本帖最後由 rockypath 於 2011-11-28 12:18 編輯
What's your point in asking?
Both CPP and MPF are mandatory. The difference is, CPP is acceptable ...
Lik 發表於 2011-11-28 11:29 
First, CPP is just a pool of fund collected from Canadians. The fund is invested in market but not locked in safe. When the fund is invested, it is not risk-free as your friend claimed. Moreover, there is cost associated to the running (investing) of CPP as well. Don't try to tell me the cost (fee) charged for investing CPP is not considered profit of investing companies. Don't fool yourself that we are idiots.
Second, I do not see there is any association between the raise of contribution to MPF and the wealth disparity in Hong Kong. Why don't you do a pool on this forum and see how many people will agree with you?
Third, I would prefer to be able to control my CPP as MPF instead of letting the government has total control over how the CPP is invested and have no say on it.
BTW, Canada also raises the CPP contribution as well. Why do we not see you complain about that? |
發表於 2011-11-28 09:40
| 