peter236

I posted this already wor.

http://www.loyaukee.com/forum/vi ... &extra=page%3D1

peter236

你哋兩位媚共份子鍾意自我感覺良好嘅話，我當然唔會阻你。但作為一個電腦人，我就會話，以今時今日嘅電腦科 ...
Lik 發表於 2010-6-1 12:33

Mr Lik, your comments is flawed as usual. You are just jealous of Chinese progress. On the surface, you are just attacking the CCP, which is understandable, but in fact you are a racist against the Chinese. To morons like you, every thing that Chinese people do is for face only.

It is important that China improves the living standards of the people and their scientific technology level at the same time. They are not mutually exclusive.

Your comments on "distributed computing" is totally laughable. If you know nothing about supercomputing, then just STFU rather than embarrassing yourself yet again. All the other countries are still building supercomputers, the US, Japan, Europe are all building more new supercomputers. Why else would they do it if there is no such need? This shows there is a need for these computers, unlike what you claimed.

While "distributed computing" is another way of doing it, but you are still distributing work among very power computers. According to the experts the costs are about the same, unlike what you claimed. You still need about the same number of microprocessors to produce about the same amount of computer power, whether they are located at the same location or distributed across disparate locations.

In the US, there are so many universities, government and research labs that have supercomputers. There are so many scientific applications for supercomputers.
All these supercomputers are already cooperating with each other by distributing work among themselves. These computer are getting cheaper to build all the time. Today's supercomputer will look slow compared with the supercomputers 5yrs or 10 yrs from now.

Lik, we talking about government and universities doing advanced scientific research here, not your computer at home running SETI or Prime95 while idling.

peter236

they bought others technology and claimed to be their invention. it's just a big clone!
habitrailspace 發表於 2010-6-1 12:38

You are just jealous of Chinese technology advancement.

peter236

Oh no, damn it. I thought I would be quicker than you this time.
rockypath 發表於 2010-6-1 14:55

Thanks for posting.

peter236

其實每個國家地方都有貧富懸殊嘅問題。咁係唔係代表所有嘅資源都去哂濟貧而唔攪其他科研發展或大型活動？我 ...
fibbi 發表於 2010-6-1 16:25

I agree with you here. Like at the Olympics and the Shanghai Expo, most of the money was spent on basic infrastructure that they needed anyway, e.g new highways, subways, airport expansion, water supply system, solar power etc.

peter236

There is nothing wrong with technological achievements thems ...
Lik 發表於 2010-6-1 16:13

Lik, like you have shown many times before, you have no clue as to how to develop a country's technology. You claimed to be expert in cars, photography etc and now computers? What a joke you are?

If you have only $3500/yr, that is your own problem.
In fact, research results from supercomputing e.g petroleum exploration, can generate income for the country as a whole, thereby raising per capita GDP.
But like you said China's GDP is now $3500 per capita. So how high should their per capita GDP be, before they should invest in supercomputers, $20,000 per capita? $30,000 per capita?
At the current rate of economic growth of about 10% per year, it is going to take another 20-30 years to reach that level. By that time China will be lagging far behind other countries in supercomputers. This is the right time for China to start their supercomputer technology as it has broad range of scientific applications.

peter236

估錯咗啦，sorry。你唔識就係唔識，獻醜就不如藏拙啦～


中國當然唔係做乜野都錯。但當你咁多地方都仲係 ...
Lik 發表於 2010-6-2 01:32

You stupid moron, supercomputers can in fact make money and improve the living standards of the ordinary people.
Like I said before, research results from supercomputing e.g petroleum exploration, aerospace, finance, software, biiotechnology, and other research at universities etc are generating income for the country as a whole, thereby raising per capita GDP. The return of investments are in the billions of dollars. That is why so many countries are using supercomputers.

So please STFU and admit your ignorance, if you know nothing about computer technology and their applications..

peter236

Lik does not know what a supercomputer is, where it is used and what the application of the power  ...
rockypath 發表於 2010-6-2 02:15

He just likes to bash the Chinese whatever they does. Just laugh at this stupid clown.

peter236

當北京十萬上訪人民有冤無路訴，胡溫訪災爛秀與他們何干？
當上海強遷戶引訴無門無處容身，世博千年盛典 ...
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2010-6-2 11:30

The supercomputers can in fact make money and thereby improve the living standards of the ordinary people.
Like I said before, research results and applications from supercomputing e.g petroleum exploration, aerospace, finance, software, biotechnology, and other research at universities etc are generating income for the country as a whole, thereby raising per capita income. The return of investments are in terms of billions of dollars. That is why so many countries are using supercomputers.

Those residents on the Shanghai Expo site were given new apartments by the government. Some of the old apartments did not have modern wash room or proper heating anyway. So it is a big upgrade for the residents there.

peter236

A lot of the lavish exhibits in Shanghai will be torn down after the Expo event. How much did it cos ...
Lik 發表於 2010-6-2 13:41

Lik, you stupid moron, each country is responsible for paying their own pavilion at the Shanghai Expo. You didn't know about that?
China only pays for China pavalion, which has a solar panel rooftop for generating power for thousands of families.

Canada is just a small country, with big deficits and loads of debt.
They take HST from you.

In terms of investment in infrastructure at the Beijing Olympics and the Shanghai Expo, most of the investments are actually in basic infrastructure that they need anyway, like new subway, highway, expansion of airports, water supply system, solar power etc.
Beijing airport is now the third busiest airport in the world.

Many of the Beijing Olympics venues became parts of the universities there and used by students or by the general public, or became training centers for their various national teams.