Ultraman

Well, this is the same "logic" when HK government said they can't stop illegal soccer gambling, and so the government hosts the legal gambling!

Ultraman

7# sheep


係喇係喇﹐殺人放火全部 LEGALIZED 更好﹐想做乜都可以做﹐兼無人犯法﹐天下太平﹐真好啊。。。
Littleprince 發表於 2009-12-10 13:12

Don't be silly. The key concept was "as long as it doesn't harm anybody else". You count 殺人放火 doesn't harm anybody else? Cool.

Ultraman

但係咁喎Moi哥，如果鐘意咗食大麻high嗰種feel，會唔會容易啲想試吓更high嘅feel呢？即係食啲強啲嘅丸仔呀，K仔嗰啲。
講到嫖妓，當然，係唔會physically傷到人，單身寡佬嫖妓都唔出奇。但係，如果呢樣嘢係合法，老 ...
fibbi 發表於 2009-12-10 20:05

Nonsense. Your men can have casual sex with their friends or neighbors next doors if they want, not necessarily related to 嫖妓 becomes legalized or not. To tie your men's heart is definitely not based on whether 嫖妓 is legal or not.

Ultraman

well.. I consider 嫖妓 better than 偷食添。。。

不過﹐我覺得嫖妓只適用於那些未婚﹐無女友﹐有性需要﹐又無其他方法解決的人。

若有老婆還嫖妓﹐其實都係 CHEATING 的一種。 ...
Littleprince 發表於 2009-12-11 11:48

True, which I also agree. But some people (ladies) tend to think too much. To legalize it doesn't turn non-interested guys to become interested all of a sudden if they have no such "gene" inside. Just like, same sex marriage is legalize won't turn regular men into gays. Or, eating **** is always legalized (I suppose), but not everybody will eat like the gals in two gals one cup. Right?
May I say, 嫖妓 legalized might be good for single men. But as I said, to tie your married men is nothing to do with whether the law is there or not. They will remain loyal to their women even it became legalized, if they're really loyal guys.

Ultraman

48# Ultraman


Yeah...guy may have genes for "call chicken" or cheating no matter what, but if things are illegal, they will "think twice" if they wanna do it, since there are bigger consequences (e ...
fibbi 發表於 2009-12-11 12:07

You missed out another fact (which most gals don't realize). Most guys like to enjoy the feel of "stealing". That means, they might enjoy calling chicken more when it's illegal; but once it's legal, they might feel less interest to do so.

Ultraman

嫖妓又怎可以算為 "as long as it doesn't harm anybody else“呢﹖ 起碼傷害了他的另一半了﹐假設他有的話。。。再者﹐好多人嫖妓唔當個女人係人﹐只係工具﹐報紙成日都有講﹐甘咪傷害埋個妓女囉。 ...
Littleprince 發表於 2009-12-11 12:11

Let's stick with single men but not married men. Then single men have no other half to hurt.
Second, if those men just pay and do the trade in a normal way, which involve no mental illness or violence kind of thing, the chickens are getting paid for what they ask for, considered a fair trade. Still no hurt.

Ultraman

再者﹐好多人嫖妓唔當個女人係人﹐只係工具﹐報紙成日都有講﹐甘咪傷害埋個妓女囉。 ...
Littleprince 發表於 2009-12-11 12:11

If you want to talk about extreme or rare case. How about those church pastors sexual assault church fellows? Can I say going to church and believing in God is very dangerous so people rather not to do so at all?

Ultraman

然則 LEGAL 左就可以 PROTECT 她們了﹖加拿大好似係合法化的﹐你點解釋豬場東主那件事呢﹖
Littleprince 發表於 2009-12-11 12:36

Please stop talking and relating to more nonsense. Everyone can kill anyone even killing is surely illegal. Not limited to prostitute. Taxi drivers can kill their riders, so taxi should be illegalized?

Ultraman

Even if it's legalized, the protection is still very limited, so what's the benefit?  the money to enforce will be high just like the safe injection sites.  Who will be paying for it?  We always empha ...
shutterbug 發表於 2009-12-11 12:29

For the money issue, no matter in which way would be pretty much the same.
Either, to spend money to arrange special or more cop teams to investigate and stop illegal prostitution; or, to spend money for protection such as safe house, injection, body check etc. In whichever way is still using taxpayers' money.

Ultraman

係咩﹐唔準講廢話的嗎﹖點解我看見好多好多廢話既﹖
Littleprince 發表於 2009-12-11 12:47

Oh of course you can be one of them. But as long as you tell me you're talking about nonsense/garbage, I can ignore you.