rockypath

唔怪得
啲弱智嘅
成日會笑嘅
sheep 發表於 2010-10-3 21:41

Shut up la. 左著晒你個金剛哥講野.

rockypath

回復  rockypath


   哎呀
你好嬲呀？
我無阻金剛哥
只係你要用盡全力去應付金剛哥
你應付唔到我嗟 ...
sheep 發表於 2010-10-3 21:55

我係中意玩你個金剛哥，你好嬲啊？  

rockypath

哎呀。。。救命啊，你的理解能力甘差噶

都话人地美国佬，法国佬，日本仔没有细路没饭吃，没书读，没瓦遮 ...
kingkong123 發表於 2010-10-3 22:12

Do you have trouble to understand what I ask?

Why do US and Japan not use billions after billions of tax payers’ money to eliminate the problem of poverty instead of wasting on the development of space technologies?  

呢Ｄ係唔係惘顧民生？

rockypath

俾人駁到正一正，自己斷到應一應就唯有借啲咦將自己嘅笨實輕輕帶過～ 本來我都唔想咁易就放過你㗎喇，但係 ...
Lik 發表於 2010-10-3 22:13

I will reserve a seat for you.

KO me? Yeah, I wish you and your friends have the ability to do so. Have you ever been able to challenged me?

rockypath

回復 62# soli

Let me play with KingKong la. I haven't had enough fun with him.

你插得錦勁，會唔會沒得繼續玩？

rockypath

美国，日本，法国的poverty的定义同中国的定义天差地别

因为美国佬，日本仔，法国佬解决了基本民生问题 ...
kingkong123 發表於 2010-10-3 22:53

I assume that you are saying US and Japan have no poverty and that is why they have the money to waste. Ok, I accept what you said even though it is not true.

So, why would US rather spend the money on space technologies instead of paying down its national debts?

Please don't run away. It is such a fun to play with you.

rockypath

Soli, do you still want to educate this 白癡?

如果沒有高科技部門，只有基礎教育部門，何來培養高科技人才?

First, I don't think he understood what you said.

Second, I believe he had never attended college or university himself. So he believe college graduates are 高科技人才. How stupid.

rockypath

一定play 你

美国佬的债务当然唔急住还啦，你地D人借钱给他使，唔还钱，你吹啊，最多米印多D给你

...
kingkong123 發表於 2010-10-3 23:15

Ok, I also accept what you said – US does not need to worry about its national debts.

So, what is your understanding of the significance of developing space technologies to countries like US and Japan which have billions and billions of tax payer’s money to waste?

Significance = 意義, in case you do not understand English.

rockypath

都唔知你向边个屎佛隆捐出来的，猪西都没人有

600万个大学生就叫搞好基础教育？ 这个只是一个数字 ...
kingkong123 發表於 2010-10-3 23:32

Are you saying - if China does not have a perfect education system, it shall not invest in developing space technologies?

rockypath

同你讲野都废的，同一问题兜兜转转

认真D睇返之前的帖啦，回答左你好久了 ...
kingkong123 發表於 2010-10-3 23:35

You only answer the reason why those countries could invest in space technologies - it is because they have no poverty, no worry for national debts and plenty of money to waste.

What I asked now is the significance of developing space technologies to those countries.

As I already said, I just worry that you don't understand what "significance" means.

Tell you again - "significance = 意義". Get it?

Ok, any thougth to share with me?