返回列表 發帖

Is it illegal to repost newspaper/magazine content?

I just saw the following news on mingpao. This time I am not going to qoute the content of this article.
So reposting part of a news article is illegal? Even when we qoute the source of it?
http://www.mingpaonews.com/20090307/gga1.htm

if the article is not free (such as paid member only site), one should not disclose the content. (I think...)

TOP

Section 29 of Canada's Copyright Act. Fair dealing. It is ok

TOP

I think if you only quote one or two sentences from the article then it's okay.

As long as you are commenting on the articles and link them back so the readers can read the rest there... then it shouldn't violate the copyright.

what they are concern about is the fact that people "copy & paste" entire articles and images to a new location. then the readers would actually be gaining information from this 'new' site instead of the original source.

TOP

原帖由 rainbow-davie 於 2009-3-6 02:21 PM 發表
put a reference on top.. saying where the source from.  provided with a link. you will be fine.

I usually do that.

TOP

put a reference on top.. saying where the source from.  provided with a link. you will be fine.

TOP

我估係因為個網民SCAN左一D要比錢subscribe先睇到的content所以比人拉。不過有時見到一D網上文章下面都有conpyright sentence就要小心

TOP

原帖由 吳孟達 於 2009-3-6 14:43 發表
and since this news is from Hong Kong....and we all know that law in HK seems to protect big corporate and rich people like Hyde more......

Unlike Canadian laws, we protect criminals more.......haha. ...

agree....
無希望無失望

TOP

and since this news is from Hong Kong....and we all know that law in HK seems to protect big corporate and rich people like Hyde more......

Unlike Canadian laws, we protect criminals more.......haha...

So, you will be protected and safe since we have 'human rights'..
Vancouver is ______ !

TOP

Yes. I think there are statutory laws/copy rights and private restrictions. Whatever in which kind, once they clearly stated over there, any kind/format of reposting/republishing in any portion is a wrongful act and could be sued by the claimant. (which I think this issue had been brought out before, just seemed nobody cares.)
Remember, innocence doesn't mean non-guilty.

TOP

返回列表