Board logo

標題: 在德黑蘭尋找真相 費勁又困難 [打印本頁]

作者: daimo    時間: 2009-6-22 11:46     標題: 在德黑蘭尋找真相 費勁又困難

History repeats.  How much do you trust the Western media?

http://news.mingpao.com/20090622/tab1.htm


"1/3時間用於否定假報道"

"「半狂想」網上新聞足以致命"

"真相永難知 伊朗的悲哀"
作者: rainbow-davie    時間: 2009-6-22 12:06

cnn is very bias.

so, i read BBC, sometimes CBC.. and mingpao, singtao, tw yahoo news, and sometimes, 半島.

多D唔同既source, 可以清楚唔同角度. 自己多D source 分析.
作者: chunsh    時間: 2009-6-22 12:09

cnn is very bias.

so, i read BBC, sometimes CBC.. and mingpao, singtao, tw yahoo news, and sometimes, 半島.

多D唔同既source, 可以清楚唔同角度. 自己多D source 分析.
rainbow-davie 發表於 2009-6-22 13:06

CNN唔係bias
不過如果話央視係中國政府既喉舌既話﹐CNN就係美國政府既"工具"o羅
作者: peter236    時間: 2009-6-22 12:16

CNN is even more stupid, at least CCTV is owned by the government, but CNN is not, so why do they voluntarily speak for the government? Could be special interests groups that pay them?
作者: puZZle    時間: 2009-6-22 13:37

US media are quite politically sided
作者: rainbow-davie    時間: 2009-6-22 17:04

CNN唔係bias
不過如果話央視係中國政府既喉舌既話﹐CNN就係美國政府既"工具"o羅
chunsh 發表於 2009-6-22 13:09


  true.. it is market driven.
作者: soli    時間: 2009-6-22 23:42

cnn is very bias.

so, i read BBC, sometimes CBC.. and mingpao, singtao, tw yahoo news, and sometimes, 半島.

多D唔同既source, 可以清楚唔同角度. 自己多D source 分析.
rainbow-davie 發表於 2009-6-22 13:06

哈哈﹐選擇性既唔同角度。




歡迎光臨 溫哥華老友記討論區 (http://www.loyaukee.com/forum/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2