rockypath

Topic like this is always a hot one. Just off the computer for a few hours and it is already page 7!

rockypath

講到宗教不得不聯想到這個

我以前是Christian
後來經過印尼排華之後就開始不相信
到911之後就開始覺得自己係傻仔了
Surreal 發表於 2009-12-1 20:43

George is an excellence entertainer and I enjoy watching his shows (I am trying to watch all his shows on Youtube.)

However, he is just making fun of relgion and I don't think he can convince me buying into his ideas.

In my opinion,

1) believing in NO GOD is also a religion since there is no proof that there is no god and people also "blindly" believe in it or accept it as a fact;

2) logically, there is more practical evidences to prove there is a god than there is no god.

BTW, do you mind to share why 911 makes you change?

rockypath

Why do we always talk about Christianity? Maybe Buddhism is an interesting topic as well.

rockypath

(No intention to start any fire at all.)
2. Why to believe there is a God is more logical? And even there is a God, why the Christianity God is more logical?Ultraman 發表於 2009-12-2 00:27

It is simple. If there is no god, then we need to believe everthing happened by chances (no plan, no design, no strucutre and no time line). However, the universe seems to be too complex for everything just happend by chance.

why do we have to have 2 hands, 2 legs, 2 eyes and 2 ears? why they are distributed so geometrically? why do other animals also have the same similar characters? it is just one example. there are too many examples we can list.

I didn't say Christianity God is more logical. Maybe we can talk about other religions as well.

rockypath

Why people only have 2 hands and 2 legs... but not 3 eyes and 4 hands....? Who knows if 3 eyes and 4 hands could be better? All because of we see human is like what we see now, but we can't conclude t ...
Ultraman 發表於 2009-12-2 02:44

I don't object what you are saying since they are reasonable and valid.

However, I think there are only two possibilities that we can choose from - 1) there is a god (or gods), 2) there is no god.

What we can do with our limitation is to put these two possibilities side by side and weight them. If there is concret proof, there is no point for us to discuss about it.