rockypath

南京彭宇案、天津許雲鶴案就係最好嘅例子。出於好心去幫人，之後仲要被人告返轉頭，而最荒謬嘅係，法院嘅判決竟然可以享明顯係證據不足嘅情況下判咗出於好心去幫人嘅有心人要負上部份刑責。連法律機器都話埋俾人民聽，你去幫人就只會惹禍上身，咁人民見死不救又有咩咁奇怪呢？
Lik 發表於 2011-10-15 23:13

這次我同意你觀點。 中國的法律和司法在形成這種社會風氣有推波助瀾的做用。 好心做好事的人得不到保護，那誰願意去冒風險呢？

兩個星期前有人問我如果我在街上看到人摔倒，我會不會扶他起來。 我說在加拿大我一定會，但在中國，我想我會猶豫。 要看當時的情形再決定。

rockypath

在可見嘅未來，我睇唔到任何理由情況會改善。只要共慘黨繼續執政，人治-亦即係無法無天嘅情況-只會繼續。 ...
Lik 發表於 2011-10-16 18:36

情況會改變而且是正在改變。 中國的司法也在改變。 以下是中國司法參考西方司法制度正在討論或已經開始進行改革。

１） 通過嚴刑逼供得到的證詞不能呈堂做證。 （這項應該是已經開始推行）

２） 證明嫌疑人有罪是檢控方的責任而不是嫌疑人的責任去證明自己無罪，疑點利益歸於嫌疑人。 （如果還沒有推行，應該是已經深入探討）

３） 建立陪審團制度以使司法得到人民監督。 （這個應該是在探討當中，但我相信將來是勢在必行）

我對中國司法不熟悉，如有錯誤，希望其他網友指正。

rockypath

以前我亦講過好多N次自毛賊東引發民革之後，有良心嘅人死嘅死、被鬥臭嘅被鬥臭，存活落來嘅有好多人都係道德敗壞之輩。而且民革一役，中華文化裡面嘅道德、倫理關係嚴重被撕裂、甚至被摧毀。良心、人性等等其實就係來自道德同倫理。共慘黨讓民革毀滅晒呢一切，咁試問唔怪佢又怪邊個呢？
Lik 發表於 2011-10-16 19:10

你應該注意到這裏沒有人為毛澤東辯護。我相信在史冊上毛澤東會將是與商紂和秦始王齊名的暴君。

但現在推翻共產黨是否就能解決問題？是否是對中國的發展和百姓的生活最佳的選擇？

如果你能回答一下經濟學第一年課程的練習題，你就能明白我在說什麼。

你花５千蚊買了一輛二手車，但每年你都要花２千５蚊去修車。 那你是應該繼續保留這輛車還是應該將它賣掉？

rockypath

Mainland China basically runs on the assumption that if you are caught by the police for something, ...
Lik 發表於 2011-10-17 09:32

Then you should learn more about it. You never heard about it does not mean it is not happening.

rockypath

你個example實在舉得太好，因為今日嘅天朝就正正係果架＄5千蚊嘅爛車！有常理嘅人、稍為會識得將目光放遠些少嘅都知道正確嘅做法係劏咗部車來買過部新。再唔係就算行路、搭巴士都好過你不停dum錢落去整呢個無底洞。當然，現存嘅既得利益者就會用盡一切手段去叫你繼續 keep 呢架爛車，而架爛車嘅司機、乘客就個個都驚無咗架爛車果三兩日會唔知點返工返學，所以就寧願不停繼續dum錢落去個黑洞。

Lik 發表於 2011-10-17 09:59

Your answer is what I well expected.

I believe many members on LYK would have taken first year economic, would anyone be kind enough to help Lik to understand and answer this question?


P.S.  Lik, the "car" question is a genuine exercise question from an economic textbook.  
The lack of economic knowledge should be one of the reasons why your view is so limited and narrow minded.

rockypath

Just b/c you say it doesn't mean it is happening either.
Lik 發表於 2011-10-17 09:59

This just shows you would rather continue to live in your own pit hole instead of observing the world changing.

rockypath

我又真係好有興趣聽吓你有啲乜野歪理咁巴閉呀？First year econ 喎？實際、行得通嘅話先再講啦？極其量咪 ...
Lik 發表於 2011-10-17 10:29

係唔係覺得自己好無面啊？  

呢Ｄ第一年經濟課的問題，就等那些高中剛畢業的小弟弟妹妹們來幫你。 或者是你借本書來自己看。 你能夠混到一本大學畢業文憑，這種簡單的入門知識應該難不倒你的。

但你是否有能夠以客觀態度看問題的能力、面對事實的勇氣和追求知識真理的願望，我就不敢擔保了。


Ｐ．Ｓ．  你的轉手賣車或是長ｈｏｌｄ和短揸的解釋於這個問題的理解和答案沒有關係。 是否又進一步覺得自己好無面啊？  

rockypath

If these egghead economists are all so smart, the US and the world wouldn't be in such deep trouble ...
Lik 發表於 2011-10-17 11:04

Hmm.... I believe we found the biggest egghead here.

Why don't you just shut up for a moment and spend the time and effort to find out what the question is and its answer before continuing to embarrass yourself publicly?

The "car" question is about the fundamental concept to be taught and repeated in the first three chapters of the first economic course.

Why don't you just read the first 3 chapters of the first economic course before BSing about the uselessness of economic theories?

rockypath

唔好講得咁口響
你冇適當訓練就去救人
冇事就冇事
有起事上來
個官會問你
您有冇得到人家嘅准許
先 ...
sheep 發表於 2011-10-17 12:05

Did you ever heard about the "Good Samaritan Act"?  I guess you have not.

You should have known me good enough that I do not BS based on nothing.

rockypath

你可以試吓
冇人會阻止你
我就聽過有人冇急救証書
去救人
結果因處理不當
就被人告
入咗 ...
sheep 發表於 2011-10-17 12:14

I suggest you read the act first before challenging me.

Why don't you guys do some homework before trying to challenge other people? It just embarrasses yourself publicly.