peter236

Most likely faked news with no evidence.

peter236

The so-called lack of supply of high-quality fly ash is faked news. China burns large amounts of coal for electricity, and fly-ash is the by-product, and therefore the supply of high-quality fly ash is abundant.
We should highly doubt this piece of unsubstantiated claim from SCMP.

peter236

回復  peter236

杜峻曉：鐵路工程師為何不願坐高鐵

(作者為人民日報社陜西分社社長)

年前，與中鐵某局 ...
lo_pak 發表於 2011-3-1 15:03

I saw this article before. It seems this person worry about the train hitting birds.
But I saw in a Discovery Channel documentary showing the Chinese did tests on highspeed impact. The windshield on the trains are made with reinforced materials. So hitting birds at highspeed will not produce any danger to the driver or the passenger.

It seems this article talks about nothing other than the unfounded fear of hitting birds at highspeed.
All highspeed trains, in any country, will hit birds at highspeed, but it will not produce any danger to the driver or the passenger.

peter236

雀撞車窗，少事。
路軌無沉降，先至係重點呀！
咪轉移視線！
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2011-3-1 16:27

You stupid moron, in China the foundation pillars are pounded onto the bedrock, so that no subsidence will happen.

How many years did they wait before they build the overhead Canada Line in Richmond?

peter236

第一，雀撞車窗係一個引子，如果只係講雀頭兩段已經講完。唔該睇成篇文佢。
第二，打左地基都照可以沉，成 ...
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2011-3-1 17:03

The whole of Japan is sinking due to their earthquake zone. They still built their highspeed railway decades ago with much less modern techniques.

In Richmond, it does not matter how fast Canada Line trains are, if it sinks it will, even if no trains travel on top of it. How many years did they wait in Richmond?

peter236

點解canada line 要等？
要等既係高鐵路軌啵？
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2011-3-1 18:30

Because Richmond is sinking, they have to wait.

peter236

Canada line 已經係高架橋，何況快極都唔過80km/h，行一陣又要停站，條軌直唔直都乜所謂。
當你飛到300幾, ...
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2011-3-1 18:45

Chinese highspeed railway also use 高架橋, in order to avoid crossing with highways and other roads and also reduce footprints on farmlands.
Chinese highspeed railway is elevated, except for places near the train stations.

peter236

仲有no3 road 行車行左十幾廿年，仲要等沉？你啲logic真係'goodest'囉~
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2011-3-1 19:53

Cars are light, but the pillars, elevated tracks and trains are much heavier.

peter236

The whole Guangzhou Station is elevated. All the tracks and platforms are elevated. The elevated tracks right across the landscape, reducing the footprints on the farmlands.
Most of the network is elevated where it is necessary.

peter236