Helissio

Dunno why ICBC decline her claim at the first place, she got injury in the car accident and she should get compensate no matter what’s her relation with the driver.

Helissio

dont get it.. why does the wife sue the husband? just to claim the awarded amount from icbc?
chocobun 發表於 2010-4-28 15:43

Basically yes. like what I said before, dunno why ICBC deny the wife's claim at the first place. imagine you were riding on your friends car and he hit a light pole (single car accdient) and it broke your leg, whould you sue the driver for compensation? same case here but its just the wife sueing her husband. and ICBC will pay because the husband got insurance and thats what insurance are for. and for the other guy said 疏忽駕駛罪名成立, it is true and it is not a crimal offend so no jail time, most likely he will get a $500 ticket for driving without care. (and cop always give out those ticket for single car accident)

Helissio

回復  Helissio


    based on what you said, if somebody drives a car carelessly and caused anythin ...
samsung 發表於 2010-4-28 19:42

Thats driving without care causing peoples death and thats a criminal offense, we are talking a single car accdient that no one got  injury seriously.
so what you are saying is if you hit a street pole in winter during snow time and the cop should send you to court and face criminal charges?