peter236

If I were Elder Deng, I would sack Li Peng and talk to the students with an open mind. The students have proven their qualities to be a peaceful bunch, as did the majority of the public. They had an a ...
Lik 發表於 2009-6-6 21:01

You moron, how do you even know what those students were thinking 20 years ago? Please do not make things up.

You don't even have a clue of how to develop a country. Perhaps you should  go to slumdog millionaire India and see how corrupted they are.

The economic development in China for the past 30 years have made China more ready for political reforms in the future. Right now the per capita GDP and average education level of mainland Chinese are still lower than that of Taiwanese when they first had their democratic elections. But the time will come.
Again, economic reforms should come before political reforms, just like in Japan/South Korea/Taiwan, which all have way higher per capita GDP than slumdog millionaire India.

peter236

And one more thing. Contrary to what you have repeated shown in various threads and posts, I would never underestimate India and its people. Their country is rich with history, and their citizens are  ...
Lik 發表於 2009-6-6 21:27

China's per capita GDP(nominal) is at least three times larger than that of India.
why would a democratic country lag so far behind?

peter236

But at the end, I think we stay here not  because solely because canada is a democracy country, but more because it is a country relatveily safe crimes activties, high quality education, stable econom ...
chobit 發表於 2009-6-8 06:33

For example, Lik will not go to democratic India where the slumdog millionaires live without stable supply of water or electricity.

peter236

好地地仲乜去印度? 你幾時出發去剛果平息當地既內戰?
mcjohnjohn 發表於 2009-6-9 01:51

Because India is democratic and he likes that.

peter236

democratic? 咁佢留o係加拿大就得啦! 仲乜要去到咁遠woh, 為左食咖哩咩.
mcjohnjohn 發表於 2009-6-9 05:04

The point here is that countries, like democratic India, where democracy was implemented before economic reforms, will remain relatively poor. Therefore, Lik will not go there or even talk about it.
Japan/South Korea/Taiwan, all experienced rapid economic growth before they got any type of democracy. All of those places have way higher per capita GDP than India. Even mainland China's per capita GDP is three times that of India.

peter236

Citizen's basic needs are more important at the moment, eh?

Then why do we have the aerospace program, the Olympic extravagance, the local government extravagance, the 3 Gorges dam construction, the ...
Lik 發表於 2009-6-9 13:30

You moron, the aerospace program has economic and scientific applications.
For example, China is capable of launching satellites for other countries, thereby making a lot of money.
China is setting up its own GPS system, therefore in the future, there is no need to rely on the US satellites.
Of course, weather satellites are used in forecasting the weather, environmental satellites are capable of finding new natural resources, and communications satellites are used in TV broadcasting.
All these can improve the living standards of the people now, not to mention the basic scientific research that can be carried out in the space station.
Even democratic India is claiming that they will send astronauts to the moon before China will.

The hosting of the Olympics has allowed China to gain valuable expertise in the logistics of hosting a large event. Japan did it in the 1960's and south Korea did it in the 1980's.

peter236

LOL~ Blowing gazillions' worth of dollars only to make several million back from the aerospace program? I'd love to see you going into business, Peter boy~

It is quite true that China used to be the  ...
Lik 發表於 2009-6-9 23:15

You moron, aerospace program is profitable and is necessary for a country's scientific research. I gave you some examples of applications e.g GPS, communications, weather, natural resources, military etc.

You fuking retard, why do you still pretend not to understand that the aerospace program is very important? Who is going to make and launch satellites for China for free?
China is capable of launching satellites for other countries, thereby making a lot of money. China is setting up its own GPS system, there is no need to rely on the US satellites.
Environmental satellites are capable of finding new natural resources, and communications satellites are used in TV broadcasting.

Communications satellite is very important in business and commerce. We are talking about billions of dollars. You can't even watch some TV programs without satellite broadcasting.

How is China going to forecast the weather without weather satellite? Use American satellite?

peter236

小弟覺得, 中國射d 太空人上太空既主要目的, 係要比班美國佬知道如果要打杖既話, 中國未必會輸比佢.
mcjohnjohn 發表於 2009-6-9 23:47

He is not going to understand the importance of launching communication satellites, even though he uses them indirectly everyday.

peter236

http://www.epochtimes.com/b5/9/3/13/n2461273.htm
Nam 發表於 2009-6-10 00:14

Most people, including Lik, won't even read anything from those FLG people.

peter236

講開又講, 如果剩係射通訊衛星, 比人地射好過啦! 駛乜用咁多錢去研究woh.
擺明而家中國係想全世界都知, 我有能力做呢樣野, 我唔駛靠你地都做得到! 呢個絕對係中國既軍事本錢.

而家唔係講值唔值得用咁多錢去證明自 ...
mcjohnjohn 發表於 2009-6-10 00:02

You moron, a large country like China needs to possess the technology of launching satellites. I already gave you many examples of commercial uses of satellites. The technology was already there since a lot of it comes from launching military missiles.