peter236

hahaha, the highspeed railway is good for commerce, tourism and environment. Just look at the highspeed railway between big cities like Tokyo and Osaka, which receive high praise. More highspeed railway still needed to be built. Very well done China again.

peter236

Honestly, I don't think the Chinese government would really care whether this line will be profitabl ...
rockypath 發表於 2011-4-11 01:18

China just cannot accommodate 1 billion cars on the road. That is the why the long term strategy is to have tens of millions of people using public transit, like railways and subways.
When the oil prices increase more in the future, the US economy will be destroyed since they are too dependent on cars. But the Chinese have electric powered highspeed railway, of which the energy source is much more flexible.

peter236

報紙個名就叫經濟日報﹐但講既野就一D經濟sense 都無﹐台灣報紙就係o甘既水準? ( 力仔更加沒水準係人所共知 ...
京滬高鐵會虧本的唯一原因是斗不過民航客機﹐但除著燃油價大幅上脹﹐再加上國民消費力上升﹐運輸需求增加﹐高鐵前景都算樂觀的。
soli 發表於 2011-4-11 05:04

Taking the highspeed railway is a lot more convenient, because of the security checks at the airports.

China just cannot accommodate 1 billion cars on the road. That is the why the long term strategy is to have tens of millions of people using public transit, like railways.

When the oil prices increase more in the future, the US economy will be destroyed since they are too dependent on cars. But the Chinese have electric powered highspeed railway, of which the energy source is much more flexible.

peter236

回復  soli


    廣告收入係可觀
不過係取決於接觸面有幾廣
香港地鐵就揾到啖食
高鐵無人坐
邊個會去賣廣 ...
sheep 發表於 2011-4-11 21:22

高鐵無人坐? You went to China to see all the highspeed railway yourself? How do you know?

peter236

係人都知
十卡九空啦
摷番啲舊post睇吓啦
sheep 發表於 2011-4-11 21:29

係人都知? Is this what you could come up with?
We need to see passengers statistics on every train and every highspeed railway line, over the next 20 - 30 years.