溫哥華老友記討論區 - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: Shame on the (federal) Liberals and NDP!!! [打印本頁]

作者: Lik 時間: 2008-12-1 15:02 標題: Shame on the (federal) Liberals and NDP!!!

http://www.vancouversun.com/oppo ... /1017518/story.html

My letter to Her Excellency Michaelle Jean, PM Harper, and scumbag Dion/Layton:

To Her Excellency Michaelle Jean, Prime Minister Harper, Mr. Dion, and Mr. Layton,

It is with great disgust and much anger that I am writing to protest against the dirty political ploy put together by the Liberals and the NDP.

I will be quite frank here – when Canadians from coast to coast headed to the polls on October 14, 2008, we have spoken as a whole and voted for the Conservative Party to be our biggest political representatives in the House of Commons. Following our proud nation's long standing democratic traditions, this also means we, as Canadians, have voted for the Conservative Party to lead a minority government on Parliament Hill with the Conservative Party leader, Mr. Stephen Harper, as our Prime Minister. The matter has long been settled – for a good month and a half, Canadians from coast to coast (and this includes members of the Liberal Party and the NDP) have all agreed to honour and respect the results of the federal election and recognize Mr. Harper as our Prime Minister.

Had the Liberals and the NDP wanted to form a coalition government and elect Liberal leader, Mr. Stephane Dion, to be Canada's Prime Minister instead, they should have proposed the plan to Her Excellency, Michaelle Jean immediately following the election. Such a proposal would have deviated from the traditional process of Canadian elections, but at least the sore losers' salvage attempt could be disguised as a fresh political revival to our age-old system.

But time for such opportunities has passed. To call for a Liberal-NDP coalition government to replace the Conservative minority, and to replace Mr. Harper with Mr. Dion as the Prime Minister, is a blatant insult to Canada's long-standing democratic process. After all the political bickering and gesturing, and given all the backroom political dealing and scheming that have been revealed, it is plainly obvious that the Liberal Party and the NDP have no regard for the goods and interests of Canada in their minds. Their only concern is to shamelessly satisfy their lust for power, Canada be damned!

As the Opposition to our minority government, the Liberal-NDP coalition is bestowed with the power to overthrow the Conservative minority government via a vote of (no) confidence. In light of that, I welcome the Liberal-NDP coalition to exercise their right to a no confidence vote. But, following such votes of (no) confidence, the proper procedure under the Canadian democratic process dictates that Her Excellency, Michaelle Jean, must dissolve parliament and call for a new federal election.

Instead of relying on slimey backroom dealings and dirty political scheming to decide who forms our parliament and who serves as our prime minister, I know that nation-wide, Canadians will accept nothing less than the open and fair democratic system that has dutifully served us for over 140 years.

-Lik of Vancouver, BC

作者: Lik 時間: 2008-12-1 15:04

I urge fellow LYKs to look at what is happening on Parliament Hill, and think for themselves that should a new federal election come again, who would you vote for and why you would vote for him and his party.

Politics and democracy is about choosing the lesser of the two (or three) evils.

-Lik

作者: somewhereintime 時間: 2008-12-1 15:08

原帖由 Lik 於 2008-12-1 16:04 發表
I urge fellow LYKs to look at what is happening on Parliament Hill, and think for themselves that should a new federal election come again, who would you vote for and why you would vote for him and hi ...

x 2
What a shame

作者: goldie 時間: 2008-12-1 15:18

係呀，果班ottawa人淨係識玩政治，
絕對唔識真正關心經濟民生囉。
不過我唔信Liberal同NDP 合作得成功喎，
到左關鍵既時刻，佢地自然會鬼打鬼。
呢個就係加拿大勒。

作者: ACC-HE 時間: 2008-12-1 15:29

did you really send in your letter? e-mail? snailmail?

作者: masterbear 時間: 2008-12-1 16:14

Still remembered really clearly to our LOVELY DION said after the next date of the election Oct 14, 08. said he and his party will fully support the Conservative Party Mr. Harper because of the World Crisis. Before he, Mr. Dion said he won't step down from Liberal Party even lost from the election and... few days after he said he will step down and let The Liberal to have another leader. Suddenly.... couple weeks after his promised amd now he may be the leader of the Opposition Group and to be our NEW PM? Comeon, what a joke and what a lier!!

To be honest, DO U THINK WE CAN TRUST?

作者: CWong 時間: 2008-12-1 16:32

呀Ｌｉｋ哥终於回家了！Welcome back！

作者: puZZle 時間: 2008-12-1 17:24

totally agree on lik gor

作者: bbqfish 時間: 2008-12-1 17:58

eee! Are you really the original Lik gor??? I think so.. no other LYK would write such letter la.. at least no one did since u last wrote a letter about the Tibet incident. Anyways, so surprised to see you coming back! Welcome back.

anyways, i doubt ur letter will have any effect. coz governor is just a symbolic leader. she doesn't have real power to say no to Layton+Dion, unless she wants another King-Byng affair. I think you should send it to the Bloc.

作者: heykevin 時間: 2008-12-1 18:03

原帖由 bbqfish 於 2008-12-1 18:58 發表
eee! Are you really the original Lik gor??? I think so.. no other LYK would write such letter la.. at least no one did since u last wrote a letter about the Tibet incident. Anyways, so surprised to ...

what was the King-Byng affair?

作者: low_B 時間: 2008-12-1 18:41

Lik, I totally agree with you!!!!

作者: BiscottiGelato 時間: 2008-12-1 19:37

Totally agree. Since last week I was already disgusted with what was going on.

Heck I totally agree with how Conservative was trying to squeeze on government spending in a variety of areas and go without a short sighted stimulus plan. Moreover, I wonder where our law is when it can be re-written somehow and changed over night (on the coalition government which sounds that it's possible without a re-election?)

If anything, and if there's a relection, it'll only go in Conservative's favor for a majority government for the Conservative.....

Anyways, hail to reduction in government spending, down Federal Liberal and Federal NDP.!!

作者: bbqfish 時間: 2008-12-1 19:44

原帖由 heykevin 於 2008-12-1 19:03 發表

what was the King-Byng affair?

didn't u learn it in social studies?? anyways, here it is.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King-Byng_Affair

作者: ACooperFan 時間: 2008-12-1 20:01

此lik是彼lik嗎?

作者: canuck 時間: 2008-12-1 20:12

原帖由 ACooperFan 於 2008-12-1 21:01 發表
此lik是彼lik嗎?

Lik is Lik. Welcome back !!

作者: heykevin 時間: 2008-12-1 20:32

原帖由 ACooperFan 於 2008-12-1 21:01 發表
此lik是彼lik嗎?

I guess admin listened to our members' advice and un-ban all the members.

作者: soli 時間: 2008-12-1 21:31

我沒有投票給保守黨﹐大部份加拿大人亦跟我一樣。如果代表大部份加拿大人既政黨反對保守黨繼續執政﹐少數服從多數﹐將保守黨拉下來有何不可﹐而且這是憲法所允許的。
保守黨在競選時期沒有提出任何挽救經濟的措施﹐執政後也漠視其他政黨對刺激經濟的要求﹐獨斷獨行。一個少數政府﹐如果一直不能跟其他政黨合作﹐繼續執政下去﹐對加拿大又有甚麼好處呢?

作者: soli 時間: 2008-12-1 21:55

這次金融海嘯﹐讓自由市場主義再次破產。為挽救經濟﹐各國政府經濟政策也向左傾斜﹐連號稱最自由經濟體﹐失業率還在4%以下的香港﹐也保證不削減政府開支﹐避免增加任何對經濟不利的因素。

偏偏有我們的保守黨﹐基於意識形態的限制﹐遲遲未能對現在惡劣的經濟環境作出任何適當反應﹐只懂賤賣國家資產﹐削減開支這些右派技倆(即不干預市場)﹐逆天而行。更以削減開支作為打擊政敵的籍口﹐以本傷人﹐令其跟其他政黨的合空間完全消失。

所以這次反對黨派要聯手推倒保守黨﹐絕對合情合理兼合法。很多人害怕政局不穩定﹐但兩害相權取其輕。若保守黨繼續執政﹐亦只會是一跛腳鴨政府﹐難以應付目前經濟環境。自由黨的理財能手不少﹐在經濟措施方面﹐我對自由黨帶領下的聯合政府更具信心~

[ 本帖最後由 soli 於 2008-12-1 22:59 編輯 ]

作者: canuck 時間: 2008-12-1 22:11

Lik Gor returns for a good cause.

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2008-12-1 22:31

我根本冇投票
因為已經唔關我事

作者: BiscottiGelato 時間: 2008-12-1 22:34

原帖由 soli 於 2008-12-1 21:55 發表
這次金融海嘯﹐讓自由市場主義再次破產。為挽救經濟﹐各國政府經濟政策也向左傾斜﹐連號稱最自由經濟體﹐失業率還在4%以下的香港﹐也保證不削減政府開支﹐避免增加任何對經濟不利的因素。

偏偏有我們的保守黨﹐基於意識形態的限制 ...

who says that increasing government spending will get us out of this mess the quickest? You are purely carrying Keynesian view of economics. There are other views that calls for minimizing government intervention, which will yes, make the immediate future hard, but on the long term allow for quicker recovery. Knee jerk reaction and showing off what the government can do something by handing out candies is not what I want, I want long term outlook and resolution. I can't say whehter capital injection or reduce government's burden on the market is the correct way to get us out of this recession the quickest. In fact, nobody out there know for SURE what is the correct action and the correcdt magnitude of action to carry out. But if anything, Liberal and NDP is mainly just pissed off on the lack of public funding they get more than any of the issue with economic stimulation. I don't see how Liberal and NDP are the less of the evils when compared to the Conservatives. If anything I like how the Conservative tries to reduce political spending from public fundings. I'm sure effort in preventing a fiscal deficit will definately be better for Canada in the long term.

作者: BiscottiGelato 時間: 2008-12-1 23:04

soli, maybe you should see what this guy has to say (Peter Schiff) on what the 'other side' will want to say as opposed to just pumping money thru 'government stimulations'

His track record:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2I0QN-FYkpw

Problem with bigger government, bigger economic stimulus. Specifically around the 8 minute mark on.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jB9fuIvksLw

I like what the Conservative is trying to do in terms of reducing government spending, at least on this round. We don't have to follow the rest of the world in pumping money, especially when we are not China which have a huge cash pile in the bank account. If anything we are more like the US, with debt in the back. If anything we should save, we should continute with fiscal surpluses.

Liberal and NDP is just crooks on this round. I'm not saying Conservative is the saviour, but definately is the lesser of the evil on this case.

[ 本帖最後由 BiscottiGelato 於 2008-12-1 23:06 編輯 ]

作者: soli 時間: 2008-12-1 23:09

那 BiscottiGelato 即認為現在政府應該甚麼也不用做。大企業銀行要倒就讓他們倒﹐失業率上升就讓他升﹐政府收入少了﹐就削減開支﹐帶頭裁減公務員﹐加稅。等到大家跳樓的跳樓﹐燒炭的燒炭。重複看兒子欠債砍母親﹐失業父親殺全家後自殺這些新聞三五七年後﹐經濟就會慢慢好了。這叫做適者生存﹐物競天擇對嗎?

[ 本帖最後由 soli 於 2008-12-2 00:11 編輯 ]

作者: fm9610 時間: 2008-12-1 23:45

I think the Liberal are crooks and the NDP is even worse. The Bloc just want to split up Canada and create their own country. The three together reminds me of the pirates in the Pirates of the Caribbean. Just wonder who represents Capt. Jack Sparrow. I think we are doomed if they start running Canada.

I support another election as it is the only viable option out of this mess.

[ 本帖最後由 fm9610 於 2008-12-2 00:48 編輯 ]

作者: Lik 時間: 2008-12-1 23:48 標題: Canadian Democratic System in Danger

To those who think there is very little you can do, or think there is very little you can change, please bear in mind that as an individual, you probably can't do much. But collectively, our voices will be heard.

To express your concerns and disgust on this matter, I urge you to contact Prime Minister Harper, Liberal leader Dion, NDP leader Layton, and the MP of your riding. Their email addresses can be found on the following page:

http://webinfo.parl.gc.ca/Member ... rent&Language=E

I would also urge you to contact Governor General, Michaelle Jean. Her contact information can be found here:

http://www.gg.ca/contactus/index_e.asp

I welcome every LYK to use my letter here as your own starting basis. Feel free to make changes as you see fit, or if you want to, you can even copy and paste the exact letter that I wrote. I only ask you to add your full name, mailing address, and telephone number at the end of your letter to identify yourself to the GG Jean and the MPs, signifying that the letter came from an independent Canadian.

If you support the Liberal-NDP coalition, I urge you to make your voice heard as well.

Exercise your right and put democracy to work. Not everyone in the world can enjoy this luxury.

-Lik

作者: Obama 時間: 2008-12-1 23:59 標題: Democracy

Does anyone know what true democracy is?
Stephen Harper is a goner. He made the one big stupid move.
He went after the pocket books of his political opponents.

作者: soli 時間: 2008-12-2 00:00

民主國家從來都是吵得最大聲(並非人數最多)的人有糖吃﹐阿力哥果然理解箇中道理。
但這樣算不算乎合民主精神﹐就很見仁見智了~

作者: Lik 時間: 2008-12-2 00:04

原帖由 soli 於 2008-12-1 21:31 發表
我沒有投票給保守黨﹐大部份加拿大人亦跟我一樣。如果代表大部份加拿大人既政黨反對保守黨繼續執政﹐少數服從多數﹐將保守黨拉下來有何不可﹐而且這是憲法所允許的。

保守黨在競選時期沒有提出任何挽救經濟的措施﹐執政後也漠視其他政黨對刺激經濟的要求﹐獨斷獨行。一個少數政府﹐如果一直不能跟其他政黨合作﹐繼續執政下去﹐對加拿大又有甚麼好處呢?

Soli,

You are quite correct here. As the Opposition to the minority government, the Liberals, NDP, and Bloc have every right to vote down the Conservative minority via a vote of non-confidence. As written in my letter to the GG, I welcome them to exercise the power that Canadians have bestowed them.

However, I am protesting against the Liberal-NDP coalition government that was brokered behind closed doors between the sore-losing Liberals and the ever-opportunistic NDP. It is obvious that for 6 weeks, they have accepted their role as the opposition and recognized Harper and the Conservatives as the PM and the governing party. The dust has settled, and that's that! Had they made the coalition government proposal to GG Jean 6 hours after the Oct 14 election results were in, there might have been some degree of legitimacy to their proposal. Heck, had GG Jean offered government to this coalition at that time instead of handing it to the Conservatives, I might be inclined to accept it as well. But to cry foul now and attempt to sneak a coalition government in to replace the Conservatives shows how little they respect the rules of the Canadian democratic system.

To make matters worse, the coalition proposal wants to instate Dion as our lame duck PM for 5 months, after which the PM seat would be determined by the Liberals leadership race, as opposed to by Canadians in general. I just have to ask -- just since when did Canadians allow a selected group of people to choose our prime minister for us? As I recall, Canada is a country that practices universal suffrage.

-Lik

作者: soli 時間: 2008-12-2 00:23

很奇怪呢~
如果在選舉結束後﹐自由黨和新民主黨立刻申請要成立聯合政府﹐會得到魁人黨的支持嗎? 不會吧~
為甚麼現在就可以呢?
是保守黨執政後太自大和卑鄙了﹐可惡得在國會裡得不到任何其他反對黨的支持。
總合我上面所說﹐說組聯合政府合情合理兼合法。
合法者﹐乎合加拿大憲法。
合情: 保守黨欺人太甚﹐反對黨派乃狗急跳場而已~
合理者﹐經濟環境改變﹐右派政權倒台乃大勢所趨﹐而聯合政府所代表的是過半數加拿大人﹐這正正體現了少數服從多數的民主精神。

[ 本帖最後由 soli 於 2008-12-2 01:25 編輯 ]

作者: Lik 時間: 2008-12-2 00:33

原帖由 soli 於 2008-12-1 21:55 發表
這次金融海嘯﹐讓自由市場主義再次破產。為挽救經濟﹐各國政府經濟政策也向左傾斜﹐連號稱最自由經濟體﹐失業率還在4%以下的香港﹐也保證不削減政府開支﹐避免增加任何對經濟不利的因素。

偏偏有我們的保守黨﹐基於意識形態的限制﹐遲遲未能對現在惡劣的經濟環境作出任何適當反應﹐只懂賤賣國家資產﹐削減開支這些右派技倆(即不干預市場)﹐逆天而行。更以削減開支作為打擊政敵的籍口﹐以本傷人﹐令其跟其他政黨的合空間完全消失。

所以這次反對黨派要聯手推倒保守黨﹐絕對合情合理兼合法。很多人害怕政局不穩定﹐但兩害相權取其輕。若保守黨繼續執政﹐亦只會是一跛腳鴨政府﹐難以應付目前經濟環境。自由黨的理財能手不少﹐在經濟措施方面﹐我對自由黨帶領下的聯合政府更具信心~

Soli,

I hate to say this, but your post reveals how little understanding you have towards the Canadian economy. While the US recession will invariably drag the Canadian economy down to a certain extent, Canada is in a far better shape than the US is. The Canadian financial system remains strong, and in particular, our banking system is in a far better shape than what the US is struggling with. As a matter of fact, experts agree that among the G20, Canada is arguably in the best financial shape. Just because the US is throwing money every which way doesn't mean we have to do the same thing. More importantly, just because the US can afford to do this doesn't mean Canada can -- like it or not, the USD is the world currency, and that means the Feds has a licence to print money. The Bank of Canada, unfortunately, is not the Feds.

The "coalition" government's proposal to help the Canadian auto manufacturing sector completely misses the point as well. The Big 2.5's are shutting down plants left and right because the cars these plants make are not selling down in the US. What good does it do for Canada when this coalition government wants to keep these plants open? The Big 2.5 needs a re-structring plan coming straight from Detroit, not money from the Canadian government to keep uncompetitive plants open.

Once again, Soli, do not mislead others into thinking that the coalition government proposal is legitimate. No Canadian should challenge the Opposition's right to vote down the Conservative minority government, but the coalition government proposal is a completely separate issue. Canadians need to choose who our governing party and who are Prime Minister are, and as far as my 6-week memory can remember, Canadians as a whole has chosen the Conservatives and Stephen Harper to lead this country. We did not choose to instate a Liberal-NDP coalition government, nor were they invited to govern by the Governor General. We did not choose Mr. Dion to be our PM for 5 months, only to be replaced by a Liberal candidate that we have no say in choosing. To go along with the coalition government proposal will inflict a severely damaging wound to the Canadian democratic system.

So go ahead and vote the government down. Take us to the polls once again and let Canadians from coast to coast decide who will be our country's leader and governing party.

-Lik

作者: Lik 時間: 2008-12-2 00:41

原帖由 soli 於 2008-12-2 00:23 發表
很奇怪呢~
如果在選舉結束後﹐自由黨和新民主黨立刻申請要成立聯合政府﹐會得到魁人黨的支持嗎? 不會吧~
為甚麼現在就可以呢?
是保守黨執政後太自大和卑鄙了﹐可惡得在國會裡得不到任何其他反對黨的支持。
總合我上面所說﹐說組聯合政府合情合理兼合法。
合法者﹐乎合加拿大憲法。
合情: 保守黨欺人太甚﹐反對黨派乃狗急跳場而已~
合理者﹐經濟環境改變﹐右派政權倒台乃大勢所趨﹐而聯合政府所代表的是過半數加拿大人﹐這正正體現了少數服從多數的民主精神。

I wonder how you can jump to the conclusion that the coalition government proposal can be legitimate now.

As I have mentioned already, the Opposition has every right to overthrown the Conservative minority government. This was written into the law books, and is the rules that everyone abides by.

On the other hand, to put forth a coalition government proposal 6 weeks after the Conservative government is re-instated is playing against the rules. The Liberals and the NDP have already accept their role as the opposition. And now they want to turn the tables?! How does that ever have any legitimacy?

As an example, Soli, I suggest that you try signing a contract now, only to breach it 6 weeks later. Does the other signing party have the right to sue you for damages? You bet they do.

-Lik

作者: yayaya 時間: 2008-12-2 02:22

lol, welcome back

作者: maiamcy 時間: 2008-12-2 08:10 標題: 回復 30# 的帖子

100% agree. They have to restructing instead. Their sales are down because their products ARE NOT selling!!

The "coalition" government's proposal to help the Canadian auto manufacturing sector completely misses the point as well. The Big 2.5's are shutting down plants left and right because the cars these plants make are not selling down in the US. What good does it do for Canada when this coalition government wants to keep these plants open? The Big 2.5 needs a re-structring plan coming straight from Detroit, not money from the Canadian government to keep uncompetitive plants open.

作者: bbqfish 時間: 2008-12-2 08:41

well, at least this government lasts for 6 weeks. the shortest in canadian history was 1 day. Maybe liberal and NDP wants to create jobs such as election clerks, election officers, making more banners, printed pamphlets, news reporters...etc.

作者: daimo 時間: 2008-12-2 08:43

if a coalition government will come, it won't last very long anyway. So if the election $ is to be spent, might as well do it earlier.

作者: low_B 時間: 2008-12-2 08:47

So. what else we can do?

作者: sheep 時間: 2008-12-2 08:56

I wonder if "coalition" government is formed, in what way we can bring it down? No way I think.
Call another election is the best way.

作者: ACC-HE 時間: 2008-12-2 11:14

News1130's Listener Poll
(current result)

作者: siumaibb 時間: 2008-12-2 11:41

OMG, Lik is back, welcome and I support your view......Liberal & NDP are shameless losers

作者: BiscottiGelato 時間: 2008-12-2 11:50

原帖由 soli 於 2008-12-1 23:09 發表
那 BiscottiGelato 即認為現在政府應該甚麼也不用做。大企業銀行要倒就讓他們倒﹐失業率上升就讓他升﹐政府收入少了﹐就削減開支﹐帶頭裁減公務員﹐加稅。等到大家跳樓的跳樓﹐燒炭的燒炭。重複看兒子欠債砍母親﹐失業父親殺全家後 ...

Stuffing words in my mouth doesn't gain you any credibility. I am merely saying there are two sides to the argument. Economic stimulation is not the only way that might solve the problem. It might make it worse. Did I ever say the government should do nothing? I just said that they shouldn't try to solve the problem by using lowly economic stimulation strategy like the US has.

People are hungry now doesn't mean you should just buy food for them. You can reduce government spending, thus reducing tax on both corporate and the people, allowing higher productive to increase things like exports, which actually increase the value of both the dollar, foreign reserve, foreign investment and thus ultimately lead to domestic wealth and job creation. This comparitively is a slower method, but it's the sustainable method. How much unnecassary jobs can the government afford to pay out of it's own account? I am just saying the government should do whatever it always have been doing, but also tighten up their spending to reduce taxes on categories that allow for more competitive climate for business and hirings. I am encouraging the government to employ long term sustainable approaches as opposed to stupid method that only focuses on instant gratification.

Even tho yes, I agree that most people just look at the jobless rate for the next month and the GDP for the next year. But a responsible government should have a longer outlook than that. Contracting government spending is definately a great start so the government have more bullets to place money at the right places and if anything, to at least not go back into a red bottomline.

作者: zoids 時間: 2008-12-2 16:19

Oh fuck, Lik is BACK! Here we go again....... history will repeat itself once more.

作者: shutterbug 時間: 2008-12-2 17:55

原帖由 zoids 於 2008-12-2 17:19 發表
Oh ****, Lik is BACK! Here we go again....... history will repeat itself once more.

do you swearing in 無人駕駛 la...this is 時事區 ah buddy...

Lik gor likes to eat "return grass" ma...

作者: ACC-HE 時間: 2008-12-2 23:16

I HATE Stéphane Dion! I HATE Stéphane Dion! I HATE Stéphane Dion! I HATE Stéphane Dion! I HATE Stéphane Dion! I HATE Stéphane Dion! I HATE Stéphane Dion! I HATE Stéphane Dion! I HATE Stéphane Dion! I HATE Stéphane Dion! I HATE Stéphane Dion! I HATE Stéphane Dion! I HATE Stéphane Dion! I HATE Stéphane Dion! I HATE Stéphane Dion! I HATE Stéphane Dion! I HATE Stéphane Dion! I HATE Stéphane Dion! I HATE Stéphane Dion! I HATE Stéphane Dion! I HATE Stéphane Dion! I HATE Stéphane Dion! I HATE Stéphane Dion! I HATE Stéphane Dion! I HATE Stéphane Dion! I HATE Stéphane Dion! I HATE Stéphane Dion! I HATE Stéphane Dion! I HATE Stéphane Dion! I HATE Stéphane Dion! I HATE Stéphane Dion! I HATE Stéphane Dion! I HATE Stéphane Dion! I HATE Stéphane Dion! I HATE Stéphane Dion! I HATE Stéphane Dion! I HATE Stéphane Dion! I HATE Stéphane Dion! I HATE Stéphane Dion! I HATE Stéphane Dion! I HATE Stéphane Dion! I HATE Stéphane Dion! I HATE Stéphane Dion! I HATE Stéphane Dion! I HATE Stéphane Dion! I HATE Stéphane Dion! I HATE Stéphane Dion! I HATE Stéphane Dion!

WHAT A DUMBASS!

[ 本帖最後由 ACC-HE 於 2008-12-3 00:18 編輯 ]

作者: MyOMy 時間: 2008-12-3 00:26

咁大仇口？不過用啲咁下三濫嘅招數奪權, 就算得咗, 第二個自由党領上場就陰公啦, 回為你曾在選民头上拉矢, 人心定當向背, 肯定有排無運行。

新民主党林頓對佢印象很好, 清新正直, 嗰党慢慢經營應該好好, 但今次咁攪, 就露出狐狸尾巴。

各位亦無須咁慶, 邊嗰做都差唔多, 所謂刺激經济又係救吓車廠, 林木業, 做多幾個大工程, 財散咪大家安樂囉。歷史上數一數二剌激經濟嘅羅斯福新政又唔係無用, 其实經濟係比二次大戰救番。否極就泰來。

不過有一點最唔老嚟嘅就係救車廠。救林木業, 銀行, 乜Q 都要係加拿大企業至啱波路。揾加拿大稅去救美國企業, 我都啉唔到嗰Logic係邊。又話成個行業連鎖反應幾十万人無得撈, 唔通唔賣美國車就乜車都唔駛賣唔駛整？

作者: 快樂牛郎 時間: 2008-12-3 00:37

原帖由 MyOMy 於 2008/12/3 00:26 發表
又話成個行業連鎖反應幾十万人無得撈, 唔通唔賣美國車就乜車都唔駛賣唔駛整？

車梗係繼續賣
不過唔係你賣
係日本賣

作者: daimo 時間: 2008-12-3 15:23

原帖由 ACC-HE 於 2008-12-3 00:16 發表
I HATE Stéphane Dion! I HATE Stéphane Dion! I HATE Stéphane Dion! I HATE Stéphane Dion! I HATE Stéphane Dion! I HATE Stéphane Dion! I HATE Stéphane Dion! I HATE Stéphane Dion! I HATE Stéphane ...

he just wants to have a taste of being a PM before his career ends.

作者: ACC-HE 時間: 2008-12-3 19:01

I think he needs to speak English better before he can get majority of the vote! Listening to him speaking English, I just wanna snap his face! (or change channel, or mute...)

作者: Littleprince 時間: 2008-12-3 22:02

果然是力哥真身再現。。。
許久沒見﹐抱抱~~~~

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2008-12-3 22:09

其實, 天下烏鴉都係一樣黑.

力哥終於都番黎, 希望佢可以活躍d 啦, 我都好掛住佢~

作者: spoonek4 時間: 2008-12-4 06:36

原帖由 mcjohnjohn 於 2008-12-3 23:09 發表
其實, 天下烏鴉都係一樣黑.

邊個唔係志在搵著數丫﹖理得你出面班人死.....

三日唔埋兩日就話換政府，我頂！

作者: bbqfish 時間: 2008-12-4 07:00

NDP攪經濟?? 我覺得好極有限. 雖然財長會是LIBERAL的人,但如果NDP不點頭, 什麼也做不了.
仲有希望大家多多向政客,傳播界表達意見.

作者: Lik 時間: 2008-12-4 08:58

I wrote to all the MPs earlier in the week, and among the typical Conservative platform responses that I got back from many of them, I found John Weston's reply to be the most substantial. (John is the Conservative MP of West Van, Sunshine Coast, and Sea-to-Sky region.)

In his email reply, he said the following:

原帖由 John Weston
Finally, if Liberals suggest this Conservative government is not legitimate because it did not receive 50% of the popular vote, I would remind them that no Liberal government in Canadian history has ever received 50% of the vote (that has only happened twice – by Conservatives in 1958 and 1984), and I can’t remember Liberals ever suggesting that the three majority governments won by Jean Chretien in 1993, 1997 and 2000 with 41.3%, 38.5% and 40.8% of the vote, respectively, were somehow less than legitimate.

For more than 140 years, despite the fact that parties almost never get 50% of the popular vote, our parliamentary system has produced stable and legitimate governments. In my view, this is not a weakness of our system. It is an enviable record of balancing three principles necessary for any successful electoral system – democracy, legitimacy and stability.

With such obvious lies, It is clear to me that the Liberals are only interested in playing political games and finding ways to put their own interests ahead of those from Canadians. Shame on these hypocritic scumbags!!!

For those who are buying into the argument that the coalition deserves to take government because they received the majority of Canadians' votes, are you still supporting their cause in the face of this blatantly obvious lie?

-Lik

作者: somewhereintime 時間: 2008-12-4 09:02

So we have 6 weeks cool down period, until the next budget

作者: sheep 時間: 2008-12-4 10:00

哈仔一番話
後遺症 .............. 魁獨重臨

作者: CWong 時間: 2008-12-5 06:16

林顿老奸巨滑，要自由黨出头搞垮个政府！让狄安做罪人！

作者: sheep 時間: 2008-12-5 09:30

休會扣人工兩個月冇糧出
如果大選我諗本地印裔自由人會轉黨為新民主人

[ 本帖最後由 sheep 於 2008-12-5 10:34 編輯 ]

作者: MyOMy 時間: 2008-12-5 09:38

原帖由 sheep 於 2008-12-5 10:30 發表
休會扣人工兩個月冇糧出
如果大選我諗本地印裔自由人會轉黨為新民主人

你講烏遭到生滋 ?

作者: sheep 時間: 2008-12-5 09:53

係掃你果個大能鑊
亦都唔排除呢個可能

[ 本帖最後由 sheep 於 2008-12-5 10:55 編輯 ]

作者: MyOMy 時間: 2008-12-5 10:09

點会呀, 佢出哂面支持联盟都係想撈番過部長, 轉党就部表未必有得做, 玩吓手, 重新大選, 输比袁女士都唔定。佢机心咁重, 金手指過簡瓜年都係想坐正, 又睇吓佢點鼓動印裔人士就知佢勁有机心, 千祈唔好比佢嘅道貌岸然外殼欺騙。如果你認為佢会轉, 我睇無乜可能。所以係無大檸樂。

歡迎光臨溫哥華老友記討論區 (http://www.loyaukee.com/forum/)