溫哥華老友記討論區 - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: 正版名牌與翻版名牌 [打印本頁]

作者: cecity 時間: 2009-3-24 22:12 標題: 正版名牌與翻版名牌

成日見到好多人咩牌子手袋,LV GUCCI COACH CHANEL......應有盡有.不過,究竟有幾多人系咩正版,幾多系咩翻版,吾知!!覺得好可笑,有D人花幾百甚至幾千去買個正版手袋,有D花百領蚊去買個翻版,根本大多數人都吾識分0既,以假亂真!!!搞到D名牌好似好cheap

,人有我有咁!!!比你柬,你買正定翻版

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2009-3-24 22:20

我一定分唔到正版定翻版, 而我就正版同翻版都唔會買.

作者: 小叻 時間: 2009-3-24 22:22

正版翻版都唔買~ 因為我個人有tastes~ 唔跟風既~ 正所謂“修養既差別”

作者: 大C姐 時間: 2009-3-24 22:26

有個智者話﹐你囉個A貨都有人覺得係真你先好買名牌。

真係呢個世界你買第一個A貨開始﹐你就無得返轉頭。一日A貨一世A貨﹐無人會覺得你再買果D係真野。當然有D人係唔care﹐覺得買到平野好抵用。但係如果買個袋係為左威﹐為左有虛榮心同令人覺得你有品味或消費能力的話﹐買A貨就完全係contradiction囉。

盡管A貨係好真﹐冒稱果D款都出奇地老土。衰D講句﹐假假地半個時裝界﹐真果個款都根本唔會買得落手著得上身。再平﹐再真﹐料再堅﹐你話係偷出黎賊裝3折俾我﹐我都唔會覺得個袋靚﹐同增強到我自信囉。

如果有人大聲覺得唔care牌子﹐覺得好自信﹐帶咩都得﹐點解要買個擺到明名牌﹐但係個款又唔係特別﹐又唔係平既假袋? 好明顯﹐呢個世界買A貨果D都唔係自信心強﹐都係果D滿足自己虛榮人有我有﹐鍾意買減價唔理靚唔靚既消費者囉。

-- 大C姐

作者: Catpiano 時間: 2009-3-24 22:29

Well .. problem is .. as long as you are asian ... white people will THINK you are using "A" products ga la..

( oops.. I am not mr T )

However, as big C sister said, depends how you match up ..  with nice dress, or nice suit .. even with AA .. people think you use REAL stuff la...  ^_^

I got few LV from last 20 yrs .. some are real .. some are fake ..  doesn't matter now la...

作者: cecity 時間: 2009-3-24 22:38

同意，我都覺得Ｄ款冇乜特別。。。全部一樣

作者: 大C姐 時間: 2009-3-24 22:42

我作風一向係唔著任何明顯大牌子。

唔係話我好有taste﹐而係我唔覺得有多個label喺心口會加強信心。我著果D衫好多一係無牌子﹐一係就普通人讀都未必識讀果D。

大大個名牌袋都好out﹐真係唔該唔好再大搖大擺﹐行過fing個袋荒死人唔知你果個係過氣YSL。連去洗手間都要拎埋去﹐驚坐埋邊見唔到。呢D真係囉膽﹐但係又好港女。

-- 勢死不做港女大C姐

作者: tofu 時間: 2009-3-24 22:48

ms. lau bo wing kim said she is happy to use A貨, because no one can really tell. or no one will think she is using A貨

如果有能力個款又喜歡, why not. 名牌 has better quality control.

作者: cecity 時間: 2009-3-24 22:49

我作風一向係唔著任何明顯大牌子。

唔係話我好有taste﹐而係我唔覺得有多個label喺心口會加強信心。我著果D衫好多一係無牌子﹐一係就普通人讀都未必識讀果D。

大大個名牌袋都好out﹐真係唔該唔好再大搖大擺﹐行過f ...
大C姐發表於 2009-3-24 23:42

大Ｃ姐，好型

作者: pc2426 時間: 2009-3-25 00:56

for me i dont buy both
if u carring a purse that ppl will think are u carring a real or fake one, y just dont go and buy some with stylish purse like nine west, tumi brand like that..
ppl will think they are nice too
for me i think style is more important than brand

作者: peter236 時間: 2009-3-25 01:15

We should not chase these foreign brand names. Instead we should promote our own Chinese brand names and then set up flagship stores all over the world.

作者: katamari 時間: 2009-3-25 01:33

不會買Ａ貨，亦不會買周街都有個Ｄ名牌款i.e speedy, neverfull或者一睇就知為個label而買既style. 一街都係個Ｄ款一係就Ａ貨，一係就係入門貨式$1000有找。

有錢又唔係用成大半個月人工去買個袋個Ｄ人跟本連真貨既大路款都覺得 cheap啦！

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2009-3-25 01:36

We should not chase these foreign brand names. Instead we should promote our own Chinese brand names and then set up flagship stores all over the world.
peter236 發表於 2009-3-25 17:15

小弟好記得讀小學既時候貪平而買左國產既<<公雞牌>>墨汁寫大字.
結果, 一倒出黎就發出一陣陣惡臭, 成個班房都臭哂!!!
經此一役, 我向所有同學promote 了<<公雞牌>>墨汁的特點...

不過, 有彈有讚, <<中華牌>>鉛筆真係又平又好用既.

作者: peter236 時間: 2009-3-25 01:45

本帖最後由 peter236 於 2009-3-25 02:46 編輯

mcjohnjohn, if you hate Chinese stuff so much, you can come back here.
We should buy more Chinese brand name handbags rather than those boring French or Italian bags

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2009-3-25 01:57

mcjohnjohn, if you hate Chinese stuff so much, you can come back here.
We should buy more Chinese brand name handbags rather than those boring French or Italian bags
peter236 發表於 2009-3-25 17:45

我又讚<<中華牌>>鉛筆架, 你唔係睇唔到卦...

作者: Ultraman 時間: 2009-3-25 02:09

First, buying "A-goods" is not a Chinese-only-privilege, I know some Caucasians are using and like to buy "A-goods" too (even French people).

And second, the intention of buying/using genuine branded names products doesn't necessary to show off to others, but for personal satisfaction and enjoyment. If you (a general "you") are using an authentic handbag/purse, why care/bother and need to guess if other people would think the bag you're using is an authentic or a fake one?

作者: katamari 時間: 2009-3-25 02:25

First, buying "A-goods" is not a Chinese-only-privilege, I know some Caucasians are using and like to buy "A-goods" too (even French people).

And second, the intention of buying/using genuine branded ...
Ultraman 發表於 2009-3-25 03:09

Check craigslist and you'll know how many caucasians selling replicas.

作者: somewhereintime 時間: 2009-3-25 07:01

10# pc2426
I know a very rich lady, she keeps wearing a impeccable 2 carats diamond ring,
and whenever people ask, she would say it's fake, but everyone know
she is rich no matter what she wear, even a piece of glass.

作者: B仔 時間: 2009-3-25 07:51

細個冇錢都有買一兩個假嘅名牌。大個左，自己買真貨，好有滿足感。

當然，我唔係盲目咁買，買D成街都有個D款，或買好容易有老翻嘅款啦～同埋，我係好AGAINST個D成副身家達哂上身個D冇TASTE女仔啦～我唔係日日都拿著個靚袋個D，係間唔中先用，著到靚靚襯哂咁啦～

作者: myversa 時間: 2009-3-25 07:54

First, buying "A-goods" is not a Chinese-only-privilege, I know some Caucasians are using and like to buy "A-goods" too (even French people).

Yes, in Malaysia a famous place selling those A-Goods, you can see a lot of Caucasians there arguing the price. They might be from Canada, Australia or Europe that I do not know.

作者: myversa 時間: 2009-3-25 07:55

For my wife, her theory is if we can afford it we will buy real one; if we cannot afford it, we do not buy it at all; she does not like A-Goods nor do I.

作者: 布小熊 時間: 2009-3-25 09:16

21# myversa
Sorta same for me... I never buy A-Goods. If I buy, it will be the real one.
Also if I buy a brand name bag, I usually like the style with less noticable logo. never like any monogram ones...
as my friend in HK said, we will only buy a brand name if the cost is less than 10% of our pay cheque.

作者: sheep 時間: 2009-3-25 09:30

I still remember when I was wearing a brand named pull over walking on the streets in Japan.
Someone came up to me and ask me : " how much you are paid to wear this?"
After that, I wear and buy everything without any logo.

作者: habitrailspace 時間: 2009-3-25 09:33

doesn't matter genuine or fake
101% show off

作者: tsumorichisato 時間: 2009-3-25 10:10

最好笑有時d friend 會懶醒攞住個假野名牌週圍問人似唔似真野, 好自豪架

作者: alai 時間: 2009-3-25 10:27 標題: RE: 正版名牌與翻版名牌

細個冇錢都有買一兩個假嘅名牌。大個左，自己買真貨，好有滿足感。

當然，我唔係盲目咁買，買D成街都有個D款，或買好容易有老翻嘅款啦～同埋，我係好AGAINST個D成副身家達哂上身個D冇TASTE女仔啦～我唔係日 ...
B仔發表於 2009-3-25 08:51

totally agree with you ... sometime bought those 名牌 bags and clothing are for personal satisfaction. Just want to treat ourself good only after damn hard working in office

作者: 小叻 時間: 2009-3-25 10:40

Instead of buying handbags... I will buy myself nice clothes & accessories to treat myself

作者: B仔 時間: 2009-3-25 10:46

totally agree with you ... sometime bought those 名牌 bags and clothing are for personal satisfaction. Just want to treat ourself good only after damn hard working in office
alai 發表於 2009-3-25 11:27

我自己買我嘅袋，拿出嚟個種心態就真係叫自豪～

同埋，唔係話平野唔STYLISH，貴野一DD係唔值，又冇款，料又差。。。
不過，好多貴野，係好STYLISH，真係賣DESIGN同QUALITY。無可否認。

襯得靚，係一種技巧，好多人做唔到架囉～唔係話衫著人袋襯人。。。你拿得出嚟，你個格都唔襯（唔係話要囂）。。。即係個D運動裝C9拿LV／CHANEL，靚妹拿BV咁嘅道理～

作者: Yui 時間: 2009-3-25 11:00

有一個階段我好鍾意名牌手袋，真係買到收吾到手．自問吾係有錢人，但手頭一有錢就會為買而買，病態購物．又以熟識手袋系列名稱為榮，膚淺無聊．

不過好采只係短暫，我覺得就好似係個段時間內買了我十年內買手袋既ｑｕｏｔａ．

這兩年我對名牌手袋既看法改變左，自問能分辨真假，看見街上形形式式既大小真假名牌，結論只有一個：俗不可耐．　　

作者: B仔 時間: 2009-3-25 11:37

29# Yui
我冇你果時咁嚴重。。。
我都係見到靚，先會心郁。不過係要我好好好好好好好鍾意我先會扑鎚～
太貴OUT OF RANGE個D我只會睇同恨～係我可、能力範圍內個D我會諗清楚好耐，睇幾次先會買。
我試過望住一個限量CHANEL袋好好好耐，睇咗好好好多次，結果冇買。。。因為夠我同愛人去10日旅行～而家要供兩層樓，視線轉了整靚屋企，我又冇係DOWNTOWN返工了，所以冇買好耐。（加上D款又唔靚）

作者: Rainy 時間: 2009-3-25 11:45

自己睇自己... 我以前買唔起.. 我零願唔買.....
不過現在一樣買唔起.... 但識左有d friends..... 某名牌可以有 discounts... 0甘先買左兩個袋... =)
不過呢, 正價我一定唔會買, 因為學B仔0甘講, 可以 enough for 10日旅行囉..... I rather enjoy my 旅行 more than carrying a designer bag which 成日都會轉款..... 點追得切 wor.......

作者: katamari 時間: 2009-3-25 12:08

本帖最後由 katamari 於 2009-3-25 13:09 編輯

21# myversa
Sorta same for me... I never buy A-Goods. If I buy, it will be the real one.
Also if I buy a brand name bag, I usually like the style with less noticable logo. never like any monogram o ...
布小熊發表於 2009-3-25 10:16

同意。如果收入高的人，買名牌的消費好可能好似普通人買對aldo gum，好似多數人去superstore，都有人去urban fare買送。Afford到的話對於呢Ｄ人名牌就唔算多餘，亦都唔會用來show咩off啦 (諸：除birkin外，冇咩邊個人拎birkin唔係為show off

）。唔係專登話邊個，話人用名牌乜乜物Ｄ人有大部分係吃不到的葡萄是酸的既心理。其實真係有好多afford得起既人，慘在呢Ｄ人比Ｄ mang車邊買名牌同用Ａ貨Ｄ人污染o者！

其實每個人都有自己消費理論，想要luxury或者享受都好ok，有Ｄ人喜好fine fining都使多過個袋啦！有Ｄ男人鍾意儲相機玩hi-fi啦，知不過呢Ｄ野唔係日日帶到去街知嘛，如果唔係Ｄ男人仲狼死呀！

都要怪Ｄ傳媒成日影到Ｄ名星拎住名牌袋仲要做文章，攪到Ｄ靚妹為要扮celebrities，唔食野做緩交賣底褲乜都做得出。見到呢類人就真係無眼睇。

作者: 布小熊 時間: 2009-3-25 12:21

其實每個人都有自己消費理論，想要luxury或者享受都好ok，有Ｄ人喜好fine fining都使多過個袋啦！有Ｄ男人鍾意儲相機玩hi-fi啦，知不過呢Ｄ野唔係日日帶到去街知嘛，如果唔係Ｄ男人仲狼死呀！ katamari 發表於 2009-3-25 12:08 PM

That's me. I can go fine dine and spent $600 for a meal but not that for a bag...

作者: katamari 時間: 2009-3-25 12:24

講件好笑事你地知。

我阿媽係一個唔熟讀名牌既人，拒上次朋友帶拒去大陸好唔小心買左個Bottega銀包番黎show比我睇，仲話貪拒間格好又平一口氣買左兩個！我話拒知拒傻更更買左假貨，笑死我！

的確係有Ｄc9會不知情之下買左假野，無姑姑比人笑拒扮有錢人。

話時話我真係唔信呢度gum清泉gum少人用Ａ貨喎！冇人出聲？

作者: katamari 時間: 2009-3-25 12:31

本帖最後由 katamari 於 2009-3-25 13:36 編輯

That's me. I can go fine dine and spent $600 for a meal but not that for a bag...
布小熊發表於 2009-3-25 13:21

right on!

我自己消費道理係，如果有安穩or more的收入，搵到錢係要享受既，最緊要係自己真係鍾意唔係跟風或者追潮流，有錢儲唔係揮霍，唔係要碌爆阿爸／老公／男友張card就得啦。我鍾意Ｄ錢使響邊唔使同外人交代，我使得起的話Ｄ錢唔通唔用咩。

我afford得起食好Ｄ著好Ｄ每年有旅行去，但係我唔會買好多化妝品做美容買成櫃衫同鞋，又唔渣benz，gum其實都係一條數0者。

作者: Yui 時間: 2009-3-25 13:00

30# B仔

係啊，所以係一個階段．當人大左而錢又有更值得用既地方，諸如儲首期，供樓，進修，旅行ｅｔｃ，無聊既物質就變得可有可無．

作者: katamari 時間: 2009-3-25 13:17

話時話同樣都會有人覺得去旅行係好奢侈

作者: B仔 時間: 2009-3-25 13:42

話時話同樣都會有人覺得去旅行係好奢侈
katamari 發表於 2009-3-25 14:17

縮骨嘅人，會覺得洗錢就係奢侈～

不過有就有，冇就唔好間硬吹話有囉。如果我冇錢，我咪唔買囉。我之前有個FRIEND，係咁洗，只係讀書，冇返工，條卡數唔係個個月還清。真係遲早死人淋友～

作者: katamari 時間: 2009-3-25 14:13

縮骨嘅人，會覺得洗錢就係奢侈～

不過有就有，冇就唔好間硬吹話有囉。如果我冇錢，我咪唔買囉。我之前有個FRIEND，係咁洗，只係讀書，冇返工，條卡數唔係個個月還清。真係遲早死人淋友～ ...
B仔發表於 2009-3-25 14:42

勒到條褲頭gum緊除非我面前有一個好好好大既目標要達到唔儲唔得，例如想兩三年內要買層樓唔做mortagage或者意外大左肚仲要三胞胎哈哈哈

同意，所以有咪睇下自己想點享受自己辛苦番來的成果。冇的話就唔好洗到gum盡，咪買Ａ貨來死充。

作者: B仔 時間: 2009-3-25 14:22

奇實，我地嚟一代，自認慳都好，其實都好奢侈。
你話唔買靚袋咩？咪一樣洗向第樣野～

以前個D就真係慳喇。老豆做野，老婆煮飯，住百幾呎嘅單位，閒閒地養四五件豆釘～

作者: 老友四號 時間: 2009-3-25 17:56

40# B仔
咪玩喇！將來係點唔知，今時今曰買中國手袋而唔買法國貨、意大利貨。

即使係民族情緒高漲都唔好咁離譜呀！同志！

作者: Littleprince 時間: 2009-3-25 19:35

本帖最後由 Littleprince 於 2009-3-25 20:37 編輯

其實點樣消費最緊要自己開心就得。。。錢係自己賺的﹐最緊要使得開心。

若果一個 C9 買左 A 貨而覺得人地看不出﹐自己滿足左虛榮心﹐都無乜壞丫 (當然﹐侵權呢D法律方面的問題﹐我們暫放一旁吧) 。。。儘管旁人可能會覺得好好笑。。。

當然我自己一定唔會買 A 貨﹐無錢的話寧願買無牌子的手袋﹐因為若是用左一定週身唔自在﹐兼入某D國家的境會比人捉﹐何必呢﹖

那些香港女仔用一﹐兩個月人工﹐唔食飯為左買個名牌袋傲視同齊﹐若她們自己覺得開心﹐犧牲得值得都無咩壞。。。同你用一﹐兩個月糧去一次旅行﹐我覺得本質上無咩分別﹐只係自己覺得滿足的東西不一樣而已﹐無所謂對錯。。。

作者: sheep 時間: 2009-3-25 20:35

40# B仔
咪玩喇！將來係點唔知，今時今曰買中國手袋而唔買法國貨、意大利貨。

即使係民族情緒高漲都唔好咁離譜呀！同志！
老友四號發表於 2009-3-25 18:56

點解唔係
邊个銷得多过我地既紅白藍膠袋?

作者: Ultraman 時間: 2009-3-25 20:40

其實點樣消費最緊要自己開心就得。。。錢係自己賺的﹐最緊要使得開心。

那些香港女仔用一﹐兩個月人工﹐唔食飯為左買個名牌袋傲視同齊﹐若她們自己覺得開心﹐犧牲得值得都無咩壞。。。同你用一﹐兩個月糧去一次旅行﹐我覺得本質上無咩分別﹐只係自己覺得滿足的東西不一樣而已﹐無所謂對錯。。。
Littleprince 發表於 2009-3-25 19:35

Well, if those gals only use their regular monthly salary, that's not too bad. The worst case is, they don't mind to sleep with strangers all because in return they can gain money to buy branded bags! Yet, I don't think there would be any gal sleeps with men for gaining money for travel lor. Nowadays moral ..... sigh......

作者: sheep 時間: 2009-3-25 20:51

一個願打一個願捱
交易泥啫

作者: Ultraman 時間: 2009-3-25 21:17

一個願打一個願捱
交易泥啫
sheep 發表於 2009-3-25 20:51

From a business POV, it really has nothing wrong for a fair deal accepted on both parties.
According to most moral standard, it's a "immoral trade".

作者: sheep 時間: 2009-3-25 21:22

Today, nobody cares.
The more you care, the result is UFO mind your own business.
If you are a parent, teach your children well.

作者: Ultraman 時間: 2009-3-25 21:26

Today, nobody cares.
The more you care, the result is UFO mind your own business.
If you are a parent, teach your children well.
sheep 發表於 2009-3-25 21:22

There you go! At least you agree as parents should teach their children well.

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2009-3-25 21:41

Well, if those gals only use their regular monthly salary, that's not too bad. The worst case is, they don't mind to sleep with strangers all because in return they can gain money to buy branded bags ...
Ultraman 發表於 2009-3-26 12:40

唔排除有女仔sleep with strangers 係為左養家的...

作者: 小叻 時間: 2009-3-25 21:49

唔排除有女仔sleep with strangers 係為左養家的...
mcjohnjohn 發表於 25-3-2009 21:41

I wonder 養咩家要養到sleep with strangers? @@

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2009-3-25 22:03

I wonder 養咩家要養到sleep with strangers? @@
小叻發表於 2009-3-26 13:49

睇報紙見到一d 新來港既女性, 比老公拋棄左, 為左養小朋友而去做妓女.

作者: katamari 時間: 2009-3-26 17:09

睇報紙見到一d 新來港既女性, 比老公拋棄左, 為左養小朋友而去做妓女.
mcjohnjohn 發表於 2009-3-25 23:03

你心地好快Ｄ去幫襯啦！

作者: tofu 時間: 2009-3-26 17:53

"""睇報紙見到一d 新來港既女性, 比老公拋棄左, 為左養小朋友而去做妓女."""

i believe it, but shouldn't be common
mostly are collecting welfare and get a cash job

作者: mcjohnjohn 時間: 2009-3-26 21:39

你心地好快Ｄ去幫襯啦！
katamari 發表於 2009-3-27 09:09

小弟做左三十年人有多, 真係一次都冇諗過去召妓...

作者: 老友四號 時間: 2009-3-27 18:41

11# peter236

咪玩喇！將來係點唔知，今時今曰買中國手袋而唔買法國貨、意大利貨。

即使係民族情緒高漲都唔好咁離譜呀！同志！

作者: 老友四號 時間: 2009-3-27 18:44

41# 老友四號
B仔：唔好意思搅錯咗！

作者: Littleprince 時間: 2009-3-27 19:03

41# 老友四號
B仔：唔好意思搅錯咗！
老友四號發表於 2009-3-27 19:44

你快D整個頭像喇﹐個個一樣樣好易搞錯架

作者: 老友四號 時間: 2009-3-27 19:07

57# Littleprince
咁妳係咪好想一睹老夫嘅御容先？

作者: Littleprince 時間: 2009-3-27 19:25

57# Littleprince
咁妳係咪好想一睹老夫嘅御容先？
老友四號發表於 2009-3-27 20:07

勁想

作者: 老友四號 時間: 2009-3-27 19:29

59# Littleprince
好！既然你係【勁】想；咁老夫一於＜勁＞考濾吓！

作者: RayRay 時間: 2009-3-28 00:19

Quality first.

歡迎光臨溫哥華老友記討論區 (http://www.loyaukee.com/forum/)