Nonsense. Your men can have casual sex with their friends or neighbors next doors if they want, not necessarily related to 嫖妓 becomes legalized or not. To tie your men's heart is definitely not bas ...
Ultraman 發表於 2009-12-11 12:43
Don't be silly. The key concept was "as long as it doesn't harm anybody else". You count 殺人放火 doesn't harm anybody else? Cool.
Ultraman 發表於 2009-12-11 12:36
嫖妓又怎可以算為 "as long as it doesn't harm anybody else“呢﹖ 起碼傷害了他的另一半了﹐假設他有的話。。。再者﹐好多人嫖妓唔當個女人係人﹐只係工具﹐報紙成日都有講﹐甘咪傷害埋個妓女囉。
put aside those that are forced to be prostitutes..it will be another issue..but for your argument...they can choose to provide or not to provide and receive or not to receive sex service...you can ...
news 發表於 2009-12-11 13:20
oh did you missed this sentence? "但係當你無限上崗"
I don't mean to compare anything so your argument 並不成立﹐所以你話咩 COMPARE APPLE TO ORANGE 我先覺得奇怪﹐我有COMPARE 過咩野嗎﹖
If you want to talk about extreme or rare case. How about those church pastors sexual assault church fellows? Can I say going to church and believing in God is very dangerous so people rather not to ...
Ultraman 發表於 2009-12-11 13:25
Please stop talking and relating to more nonsense. Everyone can kill anyone even killing is surely illegal. Not limited to prostitute. Taxi drivers can kill their riders, so taxi should be illegalize ...
Ultraman 發表於 2009-12-11 13:45