peter236

Since when did Canada require its computer technicians to have university
degree lair ?? Please fe ...
fy789 發表於 2011-6-21 16:10

Just stop wasting time on that moron who has no background on research engineering.

The only thing that he did was assembling PCs, and some cables for other people, LOL.
How pathetic?

peter236

Ha?Not complaining?
Then why they need tO buy license from MIPS tech?
As your theory, no matter wher ...
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2011-6-21 16:13

Some other countries can design their own make indigenous CPUs that are compatible with x86, so they can run the same software.

peter236

I think they are making it MIPS instruction set compatible. Not so much buying a MIPS core. One'd wa ...
BiscottiGelato 發表於 2011-6-22 12:06

Exactly, I used AMD and Intel, as an example of different designs that can run compatible softwares, but those bashers just won't listen.

peter236

...... Both intel and AMD are x86 core.......
AMD needs to buy license from intel to product x86-64  ...
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2011-6-22 17:35

But AMD and Intel are different designs, both compatible with x86 instructions.
The Japanese need to buy the company that invented SPARC, because they are not capable of making their own CPU design.
AMD is capable to design their own CPU, just like the Chinese Loongson project is able to design their own CPU.

peter236

do you have NEW POINT???
your argument is invaild，using SPARC means NOT OWN CPU design, but using M ...
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2011-6-22 20:06

You got the wrong concept here. Just take AMD as an example. AMD's design is different from Intel's, even though both support x86 instructions.
Are you saying AMD people just sit there and do nothing?
AMD's CPU are different from Intel's. AMD over the years has increased the number of cores in each CPU and shrink the process, 65nm, 45 nm, 25nm etc.

You should forget about discussing here, since clearly you do not have the education background to continue this discussion.

peter236

Hahaha.............
fy789 發表於 2011-6-22 20:55

These books are beyond their education level. These amateurs should be ignored.

peter236

Fujitsu is making processors against SPARC
China dudes is making processors against MIPS

Only diffe ...
BiscottiGelato 發表於 2011-6-23 13:52

This is a fair comparison. The Chinese Loongson CPU started as a university research project, where professors and graduate students worked on the design of the Chinese CPU.

But some people here make an excuse to discredit the Chinese researchers, for the purpose of anti-Chinese bashing, that has become so common on this forum.

peter236

Then Peter can you explain why you discredit fujitsu Researcher using the same theory ?
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2011-6-23 20:39

The reason is that Fujitsu had to buy HAL Computer Systems, an American company that designs the SPARC compatible CPU. This shows Fujitsu has no CPU design capability.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HAL_Computer_Systems

The Chinese Loongson project did not buy another company. They started from scratch and design their own MIPS compatible CPU.

peter236

stupid.
CT paid to use MIPS 32 and 64,
This shows CT has no CPU design capability.
no different the ...
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2011-6-24 04:32

No doubt loongson is Chinese developed, but why the hell you need to use such a stupid excuse to bas ...
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2011-6-21 06:02

You moron, you already admitted previously that the Chinese designed their own CPU. So you should stop contradicting yourself.

Fujitsu had to buy HAL Computer Systems, an American company that designs the SPARC compatible CPU. This shows Fujitsu has no CPU design capability.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HAL_Computer_Systems

The Chinese Loongson project did not buy another company. They started from scratch and desiged their own MIPS compatible CPU.

peter236

I wouldnt say Loongson is not 'chineses' but in the other hands, bashing fujitsu SPARC fx by the ISA ...
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2011-6-24 16:12

But BiscottiGelato has already explained the differences.
Why are you so stubborn? For the purpose of basing the Chinese?