溫哥華老友記討論區 - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: [中國新聞] China-made big screen aim to break IMAX monopoly [打印本頁]

作者: peter236 時間: 2012-4-10 18:41 標題: China-made big screen aim to break IMAX monopoly

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/entertainment/2012-04/10/c_131517378.htm

Makers of China-made big screen aim to break IMAX monopoly
English.news.cn 2012-04-10 13:37:54

HEFEI, April 9 (Xinhua) -- DMAX, a large film screen made with Chinese independent technology, on Monday was put into commercial use in a cinema in the eastern province of Anhui, as developers hope to break the IMAX monopoly in China's booming film market.

IMAX is currently the most widely used big screen motion picture format and was created by the Canadian company IMAX Corporation. China has nearly 60 IMAX screens, each with a size of at least 22 by 16 meters.

DMAX, with a standard screen of 20 by 12 meters, is jointly developed by China Research Institute of Film Science & Technology and China Film Co., Ltd. A DMAX screen had a trial run in a Beijing cinema last year.

According to Yang Xuepei, head of the institute, while embodying the country's independent core technology of big screen motion pictures production and image optimization, DMAX is also compatible with the most advanced technology overseas. Its 2D and 3D screening quality are as good as large screens of foreign brands.

Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation and Universal Pictures have respectively offered the original materials of ongoing blockbusters "Titanic 3D" and "Battleship" for DMAX screening conversion, Yang revealed Monday in Hefei, capital of Anhui, where the first DMAX screen was unveiled for permanent use.

"DMAX will have as many foreign films as IMAX does, and will also get two home-made films every month," Yang said, citing a favorable stipulation by the State Administration of Radio, Film and Television.

Insiders have also pinned high hopes on DMAX.

Fu Ruoqing, deputy general manager of China Film Group Corporation, saw the launch of DMAX as laying the foundation for the country's independent intellectual property rights in the field of film projection equipment and technology.

"With DMAX, China has entered the world stage of hi-tech film format," Fu said.

"DMAX will have abundant screening sources, and neither cinema chains nor filmgoers need to pay much considering the moderate patent fees for its technology," said Yang Buting, head of the China Film Distribution and Exhibition Association.

"It might break the monopoly of IMAX in our cinema market," Yang said.

According to Yang Xuepei, a total of 15 DMAX screens will be installed in cinemas in Shanghai, Guangzhou, Chengdu and several other cities this year.

作者: 嘉嘉 時間: 2012-4-10 19:14

DMAX...........lol
nice name.......XD

作者: Quest 時間: 2012-4-11 05:35

What's new from China these days?!

*yawn*

Q.

作者: peter236 時間: 2012-4-11 13:53

本帖最後由 peter236 於 2012-4-11 13:59 編輯

yeah, another day, another announcement.
Every day we see Chinese companies making technological progress and taking on new markets. Chinese technology is now among the best in the world. Foreigners no longer have monopoly.

作者: Ovaltine 時間: 2012-4-26 08:00

Technological progress through imitations, no creativity and innovation at all.

作者: Catpiano 時間: 2012-4-26 14:24

Oh yeah .. Oh yeah ..

Oh .. ok .. awesome ..

lol

作者: peter236 時間: 2012-4-26 14:47

本帖最後由 peter236 於 2012-4-26 14:55 編輯

Technological progress through imitations, no creativity and innovation at all.
Ovaltine 發表於 2012-4-26 08:00

How is that an imitation?
So China should not build big screens, just because other countries build big screen?
China's version of big screen technology is more advanced and innovative than existing big screens.

作者: imvitasoy 時間: 2012-4-26 15:17

外地人用阿拉係世界領袖眼光睇中國，成日都好兩極化，一係睇到好勁面，一係睇到好差面。
不過佢哋好多都唔知道(亦好怕知道)，猜拿好多民用科技已經head 咗世界，大電視是其一，制冷系統是其二。高鐵如果唔係上年hi 菠蘿，也是一哥，仲有好多其他。

作者: BiscottiGelato 時間: 2012-4-26 17:25

can't even think of a unique name...

Sigh... when will the Chinese start to innovate?

作者: peter236 時間: 2012-4-26 21:54

外地人用阿拉係世界領袖眼光睇中國，成日都好兩極化，一係睇到好勁面，一係睇到好差面。
不過佢哋好多都唔知道(亦好怕知道)，猜拿好多民用科技已經head 咗世界，大電視是其一，制冷系統是其二。高鐵如果唔係上年hi 菠蘿，也是一哥，仲有好多其他。
imvitasoy 發表於 2012-4-26 15:17

That's true, the foreigners only believe what they want to believe. They are uneasy about China's rapid technology innovation in many areas.

作者: imvitasoy 時間: 2012-4-27 10:34

講漏咗電池車技術，好有機會橫掃世界。Warren Buffet 唔會同黃臉佬談情，入股唔係死錯人。

作者: Ovaltine 時間: 2012-4-28 09:53

回復 11# imvitasoy

Have you checked where BYD stock prices is going? Corruption problems,share price dwindling. Buffet's biggest mistake yet.

作者: imvitasoy 時間: 2012-4-28 23:37

(1) 市場活動，行外人永遠是管中窺豹。如果單以股價而論，BYD H-share price 最高時近HK$ 100 不用說，今天插水仍值 HK$ 20, 而W.Buffet 在2008 年入股的價錢是幾多錢？是1 蚊雞美金，where the mistake is ?

(2) 說中國沒有invention 是不真實的。BYD 的電池技術，從2008 年到現在2012 年，起碼在PR 公眾資料上看，的確仍處世界先列。情況會不會改變？肯定會，會變壞，也會變好，在乎你從甚麼角度看。

(3) 將中國任何事情都同corruption 拉上關系, 實在是太容易了。美國/加拿大無corruption? 唔好開玩笑啦。在下老婆今天先去讀左一個compulsory 的電腦課程，CAD 120，學用 Words。你覺得好正常？在下就覺得同生劏水魚無分別，而且是政府批准的。遊戲規則不同，所以玩法唔同而已。

作者: imvitasoy 時間: 2012-4-29 00:13

打錯字，學用 Office Word....

作者: peter236 時間: 2012-4-29 00:45

本帖最後由 peter236 於 2012-4-29 00:47 編輯

回復 imvitasoy

Have you checked where BYD stock prices is going? Corruption problems,share price dwindling. Buffet's biggest mistake yet.
Ovaltine 發表於 2012-4-28 09:53

How is that a mistake? You need to know how and when to take profits.
If you are smart, you need to buy low, then sell high, and then buy back again at the low again.

作者: Ovaltine 時間: 2012-5-3 19:06

回復 13# imvitasoy

1. After his great anticipation with the BYD, would you think he would invest in any more Chinese stock in the future? Not likely, because business structure in China is not based on honesty and integrity, lots of frauds in stocks going on.

2. A population of 1.3 billion is gonna invent something, but question is why shouldn't we be inventing more? You can blame it on their education systemm which kills the curiosity of little kids, whack them into discipline and turn our children in to robots. Why? so they can be slaves for the Foxconn when they grow up. The west has Facebook, Apple, Research in Motion, Google, KFC, Mcdonalds, Subway. What do we have? BYD, malfunctioning trains...

3. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corruption_Perceptions_Index
Don't know why you are connecting a course to corruption, I really don't see the connection.

作者: peter236 時間: 2012-5-3 22:25

本帖最後由 peter236 於 2012-5-3 22:26 編輯

回復 imvitasoy

2. A population of 1.3 billion is gonna invent something, but question is why shouldn't we be inventing more? You can blame it on their education systemm which kills the curiosity of little kids, whack them into discipline and turn our children in to robots. Why? so they can be slaves for the Foxconn when they grow up. The west has Facebook, Apple, Research in Motion, Google, KFC, Mcdonalds, Subway.

Ovaltine 發表於 2012-5-3 19:06

He is still heavily invested in China. China has its own GPS, CPU, Huawei, ZTE, Baidu, Weibo, wind power, solar power etc

KFC, Mcdonalds? LOL

作者: imvitasoy 時間: 2012-5-4 12:21

回復 16# Ovaltine

你的意見，在下沒精力回應。
好處是，這裡的一文一字，都算是立此存照。

作者: Ovaltine 時間: 2012-5-6 19:05

Nationalism is a negative trait because it is an ideology that fools people and your ownself. Love humanity, and be very skeptical of institutions.

歡迎光臨溫哥華老友記討論區 (http://www.loyaukee.com/forum/)