本帖最後由 peter236 於 2010-6-1 14:49 編輯
你哋兩位媚共份子鍾意自我感覺良好嘅話，我當然唔會阻你。但作為一個電腦人，我就會話，以今時今日嘅電腦科 ...
Lik 發表於 2010-6-1 12:33 
Mr Lik, your comments is flawed as usual. You are just jealous of Chinese progress. On the surface, you are just attacking the CCP, which is understandable, but in fact you are a racist against the Chinese. To morons like you, every thing that Chinese people do is for face only.
It is important that China improves the living standards of the people and their scientific technology level at the same time. They are not mutually exclusive.
Your comments on "distributed computing" is totally laughable. If you know nothing about supercomputing, then just STFU rather than embarrassing yourself yet again. All the other countries are still building supercomputers, the US, Japan, Europe are all building more new supercomputers. Why else would they do it if there is no such need? This shows there is a need for these computers, unlike what you claimed.
While "distributed computing" is another way of doing it, but you are still distributing work among very power computers. According to the experts the costs are about the same, unlike what you claimed. You still need about the same number of microprocessors to produce about the same amount of computer power, whether they are located at the same location or distributed across disparate locations.
In the US, there are so many universities, government and research labs that have supercomputers. There are so many scientific applications for supercomputers.
All these supercomputers are already cooperating with each other by distributing work among themselves. These computer are getting cheaper to build all the time. Today's supercomputer will look slow compared with the supercomputers 5yrs or 10 yrs from now.
Lik, we talking about government and universities doing advanced scientific research here, not your computer at home running SETI or Prime95 while idling. |
發表於 2010-6-1 09:21
| 
