rockypath

Ok, I'll take your answer as:
The opportunity cost to sell the car is too high because of... whatever reason

Now, preicsely, what are those so called reasons that you claim? If you even dare to cite any one of them, I'll rebuke it with a counter argument so strong that it'll knock you out of your socks.

Lik 發表於 2011-10-17 14:51

懦夫就是懦夫。 你只會讓人更加瞧不起你。

我什麼時候告訴你問題的答案是要保留那輛車因為賣車的機會成本太高？

我早就告訴你答案不在於是賣還是保留。答案是如何去決定是賣還是保留那輛車。

你真是無可救藥了。   

rockypath

So that's your answer, huh? That the decision process to sell or keep the car amounts to too high an ...
Lik 發表於 2011-10-17 15:58

I appreciate your effort to answer the question with your common sense.

It just shows the difference between how people with economic knowledge and people without economic knowledge look at the same issue differently and the process of making decision and as well the principles they based on to form the decision differ from each other.

One more tip for you - "How are you going to look at the $5000 original purchase price? Should it affect your decision of keeping or selling the car?"  By the way, to make it easier, you can leave out the option of buying a new car (i.e. you cannot afford buying a new car).  
This is the last tip I will give you and it should be enough.  

rockypath

覺得rockypath煩的請舉手
有屁就真接放啦，你係老師定考官？
ricrick 發表於 2011-10-17 16:41

不如直接向Ａｄｍｉｎ告狀拉笨。

順你意就多多愈善，不順你意的就封殺。  共產黨的論壇管制之風似乎已經吹到這個論壇。

rockypath

Actually, I forgot to include a very important point that I was going to include, but have somehow  ...
Lik 發表於 2011-10-17 16:52

Don't change the question. The question does not to ask you whether you should keep the old car or buy a new car.  

What if I tell you the option of buying a new car is not available because you cannot afford buying a new car? Will that make you lose the target of answering the question?  

Can you focus back to the original question again?

rockypath

看你開始反共鳥，愚子可教

我想問下你平時講野，永遠第一句一定是“你知吾知我諗乜野？”
我會回問："你做乜諗野啊?"
ricrick 發表於 2011-10-17 17:08

首先，我沒有反共或挺共的立場。只不過是以事論事。

第二，你講Ｄ野都好無厘頭。 你又知道我平時如何講野？  我只不過是在幫助你們學習如何思考問題。

rockypath

i will still sell the car since there is no way the car can be fixed.i  will take the bus.. walk b ...
ricrick 發表於 2011-10-17 17:11

Of course, it can be an option. The only difference is whether it is the best option based on the economic principle.

rockypath

Hahahah~ Look at all this bs here~ Who is changing the question now, huh? Who? Answer me!!!

Seeing ...
Lik 發表於 2011-10-17 17:22

Can you leave the CPP out for a moment? It has nothing to do with CPP here. It is just a discussion of decision making process based on basic economic concepts.

Here is the question I asked and I re-post it here again.

你花５千蚊買了一輛二手車，但每年你都要花２千５蚊去修車。 那你是應該繼續保留這輛車還是應該將它賣掉？

Did I ask whether you should buy a new car? What about I ask you whether you should take bus or walk with your own feet instead? Even if you want to consider an option of buying a new car, it can be simplified and included in the option of selling the old car. Is it clear now?

So, is it clear now? You have two options - keeping or selling the car.   

To make my point clearer, I eliminate the option of buying a new car. Now, how are you going to make your decision?

P.S.  I would suggest you to call someone who just complete the first economic course instead of continuing embarrassing yourself publicly.

rockypath

呢條 thread 係講緊小悅悅點樣被啲無血性嘅天朝人撞親，然後仲要被人視而不見無人理。你響條thread度問得 ...
Lik 發表於 2011-10-17 17:51

Ok, if you have to bring CPP into the picture. Let's do it.

Just want to remind you - how did you come to the conclusion of overthrowing CPP now is the best option for China and mainland Chinese?

Do you find any similarity with the decision making of selling or buying an old car?

I bet you will say you found nothing.

That is ok and I believe I already get my message across.

rockypath

前七論並不成立，因為並沒有資料這廢車實質帶來什麼經濟效益，保不保留車子只是純粹感情上的決定。
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2011-10-17 18:14

看來如果我再試圖跟你們這些不學無術又不肯虛心學習的人講道理真是浪費時間和對牛彈琴。