have passed, from what I saw/watch/read, I knew that yes, something we can learn from history that we won't repeat the same mistake again (or able to derive a work-around), but the sad truth is, for some particular incidence


仲有﹐由頭到尾我無話過人唔需要去改進/改變
you, too, don't push words into my mouth.
Again, I just want people to have 闊一D既視野﹐共產黨係過去60 年可能係令到好多人死﹐o甘唔係共唔共產既問題﹐
而係我地整個民族既問題。你話要學習歷史呀嘛﹐要真正係歷史吸取教訓﹐就要知道真正既問題o係邊度。歷史上都證明﹐我地自己人殺自己人係最多﹐任何政權都有發生。要改, 就要從我地民族既性格去改﹐講真﹐共產其實都係"鬼佬"野。3民主義又如何?  100年前咪又俾國民黨搞到軍閥割據﹐內戰連連
作者: ricrick    時間: 2011-8-31 15:11

本帖最後由 ricrick 於 2011-8-31 15:12 編輯
as I remember my first history lesson, the teacher said that the reason for learning the human his ...
chunsh 發表於 2011-8-31 14:24



問題在於權力,權力過度集中,慘劇就會重覆,共慘黨這種獨裁政府,重覆歷史都是遲早
從前孫中山都無想過民主的人民權力,是可隨時更換政府
作者: chunsh    時間: 2011-8-31 15:21

問題在於權力,權力過度集中,慘劇就會重覆,共慘黨這種獨裁政府,重覆歷史都是遲早
從前孫中山都無想過 ...
ricrick 發表於 2011-8-31 15:11


所以我覺得﹐要completely改變中國既situation / avoid repeating the history﹐
就係要改變呢2XXX 年以來根深蒂固既儒家思想﹐但﹐在沒有massive流血事件發生
在大前題之下﹐你認為這改變會有可能發生嗎
作者: B2L2    時間: 2011-8-31 15:38

If I agree with you that "任何政權都有發生問題", could you tell me what's the best method for people to vote down a 政權 when they see potential problem coming?

If you said the basic thing to change is "民族既性格" (which I don't quite agree), does this current government do anything on this aspect?  If they don't, should they get the blame?

For me, I think education is the basic thing to be improved and not to change their "性格".
作者: ricrick    時間: 2011-8-31 15:52

所以我覺得﹐要completely改變中國既situation / avoid repeating the history﹐
就係要改變呢2XXX 年以 ...
chunsh 發表於 2011-8-31 15:21



「奇蹟」在於領導們無啦啦得到神的啟示想放下權利推動民主

第一,中共自行結束一黨專政。開放人民組黨自由
第二,中共可成為過渡政府,有計劃的帶領、協助或資助其他政黨。建立議會制度,制訂良好憲法,以法治國
第三,教育人民,做好公民教育,提升人民道德水平,才不致受人利用,達到公平公正
作者: 老友四號    時間: 2011-9-5 12:47

最大问题是现今中國一如过往的封建朝代一般,知識分子為了利益而向權力倾斜。

又是一句老話:历史是不断的重覆。




歡迎光臨 溫哥華老友記討論區 (http://www.loyaukee.com/forum/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2